Craig (aka Pathological Liar Faketoshi) BTFO (again)

Craig (aka Pathological Liar Faketoshi) BTFO (again).

>claims to own some old address that received up to 160595 BTC
>owner of said address signs proof of the contrary

Verify for yourself.

Message (mind the newline): "Address 16cou7Ht6WjTzuFyDBnht9hmvXytg6XdVT does not belong to Satoshi or to Craig Wright.
Craig is a liar and a fraud."

Address: 16cou7Ht6WjTzuFyDBnht9hmvXytg6XdVT

Signature: G39S6i4XsfQnixN5ePMjVPboWvGXdnW8xFFAXiwEriZFCclflbD7umP58u3Sl+dvvXC5BxBrRNkTMNf92O1UIXw=

Attached: faketoshi_btfo.png (1428x861, 198K)

Other urls found in this thread:

nswcourts.com.au/articles/what-happens-if-i-lie-on-a-statutory-declaration-form/
courtlistener.com/docket/6309656/24/4/kleiman-v-wright/
courtlistener.com/docket/6309656/1/14/kleiman-v-wright/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Uhm no sweetie Craig clearly told them a month ago some may not be his

Command line version:

bitcoin-cli verifymessage 16cou7Ht6WjTzuFyDBnht9hmvXytg6XdVT G39S6i4XsfQnixN5ePMjVPboWvGXdnW8xFFAXiwEriZFCclflbD7umP58u3Sl+dvvXC5BxBrRNkTMNf92O1UIXw= "Address 16cou7Ht6WjTzuFyDBnht9hmvXytg6XdVT does not belong to Satoshi or to Craig Wright.
Craig is a liar and a fraud."

Checked. Trips I mean.

lel
craig getting btfo every day on a mongolian basket weaving forum

Wasn't this debunked like yesterday. The adress plausibly belongs to Roger "Prison here I come" Ver.

How people still believe in this fraud is beyond me

nswcourts.com.au/articles/what-happens-if-i-lie-on-a-statutory-declaration-form/

>Going to court for lying in a statutory declaration can be a stressful and expensive experience.
>It is punishable by up to five years in prison, according to the NSW Oaths Act.

Imagine being Stepehn D'Emilio right now

STIFF

Attached: 1503369310583.jpg (1550x1150, 518K)

Mat 21

Attached: images (15).jpg (617x497, 25K)

wow which version is the real one?

Page 38: courtlistener.com/docket/6309656/24/4/kleiman-v-wright/

Page 9: courtlistener.com/docket/6309656/1/14/kleiman-v-wright/

This address appears in documents submitted to courts.

>May 34

look at that declaration, craig didn't state he owned that address. So it's not perjury. What happened is that guy just stated under oath that Craig duped him in 2013.

i know but all by kleiman
i need something to light the fire under sv cucks with

The docs in question are fakes. Craig has never claimed that address and the documents were submitted by the plaintiff through the discovery process.
Jow Forums-lets that don't even know how to do proper research deserve to miss the boat until 1K+. That's you penance for trying to drag the rest of us down like a bunch of retarded crabs.

Attached: disdain4plebs.jpg (400x462, 26K)

don't worry your shitcoin will get purged just like your idol. these being fake or real (as in faked by creg) irrelevant.

CHECKED

BUMP

EAT SHIT FAKETOSHI

Wow, your NPC script is so scare.
Stay poor, late adopter scum. As for me, I will get to enjoy 2011 all over again.

Attached: smugcraig.png (575x642, 464K)

we will see on may 34th

Enjoy being financially ruined. Have a nice life.

Attached: bsv_ruin.png (806x494, 30K)

I could swear that most of these threads are just the same two guys bickering back and forth. Their writing styles are the same across every thread.

who?

Enjoy your blindsided STIFF

Attached: 1558153763995.png (343x9995, 152K)

Only the ones which aren't proved to be not his are his?

Do you believe CSW is able to win the brand war?

apparently
>so am i to understand these are all your addresses?
>that is correct!
>okay, but we know for sure that this and this is not yours.
>oh there might be few that is not really mine honest mistake
>alright but all the rest is right?
>naturally yes all part of the tulip trust
>but this addresses owner just signed you are a liar and a fraud
>oh yeah i forgot about that one that's not mine either sorry
>...