CHAINLINK SERIOUS DISCUSSION

It's come to my attention that we're all severely overlooking a really big problem in relation to Chainlink. What is that problem you might ask? Is it security? Is it private networks? Absolutely not; it's NoLinkers.

What are we unironically going to do with them? We have under 2-weeks before things start to get out of hand. Any ideas?

Attached: 1550388461561.jpg (549x577, 55K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/P_xRboVrYKU
twitter.com/AnonBabble

youtu.be/P_xRboVrYKU

We use them as fodder in the great race war with the promise of 0.001 link per nigger and kike killed

I personally take some pleasure in their kvetching.

We will rule over them brutally.

Attached: 1550387681972.png (624x623, 550K)

Mainnet will do nothing.

>chainlink
>serious discussion
You must be new here

Oraclize dude said Oraclize got a million oracle transactions at 0.02 per call that's 20k total yearly revenue lol

They're operating at a loss and have also admitted that 80% of their customers were just shitty betting dapps, finance and insurance don't give a shit about oracles hahaha

Even if link captures 10m calls per year that's 200k flowing through the network to pay thousands of node operators

And link transactions will likely be even cheaper, minimum 0.01

>muh passive income
Imagine spending 100 bucks building a node and subscribing to api feeds which will give you 10 dollar revenue per YEAR at BEST lmao

Kek!!

>SECURTY
Link still has no mechanisms to provide onchain proof on execution inside a secure environment.

Attached: link no onchain proof on execution in secure environment..jpg (1076x1850, 358K)

fake news literally who article screenshot