Fundamentally, I believe I will fundamentally make it with my 10,000 LINK stack.
Fundamentally, I believe I will fundamentally make it with my 10,000 LINK stack
fundamentally based
theoretically fundamental
WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER
DO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT! ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT!
THIS SHIT IS GOING TO REACH $1,000 EASILY!
HOLD THAT THOUGHT AND VISUALIZE IT IN YOUR MIND EVERYDAY AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE STARTING NOW AND IT WILL MANIFEST INTO REALITY. DO IT! I'M NOT JOKING!
VISUALIZE AS OFTEN AND AS DETAILED AS POSSIBLE!
EVERYTHING IS ENERGY AND VIBRATION
ATTUNE YOUR VIBRATIONS TO MATCH THAT OF MONEY AND IT WILL FLOW TO YOU
MEDITATE DAILY AND VISUALIZE LINK REACHING $1000 IN THE PRESENT MOMENT FROM YOUR HEART CENTER
we're made out of fundamentals
you are a MANIAC
Fuck off back to your troll factory ivan
Shut up you fucking retard.
fundamentaly independently financaly cheesy
Checked
no you (you)
No mechanisms to provide onchain proof on execution inside a secure environment.
>no zorpfle to provide blopping zopum on xenporf inside a lumple daxis
what?
fake news no source
obsessed faguette cuck
Does LINK have a secure mechanism? Please show it.
you are the one claiming it doesn’t and your proof is an unsourced nameless article screenshot lmao fuck off
I'm asking if they do. Simple Yes or No question.
i don’t even know what that is you kike but your proof is absolute garbage posting a screenshot of words and people are supposed to believe you? total kike logic
0.2 iexec have been deposited to your account
You don't know what it is yet you're debating. I don't need proof to say the sky is blue. It's called observing. Observing LINK has yet to show mechanisms for onchain security.
Deflection. Everyone sees you're avoiding answering
You do need proof to properly assert that the sky is blue. A basic observation of the sky is proof, but how can one observe the sky below ground? Or if they were blind?
Further proof would be needed explaining the fundamentals of color and why this makes the sky blue, thus proving it without the immediate observation.
You're a faggot. Anyone with eyes can observe this, and should I read your posts to a blind man he would certainly agree.
1$ LINK TONIGHT
Do you even realize how dumb this is?
TEEs are supposed to be off-chain, that's why they're called "enclaves".
Posting "proof" (attestations) onto a chain that something was executed in an enclave only makes sense from a convenience standpoint. And since SGXs attestations for instance come in via API, writing attestations onto blockchain is child's play for Chainlink.
This is so stupid, it's amazing.
>posting the same whore again
I'm blind and I agree with you assessment of faggotry...any typos are due to blindness
So you want proof on-chain that something happened off-chain?
Would posting the enclave's attestation on-chain via an oracle suffice?
If not, why not?
OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH STINKY LINKIES!
Yes or No?
This seems to makes sense.
It would suffice.
Well good on you for being objective in the end.
Maybe
You could hodl 50k of chainstink and it would sell for pennies on the dollar. Face it, it's a worthless token that was designed as a pump and dump.
>1b supply
>designed as a pump and dump
Would you look at that! The retard figured on how to upload images now.
Yes chainlink uses a P.O.O. (Proof of Obesity) to achieve consensus in addition to TEE (Total Engaging Entertainment) which was purchased from Nintendo.
> Figured on
You have to go back
iexec are french cucks. all of em
Fundamentally, I think so too
Don't you have some 100k circ coin to scam faggot?
fundamentally, its dumping.
Fundamentally I’m financially ruined
please do the needful sirs