Final prototype for 0xchan is underway

final prototype for 0xchan is underway.
a 2019 release of the decentralized ETH powered version of Jow Forums is expected to be on time.

white paper here: 0xchan.net/media/0xchan_white_paper.pdf
dev site here: 0xchan.net

the devs recently made a medium post about updates to the chan here: medium.com/@sumpunk

overall, it has serious potential in my opinion.
the app itself only interacts with a smart contract and there isnt a mechanism with which anyone can censor that activity from happening short of taking down the entire ETH blockchain and as of today ETF's on ETH are in the pipeline for approval, so just count that out altogether.

the moderation is also decentralized and sourced out to posters on the board to vote on if a post or user needs to be reprimanded for whatever they posted.

anyways, general discussion on this unique reinvention of 4chins

Attached: file.png (1642x924, 493K)

>the devs

Attached: you.png (546x329, 494K)

imagine thinking a pajeet would be intelligent enough to create a good working version of a literal decentralized chan.

user I...

Never gonna work

Imagine shilling an erc-20 token based on a "decentralized" version of 4chin.. LMAO

Attached: neckbeard.png (429x573, 509K)

why not, all the bases seem to be pretty covered at this point?

>pls elaborate

im skeptical if it would work, but id like to see it be tried once.

Can't wait to spam Italian baked cheese pies and get it taken down in less than 24 hours

nobody is going to pay to shipost you faggot
you've completely wasted your time

Attached: 1554318268143.gif (500x557, 22K)

>not knowing that according to the 0xchan white paper that staking into the board (2 ETH) will earn you passive income from not even posting on it

its essentially a get paid to post model is what im getting at here.
read the white paper

they just told me in discord that it will never moon. literally pointless to hold this token as they will be minted forever

This is an absurdly bad idea, faggots are just going to put the worst cp imaginable onto these blockchains

and when they do that, it will be traced back to the 0x address they posted with and thru some nerd magic they will likely end up in prison if they are not 100% anonymous.

and it goes without saying that illegal content will be voted off of the board and the user who posted the content will suffer a 2 ETH loss of their stake in the board.

so the question is, is 2 ETH worth losing just so you can attack an autistic decentralized version of Jow Forums with just for some lulz?

to be fair you have a very low IQ, this project isnt that complicated to understand and if you really did read the white paper you have absolutely no reading comprehension whatsoever

so who decides if you lose your stake

i did read the white paper. my IQ is just fine thank you very much, the white paper takes a mistaken approach to the whole idea. this needs to be rethought out.

10 people vote on whatever post gets reported.
if 6 of them vote in favor of issuing a "ban" or a penalty of your 2 ETH stake (text and image posting) or .5 ETH stake (text only posting) then the post if removed from the smart contract index so the board no longer pulls that post info and posters stake is distributed to all posters with a stake in the board. this is all in the whitepaper.

Tell me you plan to integrate chainlink so we can bet on gets via smart contracts

why, the dev of course!
this is just a cleverly disguised ponzi eth "game" lmao

i'll relay this to the dev literally right now

and zcl holders?

am i right in saying the more CP posted and the more bans, the higher the income for the site?

this has to be the most retarded thing ever

>ITT newfags with dreams
It HAS been tried multiple times, and every time some poojeet army floods the board with CP, begging for gibs and scams.

Yea bro cmon u guys want users and we want to use it but not without chainlink integration. It's what we all obsess about daily

holding ZCI or ZCH will get your passive income via dividends.
you can either choose to use ZCH for posting or just hold it and earn passive off of staking.

precisely. the cost to attack 0xchan is 2 ETH (whatever the current price is at xyz time in the future of the attack) so if someone wants to just attack the board with literal illegal content their stake is penalized and distributed out to all 0xchan users who have an active stake. staking is to prevent malicious actors and pajeets from posting altogether.

>selling (you)s
LMAO

yeah, but they only lose heir stake once they get banned, this takes time, they could flood the board with loads of posts before being banned for 2 ETH

If I write about my crippling autism and post loli toons that I made, do I lose my Eth?

because you have to get 10 people to vote.

see? this whole thing is retarded and complicated now

I've always wanted to pay 1 penny per shitpost that takes 30 minutes to complete...

Attached: penny.png (1514x262, 48K)

100% likely at this point.
I am probably gonna have to become a dev in hopes of accumulation of the ETH, sirs

a user cannot be "banned" in the sense a Jow Forums user is banned for xyz amount of days without posting abilities.
0xchan does not record IP's - and there is not a mechanism to prevent anyone from interacting with the smart contract that powers 0xchan.
since this entire chan concept is literally ran off of a smart contract.
so, once the user is "banned" their 2 ETH stake is taken.
all they have to do to post back to the board is put another stake back into the board.

yes. if 10 ZCH holders decide your post was spam, 6 out of 10, then you lose your eth. its great fun to post for the whole family

didnt you get the news? ETH 2.0 code base is set for completion at the end of June. and its likely the code will go mainnet in 2020.

>it will be instant posting.

yeah so basically, if 6 people disaprove of your post, you lose $340

and the voting will take time.
each user gets a notification they need to vote on something.
they have xyz amount of days to vote.
if they fail to vote, the smart contract notifies another user they need to vote, process continues until 10 votes are cast.

in the meantime the person is free to post thousands of gigabytes of CP

If you have to stake to post, this will NEVER be successful.

exactly.

chump change really but i get your point.
its doubtful imo that 10 users will all choose to abuse the mod vote system.
its just something we will have to wait and see.

only a fool would do that since by default your posts on 0xchan are linked to your 0x address. and nearly every fiat gateway to buying ETH is kyc. there is almost a zero percent chance someone doesnt get arrested for that. imo

the stake is to prevent spam, malicious actors, and pajeets from posting
the board operates in such a way that users are paid to post via a passive income structure.

Yes.

Attached: 1556289823848.jpg (483x581, 126K)

and to be quite frank, i dont want to post on any chan with some fucking poorfag who thinks 2 ETH is "a lot of money"

if u nomsayin

2 words: sybil attack

You're a moron, chief.

impossible. but try harder to fud the project

and you probably have a networth sub $10k
>sad

so why have a stake at all? why not just delete it from the frontend and let law enforcement handle the rest?

sybil attack means that i can pretend to be 10 people with 10 seperate eth addresses and i can make a vote against anyone

funny how that's your defense. I'd love to detail MY crypto project that has silicon valley vc funding behind it and >$10m valuation 2 years in, but you'd probably go try and look up the team info and dox all of us.

Cuz you're mad and your idea is bad.

Actually thinks the rich get richer by doing nothing is good

because that would require a degree of centralization.
>0xchan is self moderated by all of its users

there is no central entity for the police to contact if something on 0xchan is illegal.
the police can literally just look thru the blockchain at all the info about the post.

>what is randomization
its exceedingly unlikely one person with 10 addresses will have more than 1 address chosen to vote ont he same post in question

Lol pay eth to shitpost. This is going to be huge!

it will fail. the game theory behind the voting system is beyond retarded. Please explain to me how the system aims to prevent that even normal content gets 5+ down votes?? Users could just collude and ban / downvote everything because they personally benefit. The more bans the more ETH for everyone.

furthermore, why would anyone even want to do this?
what would they gain? nothing of importance.

your point is moot.

yeah like i said, the police can look at the blockchain. so why bother with the stake? why penalise? anyone can put cp on a blockchain for pennies. they dont need 0xchan to do it. so just have token holders vote for mods to delete it from the front end?

your argument is that you want centralization.
thats a newfag point.
hasnt the centralized mods on this board and others like it ever fucked you over?

i'd rather have a random jury of my peers vote on whether my posts get banned/etc

well, if people getting banned means investors make higher divs then token holders might have an incentive to ban people using a sybil attack. my point is far from moot you pseud

t. pls give me centralized kike mods

gas yourself nigger

You sound like a utter faggot. I will now fud this garbage every time I see it based on how much of a bitch you’re acting like. This won’t need to really be fudded bc it’s obvious how pointless this shit is. Kys and get saged.

i bet you dont even have $20k to your name in liquid thats how low IQ i think you are dude.
im done with your brainlet questions.

t. assmad pajeet

stay mad. poorfag.

so wait, people voting to ban and people voting for mods to do the banning is different how? why not just have no bans, and have a true free for all, do away withh censorship altogether.

The voting system will turn it into reddit

No one is going to pay 2 ETH so they can post on a Reddit x Jow Forums abortion.

delete your "code base"

mate im an early bitcoin adopter and original ethereum ICO investor. you've messed the whole concept of a decentralised Jow Forums up badly

Okay sumpunks lil dicksucker. Nobody is going to actually use this besides p3dtards. The amount of stupidity in this whole thread is ridiculous lol. You actually think this is going to be successful. Lemme guess, your dumbass bought in and helped fill the 200 eth in buys. Wasn’t the cap set at 2000 eth? Seems like even p3dtards aren’t braindead enough to throw money into this trash. Fucking Kek my sides

Attached: 7D66F0B1-450C-4E4A-989E-0ED6BDADB865.jpg (250x250, 5K)

that seems awfully easy to form a group and take down things you don't like

t. this faggot actually enjoys posting with poorfags, pajeets, and he loves it when kike mods ban him for stupid shit

you are the cancer killing Jow Forums.

you're the poorfag who thinks 20k is worth boasting

>this faggot is actually pajeet shilling on Jow Forums
Fucking Kek how fucking stupid could you possibly be.
>you are the cancer killing Jow Forums
Lmfao meanwhile you’re shitting it up with this garbage idea that will lose people money. Fucking classic holy fucking kek

Attached: 88BF2F0E-01D6-483F-BA6D-B2C5E32391E3.jpg (300x300, 11K)

you are entitled to your own brand of stupidity.

but just keep in mind, ISP's have already gotten away with preventing their users from accessing Jow Forums and cripple chan.
its just a matter of time before accessing Jow Forums in general becomes impossible due to political climates.
therefore, the need for a censorship resistent and decentralized chan emerges.

i also bet you make insanely terrible trades since you fail to see the usecase requirements of the future.
enjoy posting on your kikebook and twitter when legacy Jow Forums becomes extinct.

sybill attack is possible for selecting what to ban, but the jurying process is stilll randomized and thus not possible.

it's no different from what we have now, except instead of a mod accessing your reports you have a randomized selection of users

everyone is a jannie

no my argument was the incentives for the voting system are fucked up. so stay on topic, i am neither for nor against jannies although you have to admit that incentivizing the whole community to ban content is stupid af. at least if you can't get banned too for banning / downvoting normal content

>hurrrrrrrrr
back to discord you go little faggot. Stop projecting your problems onto people lol
>24 replies
You must really be upset right now. I love pissing faggots off like yourself. Keep these responses coming please.

Attached: 9CC033A7-2E67-49D8-9B27-35BD98A7CCC4.jpg (334x506, 42K)

if the community decides that content is not ban worthy then the reporter gets penalized

why is this BETTER than what we have now. the main issue i see is that we have jannies at all. whats the point of a decentralised Jow Forums if we just replace jannies with random kangaroo courts of anons how will this materially benefit us? or is this all just a social experiment?

how is everyone incentivized to auto vote in favor of a ban on the system when they themselves could potentially get fucked?
i think you'll find that "do unto others as you would have them do unto you" will be a key built in user behavior on 0xchan when it comes to moderation.
i'd like to think most ppl are not as greedy as you are apparently assuming they are.

>your point is moot and will be time tested to be a non-issue

well if 200 users use the platform and 100 discord faggots decide to down vote everything no matter what to earn more divs than you are fucked.

whats stopping a group to vote ban harmless posts for the eth?

because false reporting on 0xchan can result in you losing your stake of 2 ETH or .5 ETH

>decentralized chan
>10 people can vote and take your eth
Fucking lel what a meme. If Jow Forums goes down something else will take its place and it won’t be a pay to post memeboard. Youre missing the forest for the trees here you braindead Imbecile.

>he still doesnt understand that 0xchan users are PAID to post

you didnt pass your high school english classes did you?

the point it's uncensorable and perhaps untraceable. OP's point that people who put illegal content can be traced is moot as you could easily use a mixer

tldr:
>pedos can put illegal content
that's how it is. pedos can put illegal content on chain NOW.
>why is this better
not necessarily, it's worse in terms of cost, but better in terms of robust-ness against censorship and heightened anonymity

except that what is false will be decided by them

>paid with an erc20 shitcoin
Wow so kewl LOL

worse in terms of upfront cost*. Apparently you can withdraw your stake and be paid to post

so people with money control the imageboard
well thats a good idea but why dont i just post on facebook

again, i am not looking at individuals but group behaviour and collusion.

>if 200 users use the platform and 100 discord faggots decide to down vote everything no matter what to earn more divs then you are fucked.

my thoughts exactly anyome with a few hundred eth can be its despot