Finally after one week of waiting, Satoshi has honored us with yet another of his highly educational articles. In this he explains why BTC is NOT Bitcoin. Enjoy the read guys, I know I will!
medium.com
NEW SATOSHI ARTICLE!
Cooper Cruz
Samuel Jones
>"People are being led to believe they are getting Bitcoin when in fact they are getting a crippled developer-controlled mutation."
It is true and you all know it deep down. Craig was always based and still is.
Xavier Robinson
So when moon?
Cooper Price
15 BSV here. when moon?
Lucas Price
Just be patient. It could be quite soon, or it could take up to a year or two. But it will happen. Craig is about to reveal in court how much BTC he holds, Visa statements and other proof that he is Satoshi and started Bitcoin, etc. The law will catch up with all these other scams leaving BSV as the only viable system.
Elijah Morris
actually holding shitloads of btc doesn't prove anything. only way to prove it is to sign it. in fact anyone can produce a list of bitcoin whale addresses and claim they own them.
Jose Ward
Dunno but i have 120 of em. Within a week he will be showing the addresses that he got coins to and the details of the trust. I feel like this binance, tether stuff is all part of a larger swamp that needs to be drained by the white hats. Based satoshi, Make Crypto Great Again.
Parker Morris
Imagine the IQ level required to believe nChain.
Juan Cooper
Signing doesn't prove he is Satoshi. It proves he has a key. He could have stolen the key from Satoshi.
It would be interesting if he had a key but that would not prove he is Satoshi. Real proof would be a collection of diverse evidence including credit card statements showing he bought the bitcoin.org domain, testimony from individuals who talked with him and who knew he was Satoshi in 2009 or prior, early drafts of the Bitcoin whitepaper or similar filed with a government before 2009 (the metanet whitepaper filed with the aus govt for instance).
Keys alone are NOT proof.
Julian Cooper
A claim under oath idiot
Colton Barnes
The whole myth of Craig Wright being Satoshi Nakamoto stems from the infamous 2015 media leak consisting of provably fabricated documents and a bunch of "testimonials" from "crypto influencers", which was set up by Papa Calvin (nChain owner) . Everything from Craig's personality to his biography points to this being an elaborate PR campaign.
>A man claims to have seen space aliens and comes out with the evidence.
>The evidence turns out to be fabricated.
>"This man is more knowledgeable about aliens than anyone I know, he MUST have seen aliens, but he just wants to mislead disbelievers!"
Evan Brown
Has he proved he has the keys yet? eksdee
Elijah Powell
>Keys alone are NOT proof
It's still a better proof than writing bullshit blogposts trying to justify not having the keys.
Caleb Evans
You assume he needs to prove anything to you.
Information has value. Why would he prove anything to a bunch of trolls on twitter and reddit?
He he proves anything, it will be in court where he can use it to his advantage.
It doesn't matter whether you believe or not in the slightest.
Oliver Ward
Right. Because this is a farce and the real Satoshi lies low in the shadows. There are some clues indicating that. Obviously he greatly benefits from a paid fool like Craig jerking around in public, but the truth is still out there and we must dig it.
Jaxson Ward
If you want to believe that, go ahead
Nicholas Foster
>humans are unable to lie
Jason Wilson
You must be a brainlet not to believe that. CSW is such a plain distraction that it's not funny anymore, he bought his first bitcoin in 2013. The real Satoshi is somewhere around, very close.
Eli Myers
>proven serial liar won't lie under oath when he has been cornered in court and his back is against the wall for his serial lying
nice
Adrian Barnes
It's not a lie if he honestly believes it to be true.
Isaac Reed
>mental facility after trial instead of prison
I'm ok with that
Aaron King
All it takes is one little signature craig. That's it. Why not just do the simplest fucking thing one could do and prove it without reasonable doubt instead of starting a circus? We all know the answer to this.