ITS FUCKING HAPPENING
COREKEKS BTFO
>Office took note of the well-known pseudonym “Satoshi Nakamoto,” and asked the applicant to confirm that Craig Steven Wright was the author and claimant of the works being registered. Mr. Wright made that confirmation. This correspondence is part of the public registration record.
copyright.gov
Other urls found in this thread:
copyright.gov
twitter.com
such excite
o mama we gonna make it
>A registration represents a claim to an interest in a work protected by copyright law, not a determination of the truth of the claims therein.
This
>COREKEKS BTFO
imagine the delusion
BSV shills are really starting to reek of desperation now.
How many countdown and it's happening threads do we need?
THANKS FOR YOUR EFFORTS! 2 satoshis (BTC as requested, not BSV) have been deposited to your wallet.
>In the case of the two registrations issued to Mr. Wright, during the examination process, the Office took note of the well-known pseudonym “Satoshi Nakamoto,” and asked the applicant to confirm that Craig Steven Wright was the author and claimant of the works being registered. Mr. Wright made that confirmation. This correspondence is part of the public registration record.
>made that confirmation
>that confirmation
Shouldn't be hard to FOIA all correspondence relating to the "confirmation"
Frankly guys, I'm only two years out of law school but this is not looking good for the Satoshi-deniers. It doesn't really make sense for a scammer to behave this way and get involved with various courts and government offices, which is actually the exact opposite of classic scammer behavior.
Someone should submit a FOIA records request and post the results here.
No no no, a challenger appears
You should drop out of law school, brainlet.
copyright.gov
sorry for your loss
Yeah, except that is literally who. Nobody was talking about that filing back then, but they sure as hell are talking about this one.
I know the herd here seems to have already made up it's mind, but I would honestly be shocked at this point if this is "just a scam" and there isn't more too this. Something just doesn't add up.
people are exiting the market again because of this fucking scammer.
Craig is a glownigger cunt, and all you greedy fucks who bought his BS are going to ride it into the gutter.
slowpoke.me
Me too, Ronald Keala definitely can't be a scam. He's got a paper.
Even as bitoin SV (BSV) enjoyed a Craig Wright/Satoshi bump Tuesday, the U.S. Copyright Office was hard at work dispelling notions that it officially “recognized” anyone as the inventor of bitcoin.
“As a general rule, when the Copyright Office receives an application for registration, the claimant certifies as to the truth of the statements made in the submitted materials. The Copyright Office does not investigate the truth of any statement made,” the Copyright Office wrote in a press release. “In a case in which a work is registered under a pseudonym, the Copyright Office does not investigate whether there is a provable connection between the claimant and the pseudonymous author.”
At least I got in. With reading comprehension that bad, I very much doubt the same for you. Here's a hint:
>two years out of law school
What does "out of" mean?
Wow, great job posting the link to the text I quoted above.
>sorry for your loss
I make six figures and have no stake in this crypto shit aside from what my buddy has invested for me. This CSW drama is really fascinating. Never seen anything like it.
lol, emotion makes people idiots.
>A registration represents a claim to an interest in a work protected by copyright law, not a determination of the truth of the claims therein. It is possible for multiple, adverse claims to be registered at the Copyright Office. The Copyright Office does not have an opposition procedure for copyright registrations, such as the procedures available at the Patent and Trademark Office for patents and trademark registrations. Disputes over the claims in a registration may be heard before federal courts, including disputes over authorship of a work.
this is the important part. creg made the confirmation not the office. and
>Someone who intentionally includes false information in an application may be subject to penalties.
>I make six figures
larp
>have no stake in this crypto shit
sorry for your loss
>In the case of the two registrations issued to Mr. Wright, during the examination process, the Office took note of the well-known pseudonym “Satoshi Nakamoto,” and asked the applicant to confirm that Craig Steven Wright was the author and claimant of the works being registered
Fudding new fags btfo
Wow you sound like such a faggot. Not only are you self absorbed but fucking retarded too. Grats on your scam degree sucking federal court cock. Do the world a favor and kys
>we have confirmation that he did infact file this copyright and these are his claims
Once again
>A registration represents a claim to an interest in a work protected by copyright law, not a determination of the truth of the claims therein.
Either a liar or a brainlet lawyer.
The shit are you reading, faggot?
>"Hi Craig Steven Wright, are you Satoshi Nakomoto?"
>"Yes".
>"Ok then! Registered. If anyone else also claims this, we'll register them too and you can fight it out in court, make sure to use some very expensive lawyers like a good goy. Away you go!"
asked the applicant (creg)
to confirm (just for the record)
that Craig Steven Wright was the author and claimant (of the registration)
but i guess if you are illiterate you can read it like that the copyright office made confirmation of any kind
Thinking I give a fuck to actually read your post and not skim it.
That's the easiest way to summarize it. The important takeaway is that they are very willing to go to court over this.
I am a front desk quant and earn six figures. 70% in BSV of crypto holdings. Don‘t listen to the brainlets on this board.
It's okay to be jealous. I get that a lot. Used to bother me, but not so much anymore.
>Thinks a boilerplate statement by a gov agency is the whole story
Survey says: unlikely. Besides, the fact that whatever functionary typed that up doesn't want to over-represent the authority of their agency doesn't mean that you can easily speculate on the nature of the "confirmation."
larp
Based
AMA. Currently working on a calibration model for local volatility.
>The claimant certifies as to the truth of the statements made in the submitted materials.
>and asked the applicant to confirm that Craig Steven Wright was the author and claimant of the works being registered.
It doesn't take speculation, did you even read it? He is not required whatsoever to give hard evidence and they are wouldn't investigate it either way. How the fuck are you a lawyer?
Did you seriously fall for CSW's fabricated proof and the story of his "doxxing"?
When they litterally state that they did not.
>The Copyright Office does not investigate the truth of any statement made.
Cregjeets BTFO.
Kek! Too stupid to realize he is seen as a cancer of society. I made my living curing cancer in a lab and here you are spreading it arrogantly. Truly you don’t understand or read when others sincerely suggest you kys.
I don‘t care too much about the CSW story but more about the BSV tech. I see a lot of potential in on-chain scaling. The possible upside is crazy, definitely worth a gamble. Most of my portfolio is in stocks/bonds though.
OK then, I see
If the governments' statements and actions were 100% straightforward there would be no need for people like me to exist. Anyone who has ever tried to file paperwork more complicated than a tax return knows what I'm talking about. What the bureaucrats write in the normie-facing instructions is never the full story and you often have to have special knowledge or experience to get things processed smoothly. Any statement that reads "in principle..." or "in general..." is especially suspect in this regard.
Again, someone should just FOIA the relevant docs and see what CSW gave them. I would be shocked if it was just "I am Satoshi, trust me." He probably submitted some kind of signed statement by someone credible as that is usually what Hermes Conrad wants before he gives you his rubber stamp of approval.
interesting that large blocks dont actually offer better overall scaling than hierarchic sidechains its just less secure and less flexible.it will take a decade for this to be determined.
>you're claiming that you are "satoshi nakamoto"?
>yes
>ok, heres your copyright registration
guess he was satoshi all along
>rich guy willingly perjures himself and goes to jail for the next 20+ years
guess he's a dummy
>rich guy
a paid larper under investigation by ATO
>goes to jail for the next 20+ years
never gonna happen for larping as an internet personality, and he knew it
The thing is that Satoshi would never do this.