Apologize

That's what low-IQ craiglets believe. That the opinion of some boomer judge on who is Satoshi (an anonymous internet persona) matters in any way. The reality is, if he owns Satoshi's keys, it doesn't matter if he proves anything in boomer court or not, it doesn't matter if he gets any recognition from people. That's the point of a distributed permissionless ledger. If he doesn't, then talk is cheap. Any attempts to get recognition are likely to be futile considered he has admittedly forged documents. A cheap PR stunt that only craiglets fall for.

That's what low-IQ craiglets believe. That the opinion of some boomer judge on who is Satoshi (an anonymous internet persona) matters in any way. The reality is, if he owns Satoshi's keys, it doesn't matter if he proves anything in boomer court or not, it doesn't matter if he gets any recognition from people. That's the point of a distributed permissionless ledger. If he doesn't, then talk is cheap. Any attempts to get recognition are likely to be futile considering he has admittedly forged documents. A cheap PR stunt that only craiglets fall for.

what a millenial fag...
he isnt going to court to prove that he is satoshi. he is going so chink cant say anymore that he isnt. what do you think will happen once the court decides what every person with atleast 75iq knows? chink and others will have to pay him millions, he will literally destroy everything they've build during the last years.

Nick Szabo is Satoshi

The Craig spam on the board is worse than the chain link spam from last year.

Attached: 99ABD6D7-2F7A-489A-ACE9-91D6EA57E8C6.png (438x397, 400K)

Nick is Hal you absolute moron
Craig = le god

I don't even give a shit if he is Satoshi or not, I love seeing him stir up shit with the Core fags who have centralized Bitcoin. He's done more interesting things with BCH and now BSV in 1 year than they have in the last 5 years.

This is what blocklets are defending.

The absolute state.

Attached: Lightning.png (1000x594, 115K)

>goes to court to prove identity
>he's not trying to prove anything

>judges need to know literally everything about something to make a ruling
>specialists never take the stand