Lost 200k today. I, for one, welcome the wagie revolution (aka. communism) coming in the following years...

Not gonna happen. What most people don't understand is that wagies have low self-esteem. They believe they should be paid shit and get treated like shit, which is why the gop gets votes from people they shouldn't.

Yeah dude people get nostalgic for when things were hot putrid shit amirite? Also the huge percentages of people who miss communism sometimes over 60% are all hipsters lol

>even the CIA archives show that USSR citizens had around the same calorie intake, albeit higher nutrition in the same years
>the USSR has grown from a shit-tier peasant economy WHILE being ravaged by WW1 and WW2 to rival the US (which had not a single bomb thrown on its soil) in a mere 50 years
Not this time, fren. Reminder: we have multi-billionaires building comfy bunkers in preparation for the coming revolution/ecological disaster, we have to realize that the game is over. A planned economy is simply more efficient. We, the west, are fucked.

It's just a "phase", lol

wtf i love communism now!

>a planned economy is more efficient
It also has a single point of failure.

As opposed to economic anarchy which has a billion points of failure

>ITT: commies advocating status-sorted genocide so they can get free bread

Maybe you're incompetent. Should we change reality for you?

First of all the Soviet Union wasn't economic communism or even socialism and no Marxist scholar or critic claims otherwise; any success OR failure you want to attribute to it re socialism is bullshit, but it does make a good case for not giving the power of life or death into the hands of the state

NEETs and homeless were put in work camps (good move imho)

All information regarding the economic and social health of the Soviet Union was filtered through the Glavlit censors (read "the commissar vanishes")

usatoday.com/story/news/world/2015/03/13/vietnam-capitalism-global-post/70261770/

cato.org/publications/commentary/remarkable-fall-chinas-suicide-rate

Keep larping as an illiterate turn of the century Russian peasant on a business forum during the longest stretch of peace and plenty that humanity has ever experienced you fucking retard

Attached: 2C040439-5B29-43A1-8B13-E28F0B268D8C.jpg (540x675, 67K)

No it doesn't, you fucktard. Free market economies are naturally more resilient because of redundancy, and competitive insensitives guarantee such redundancy is always in place. Capitalism works to keep economies stable. The problem is slow accumulation of wealth inside oligarchs that lose reason to compete. Private ownership of critical infrastructure is what causes oligarchies, not capitalism as a whole.

Also, the most basic of problems when advocating for communism is social displacement, which in nearly every single state claiming to have achieved socialism or communism has led to state-sanctioned genocide.

based

>lost 200k from degenerate gambling
>fuck laws n borders n shit!

"Communism is when you let Mexicans rape your wife and the more Mexicans rape her the more communist you are"-Karl Marx

I'm sure you've read a lot of Marxist scholars about whether the Soviet union was or wasn't socialist

Stalin did or course have magic powers to manipulate the weather however he wanted

Attached: 1487125557987.jpg (640x592, 65K)

>Capitalism works to keep economies stable.
KEK
>crisis every 10 years
>stable
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_economic_crises#18th_century

>social displacement
We will literally have to do this in the following 50 years due to ecological changes. See pic related.

W E R F U C K F
E
R
F
U
C
K
D

Attached: 1.png (496x210, 115K)

Remember to stop by the market crash general on /leftypol/ btw

>Marxism is about:
>>fuck laws n borders n shit!
Are you kidding?

This is what Marx wrote on the subject: americanaffairsjournal.org/2018/11/the-left-case-against-open-borders/
(The literal opposite of what you pretend to know about Marxism.)

reported

>I only like the game when I'm winning!
People like you are the problems. Don't blame others if you bite off more than you can chew. Blame your greed and your incompetence. Also your inbred genes.

>if you are on the wrong side of the lottery (90% of the people) you are a retard
Have a (you).

You realize that the entire reason monopolies exist is to rig the game so they're constantly winning right?

Or do you think the existence of monopolies means that what we have now isn't "true" capitalism?

>that image

Ew, go back to your containment board you cock sucking tranny

>Soviet Union socialist

marxists.org/history/erol/ncm-7/cpml-ussr.htm

>Even if state capitalism best describes Soviet society, and this still seems most reasonable, the Soviet Union is, in a sense, a new type of social formation. This means there is a lot of theoretical work to be done, and we can’t wait for someone else to do it for us [lmao]. But we cannot stop struggling against Soviet expansion until we figure everything out. Soviet expansion itself confirms the assessment that the USSR is a class and exploitative society which the Soviet people must overthrow.

Attached: this is what cuckpol actually believes lmao.jpg (1525x1407, 457K)

Pic related is a book that pretty much proves that the "rigged" or "crony" (etc.) "capitalism" concept is a meme which does not take into account the concrete historical development of capitalism itself.

TL;DR: capitalism isn't "rigged"... It's like a game of chess, Risk, or Monopoly, wherein following the rules certain developmental paths are encouraged by the rules of the system, while others are dis-encouraged.

It's not rocket science, senpaitachi. The system hasn't been corrupted, just like a game of Monopoly isn't corrupted just because one or two players become overlords. You could have predicted the outcomes if you looked at the rules. (This is what Marx did in Capital, btw.)

Attached: 71hSCZR9ygL.jpg (1311x2137, 129K)

That,was my point to that user. I was saying monopolies do what he accuses the left of doing and was just anticipating he'd come back with the "monopolies socialist" meme

Why are there no monopolies in crypto then? Despite existing for over a decade and being a completely unregulated market.

If your theory is true, then we would see monoplies all over crypto. But we don't.

There are hundreds of exchanges being created now, more coins gain more market share with each passing year, more and more crypto companies coming out for things like loans, wallets etc.

The entire market is becoming even less monopolised than it's first inception; when it was just Bitcoin (one crypto), Silk Road (one crypto based company), Electrum (one bitcoin wallet), and Mt. Gox (one bitcoin exchange).

>there,isn't a monopoly in it after 10 years therefore your theory is wrong
Do you really think 10 year is a long enough time for a monopoly to develop in such a competitive market?

>there are no monopolies in crypto
cointelegraph.com/news/single-address-behind-more-than-50-of-bitcoin-cash-transactions-report

if you look closely, you'll find this is the case with most crypto
you may not want to believe it, but your opinion is irrelevant
I rest my case

If we were to go back to feudal Europe, your question would amount to:
>how come the East India Company is not owned by the Crown?!
Which, back then, would be a semi-legit question, considering that this very economic development showed how feudal relations were starting to crumble in favor of capitalist relations of ownership.

The problem with your
>implications
is that the systems of bitcunt (etc.) don't really pinpoint a radically new alternative to the already existing system, like the aforementioned example shows. Bitcoin is still coin. "Decentralization" is itself a meme in this context. Big banks and Soros & co. like vultures start to feed upon the format. What made the East India Company unique in its historical context is that you couldn't have had it "monopolized" by the Queen.

In my opinion this points to the fact that we have reached an endpoint in our economic evolution. So called "decentralized" moneys (that still lack USE VALUE, like all moneys before) are still moneys. Their decentralization crumbles, on the one hand, while it becomes a fertile ground for scams.

The real -- Star Trek-tier -- question is: can we move beyond this silliness? Can we have an economy wherein real values are measured MORE objectively, rather than by meaningless papers and tokens?

I think we can.

Yeah, we're fucked. That's why I own enough guns and ammo to force you bastards to pry my assets from my dead hands.

>a revolution is about who owns guns
kek

Communism simply means liberation, the USSR was certainly communism.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3706593