I don't KNOW if CSW is Satoshi. I DO know that he is right about Bitcoin being a small world complete graph. THAT is useful information. That is information that convinces me that BSV is the real Bitcoin.
If the courts decide that CSW is indeed Satoshi and/or the Tulip trust was real, that is VERY valuable for my investment. This makes me extra careful. If I am wrong, I will be exposed to lots of risk.
That's why I am here anons. Let's enjoy the never ending ride.
What is ABSOLUTELY undeniable, thanks to Bitcoin, is that whoever holds the keys to "16cou7Ht6WjTzuFyDBnht9hmvXytg6XdVT" signed a message that said: "Address 16cou7Ht6WjTzuFyDBnht9hmvXytg6XdVT does not belong to Satoshi or to Craig Wright. Craig is a liar and a fraud."
This is as true as anything can be in this clown universe.
This document was provided by Ira Kleiman to the Florida courts.
This document was used many times by a lot of different people to call CSW a liar and a fraud.
Remember that Ira Kleiman is suing CSW for potentially millions and millions of dollars worth of damages. It's not reasonable to assume that the document contains the truth and nothing but the truth.
OK, so I assume nothing about the address. What do we know about it and who signed this?
Well. It's clearly not some random OG bitcoiner. Who here can recognize their own address from a scanned copy of a pdf? That's crazy. (especially an address that's been barely used in years?)
In fact, this address has been famous for a while... The plot thickens.
I dont think anyone who isnt paid by roger is staying with bcash. Its hilarious actually. Roger is probably burning more money than calvin lmao
Nicholas Richardson
So, here are two scenarios.
1. CSWIAF Scenario.
CSW is an idiot and went to court without a fucking clue. He just added a bunch of addresses he found online from Mt. Gox incidents and submitted it as part of the "tulip trust". Some dude whose address was on it found it while doing some research somehow or was alerted to it, and signed a message saying CSW is a fraud.
2. Roger Did it Scenario.
Ira Kleiman is an idiot and doesn't understand bitcoin. He faked a list of bitcoin addresses from the mt. Gox documents and submits it to court. Roger knows that they are his addresses and uses this opportunity to sign a message to manipulate the market.
Well, this is where I move on to pure gossip and conjecture, so just dyor on the posts above if you dgaf. Mcafee has long been an altcoin pusher. He actually is not as rich as he likes to make himself out to be. That is why he needs to make money shilling altcoins to fools who think he is a genius vaccine developer instead of an old man gone mad with gonorrhea.
His allies included Jihan and Roger, as well as CZ and voorhees and other such scammers who need this market to keep scamming to keep making money.
Consider the two camps.
CSW & friends = Bsv = Bitcoin. Bitcoin uber alles, we build on a stable protocol
Jihan, Roger, CZ and Friends = We want many coins to compete so we can make money! We will see what shakes out and who gives a fuck about retail investors anyway? Let's ICO with pre-registrations and huge cuts given to "advisors" and "exchanges."
Do you remeber the SNT ICO? what about OMG? What about Kyber? Do you remember what the rush was like to get them tokens for us plebs?
Anyways, Mcafee was buddy buddy with Jihan and Roger, and hates CSW.
This woman is presumably someone who had sex with mcafee for money. This makes her not the most trustworthy person, but mcafee deserves prison for his heinously spelled texts if nothing else.
But hey, these are the friends of Bitcoin Cash and other shitcoins. If you still think mcafee has two functioning brain cells left, you are an idiot. His whole marriage with the black chick = total sham as well. Fuck this space. Fuck personalities. Fuck everything except.....
the Protocol SET IN STONE. Bitcoin solved the byzantine generals problem. Bitcoin is being attacked by byzantine generals.
Men, rally! Look up at the sky - the darkness between the stars - that is Bitcoin.
I agree with your logic about CSW explaining Bitcoin and how it is a small world network and basically everything else he says about it. However if it comes out that he is a fraud there will be MASSIVE damage on BSV, even if it is unironically Bitcoin.
Jason Brown
aye, you speak true
Jace Bell
Well first it IS Bitcoin
But Craig is most likely really Satoshi
Alexander Clark
bretty big if true
Jose Williams
>@officialmcaffee will not come out to speak with local police
kek
Samuel Flores
Based thread, good to see you ABC
Gavin still hasn't disavowed CSW, which says a lot.
Cooper Gomez
There is a chance that the best way to smear bitcoin is to use a pantomime villain, to purposefully generate as much hatred as possible by being an unapologetic cunt for years and create tonnes of enemies while actually speaking the truth and building up what bitcoin is supposed to be. While manipulating the price against it.
This would be a good way to crush the real bitcoin, all that is left has imperfections that can ultimately be taken out in other ways.
Hudson Gonzalez
Note include some obvious lies and perjury to fully destroy their own credibility. Then by association, real bitcoin becomes unwanted.
Joshua Nguyen
Also divide and conquer using forks to section off the true believers.
If bsv dumps because craig lied to destroy it im going all in
I recognise all my addresses. Its not hard to find a small section that looks like a word, or even create one. I have a wallet from 2011 that I know as "Wizard", I haven't used it for years but I would recognise it. Off the top of my head I also have Raise, Pablo, McPooter, Winglet, and my favourite Braap
Xavier Garcia
I haven't remembered a single wallet. I make bulk wallets copy paste. I double check the first and last digits to make sure they match and send the transaction. I also don't even view my public addresses often because I dont have them saved anywhere. All I have are my encrypted private keys (this also means nobody can grab my wallet and see wants on it unless they can break my private key encryption).
Elijah Clark
Then you've never set up a mining zombie net
Ian Baker
>86 gematria says this is a shill/fud/troll
Brandon Hernandez
HTC is decent though? fascinating thread user. keep us updated.
Henry Sullivan
I have a friend who contacted mcafee with his crypto idea. He wanted a 15-20% referral cut for being an advisor and 100+BTC for shilling coins on twitter.
Now he is arguing $500 with a hooker? Where did all that money go?
Think about it. Every fool buying into tron or whatever with high hopes while mcafee dumps the tokens and then does blow and feces and nasty hookers. With the money bizraelis saved from wage labor. With the dreams of ordinary crypto enthusiasts.
This guy deserves jail. Anybody who trusted him lost their money and it is no surprise either.
Ayden Johnson
Fuck. I wonder how much skycoin paid him to get that tatoo on his ugly wrinkled old man skin. Fuck this gay world.
>Who here can recognize their own address from a scanned copy of a pdf? That's crazy. the wallet addresses used in the 'Tulip Trust - real legit, honest Joe' doc were, by need, simply a list of whatever wallets which contained the most coins that could be cobbled together. And by default, these would have belonged to early movers and big hitters in Bitcoin, of whom, there is/was probably no more than a handful. Don't forget, these 'Tulip' docs were never supposed to be made public - unfortunately (for Creg) court made them public record - from there, matter of time till wizsec etc get their hands on them, and the story falls apart. Obv. whoever ACTUALLY owned the wallets will be interested by this point as well, thus. the signed and not exactly cryptic message - 'CSW is a fraud' - what could the ACTUAL owner of the wallets have meant by this? Form here, you have two options: Ira, who knows nothing about Bitcoin and has zero history of doc forgery created the 'Tulip' doc, dug up the addresses, forged the signatures and submitted it to the courts, OR, CSW, who has a history of forgery, fucked up (again) in submitting yet another flaky pile of BS as 'proof' - proof which hes only NOW (15 months later) denying he wrote, AFTER rotw has pointed out at great length, what a pile of horseshit it is. Hmm, Ira, or Creg? Who COULD be the forger here? take your pic.
Or someone who wants to hurt Craig is using Ira Jewman and his Jew lawyers to submit fake evidence to the court that can be used to attack and discredit him in the Jew crypto media. This is by far the most obvious explanation.
Noah Murphy
>#DontTrustVer yes keep throwing the merde around, in all directions. Its now patently obvious to even the blindest man, exactly who sits in the middle of Endless Shit Fountain here so humor me.. why did then would Creg let Ira (and his mafia cohorts etc) submit such a blatantly forged document to the courts in evidence, this with rnd Bitcoin addresses, and Cregs forged signature, etc. - ALL THIS - why then, would Creg wait 18 months before denying its authenticity? EIGHTEEN FUCKING MONTHS. >and we build our castles >in the sand and in the shit
Alexander Cruz
The day of proof can't come soon enough
Julian Wood
>Creg
Did they let you out of the mental facility already O1G?
Jaxson Wright
as the lawyers say - 'facts on your side? bang the facts. Otherwise, bang the table'. Watch you don't hurt your hand now
Justin Wilson
Everything you say is a lie, so kind of ironic that you of all people would use that quote.
I refer you to my previous question. Why then would Creg take SO long to deny the authenticity of this obviously forged Tulip Trust document? Wouldn't be, he sat and watched yet another of his poorly-constructed kites of proof crash and burn, then though ohshit DENY DEFLECT blabla, as fucking per? Won't bother waiting for an answer, need to go - have a nice day down the burrow tho