Why aren't big companies announcing that they use link? I thought this was supposed to happen after mainnet announcement

>listen to me guy'ze, I know better than Swift, Capgemini, Gartner, etc.
Banks and major businesses will adopt anything that increases their bottom line through automation.
ESPECIALLY if it's remotely IT related and they can outsource it.

Stinky

Sorry sweetie they posted the blog post today and announced s partnership with crypto kitties and some alarmed clock company

This

This is eth mainnet not "the" mainnet. Still 2 to 3 years from singularity.

Imagine using a discord where you literally have your own little picture attached to your account, lmao, holy fuck

SWIFT is doing a last little dance before its death. SWIFT is fucking dead. In 2 years time they'll be completely dissolved. The ECB, FED and IMF have already identified, long ago its replacement. The head of swift after getting cucked out the company got laughed at in his last conference for the shit he said. SWIFT my ass you dumb faggot.

ChainLink is shit.

Thanks sold 650 million.

What the fuck did any of this cunt's post even mean? Did you respond to the wrong post, faggot?

>Multi billion dollar companies hate money
>that's why this thing will never happen
>except it is going to happen in ten years
>same difference
>poop tastes good btw

>Swift is dying so Chainlink is shit
Aside from the fact that Swift is getting bigger than ever, you're a retard.

Also, smart contracts have the potential to eliminate middlemen like banks, insurance companies, ... as they can create financial products on an entirely peer-to-peer crowdfunding basis.

Also also, what about Capgemini, Gartner, WEF, ...

t. xrp nigger

They suffer the same problem as all cryptos, they have inly convinced the mindless sheep that it works and they haven't convinced anyone with half a brain

Linkies forever btfo

Nobody trusts Turing complete smart contracts, you moronic bastard. Were you 12 when the DAO happened? You probably were. That trust takes time. Imagine being so fucking dumb that you hinge a multi-billion dollar company's finances on lines of code not having a single exploit. Do you dumb cunts know anything about software development? Including you? No, both of you aren't even techies. You got interested in crapto less than 5 years ago. Both of you couldn't write a fucking Hello World program, and you're high off Hopium laced with Dunning-Kruger.

Complex pieces of software with zero exploits, made by man, do not exist. This is an idea neither of you, or any other of you bobble head ChainStink morons can understand because you're not techies, you're not programmers and you're not CS/EE students. No fundamentals whatsoever. I can see it, I can see neither of you have any real idea of what you're talking about at the technical level.

Get off my board and take your shitty ICO scam fatty with you. I'm glad I got to educate both of you at least.

Why haven't any companies announced they are using http for their websites?

sorry user, it's happening whether you like it or not
your crappy pajeet tier company is gonna get left behind

>Nobody trusts Turing complete smart contracts
Smart contracts are simply a combination of computer programs.
You know about computer programs right?

Also, untold millions have been generated with smart contracts so far, people trust them fine.

>Complex pieces of software with zero exploits, made by man, do not exist.
Is that why the entire financial industry runs on (third-party) software?

>linkies r stupit
no u

>Imagine being so fucking dumb that you hinge a multi-billion dollar company's finances on lines of code not having a single exploit.
All of global finance hinges on lines of code, lmao

>Smart contracts are simply a combination of computer programs.

Look at this dumb skidmark trying to sound technical for a change and getting it wrong on the first step. They're not 'combinations' of programs, the fuck are you talking about? You just described something akin to an operating system such as GNU/Linux LMAO. A smart contract is a protocol which executes terms of a 'contract' for given inputs. Stupid boy.

>Is that why the entire financial industry runs on (third-party) software?

The dunce just equated proprietary closed source software overseen by man to autonomous algorithms released open source into the digital wild. This is the average intelligence and tech prowess of the Link token holder.

>such as GNU/Linux
oh look it's a freetard

>They're not 'combinations' of programs
But they literally are.

>b-b-b-but I meant proprietary closed source software overseen by man!!
1) no you just said "software"
2) banks use tons of open-source software too, starting with their Linux servers.

It's going to be really entertaining watching the "there is no market for smart contracts" crowd stand on the sidelines while the trillion dollar smart contract market takes off.
Maybe you can start a new Jow ForumsButtcoin but for Chainlink, and whine about it while the rest of us get rich.

Wtf!!!

>Jow Forumsfartcontracts

this person should've gotten zero (You)s and yet you all responded to his bait

Approved

Is it possible that we are being played by a venture capitalist? Pic related.

Attached: IMG_9107.jpg (750x999, 76K)

Hey, that's the guy who fucked my mom

No, I don't wear glasses.

Daddy?

Because it comes up with warnings to anyone who goes on the sites

Https is the one that websites use
That’s what an ssl certificate is for

most logical conclusion:
big companies are not using it

>Smart contracts are simply a combination of computer programs.
jesus christ. sell signal

>if I say Turing complete a few times they will think I am not a brainlet

This

>Bill Gates: "Hi, I'd like to announce Best Buy is using Estes Freight to deliver laptops with our software on them."
Imagine the retards that think any major company that uses chainlink is going to announce it. You will SEE it if you USE it. You had 2 years anons.

That's literally what they are.

Unless you're trying to say Solidity for instance isn't a programming language.

this guy is big time though
that doesnt mean big time guys dont try to fleece anons, but he is big and his company is going to be huge (docusign)

>triggered
He meant you discord transvestites are a bunch of literal faggots. He replied to the correct post. Faggot.

>the internet is simply a combination of some computer programs

>In this interpretation, used for example by the Ethereum Foundation[3] or IBM,[4] a smart contract is not necessarily related to the classical concept of a contract, but can be any kind of computer program.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_contract

Nicd blog post faggot

Attached: 1558619094251.jpg (960x916, 601K)

Imagine putting your foot in your mouth, and then shooting yourself in that foot.

He got in at 15 cents and is literally unloading his millions on us right now for an 8-bagger.

Imagine having to literally fud SWIFT in order to fud chainlink at this point kek. It's satisfying seeing just how far the goalposts have moved for link fud since 2017

That fag is fudding "software" to fud Chainlink too.
There have been tons of people fudding "Intel", and even "data sources" to fud Chainlink.
It's pretty insane.

>It's satisfying seeing just how far the goalposts have moved for link fud since 2017
Haven't the goalposts been always the same? No one uses smart contracts or even need them thus chainlink is totally useless.This is the reality unless you can name some companies that utilizes smart contracts in some useful way.

Banks don't publish their working source code to function real-time on a decentralized computing platform for everyone to pry at you fucking mongoloid. Can you spot the difference between any two systems whatsoever? Ok, you don't know the literal definition of a smart contract, that's fine you can drop it. Even the other unwashed Link veterans are cringing at that one.

There is no trillion dollar smart contract market. Learn business and learn law. Society isn't going to shift accountability overnight for things running the globe to autonomous code only to have something fuck up and having some neckbeard in an office go "Uh.. well, sorry I guess but it wasn't my fault they found a loophole!". Things involving lots of money and contractual agreements involve humans, as intermediaries. You don't know shit about anything in the real world because you're a shut-in teenager.

>dur whys he talking about crucial things y cant he speak in vague terms like me, y u got to talk bout technicalities in a tech project wots rong wiv u man

Neck yourself, cretin.

>'FUD'
>SWIFT

This is how I know, definitively that you're both underage. When you're a grown up like me and you've sent money all round the world, from the US to fucking Africa to Asia, you can attest to what an utter fucking disgusting shitshow SWIFT is. You're both too young to understand. Nobody likes SWIFT.

Here's something non-technical which you and your 80 IQ peers would easier comprehend; The circulating supply of LINK is 350 million tokens. There is a total in existence of 1 billion tokens. Sergey Nazarov holds 650 million LINK tokens, almost double the circulating supply.

How can you be so utterly fucking stupid? This isn't even a technical matter this is just fucking third grade math.

YOU'RE GOING TO GET DUMPED ON BECAUSE SERGEY OWNS 65% OF LINK TOKENS. ONE GUY. 65% OF ALL THE LINK.

CENTRALIZED SHITECOIN
EVEN WORSE THAN RIPPLE'S 40%

nice reddit spacing

>No-one uses automobiles, horses do the job just fine. It will never take off.This is the reality, Henry, give up your dream

There's no such thing as Reddit spacing. Reddit didn't even exist while I was double spacing here. Single spacing is for mouth breathers like yourself. Quick reply box warrants double spacing.

Don't you ever sell your Link. I want to watch you upload ever single pink wojak jpeg and flood the board with pink you tech illiterate overgrown cumshot.

>Banks don't publish their working source code to function
Banks use metric fucktonnes of open-source saas.
Even their Cobol backbone is on life support from open-source solutions.

You're an idiot.

>You don't know shit about anything in the real world because you're a shut-in teenager.
I literally have a law degree lmao
I'm not even going to argue with you. No argument will be more compelling than just letting you watch as the inevitable happens.

>When you're a grown up like me
And old man stuck in the past telling us it cant be done. Innovation is impossible.

Give me a real life example of chainlink's use case and tell me how much money it will save.

Whale Killer didn't say, but highly implied, that a major partnership would be announced next week right before mainnet to cause link to be the first project to pump on mainnet

Two events with zero familiarity. Classic Linkie intelligence.

Institutions steal and modify FOSS shit all the time, how long did it take you to Google something which kind of looked like it reaffirmed your ideas?

>I literally have a law degree lmao

Its so useless that you've had to resort to buying a chubby Russian guy's 65% centralized shitcoin. Are you from Brazil or something?

Innovation is all around and changing the world. My sole point is that ChainLink and smart contracts are not it. You think that's even on anyone's radar while we haven't even finished the fucking cryptocurrency race yet. There's still no adoption. No real actual adoption. We need to finish that first. When everyone in the nation uses cryptocurrency and understands it, we can perhaps look into automating basic things, not fucking billion dollar insurance companies.

What other linkie morons want to get spanked while I'm still awake?

>Banks don't use open source
>Banks steal open source
Both of these are you.
And they definitely pay for their saas, you have no idea.

Keep spouting nonsense, you're a walking talking buy signal.

Do you realize there wont be adoption through just tokenization? Its too limited, just read some reports from the isda

>When you're a grown up like me
I was following up til this point, daddy

Also, typing GNU/Linux makes me believe you are probably a butthurt sysadmin with alcohol problem and no family in his LATE 40s that regrets not getting into bitcoin early.

I've been doing consulting work in the banking industry for 2 years you troglodyte, I dont claim to be an expert in legacy finance, but the fact that
>nobody likes SWIFT
doesn't mean the swift wont be an important component of international transfer for year to come. None of my firm's clients are going to move away from it anytime soon. What I do know is that literally all of our banks have been demoing smart contract trials since 2016, wouldn't you think they'd appreciate an easy way to interface them with their legacy systems?

>Its so useless that you've had to resort to buying a chubby Russian guy's 65% centralized shitcoin. Are you from Brazil or something?

A friend of mine is in continental level management of big4 overseeing credit risk management, working on math automation.
His job is to oversee automation of bulshit jobs for third party corporations.
He is also heavily invested in Link

Real progress comes in small steps.
>eth mainnet + dApp partner nodes
we are here
>eth 2.0 scaling
>SWIFT, derivatives, legal contracts, IoT
we are going here

Just be patient

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-05-20 at 8.17.51 AM.png (700x504, 50K)

How heavily?

6figs

based. do you post on Jow Forums per chance?

I'm 6 figures that doesn't mean anything

But you are not automation expert on credit risk management

He must have a stack that's 500k + then if not he's doing it wrong

>REAL adoption is being able to buy onions on Amazon with my nano

lmao so you're just a troll then

My dad works at nintendo and told me that they are implementing smart contracts in the next mario game checkmate linkies and no linkies alike

Link is going to be $10000 EOY and Sergey will become the richest man in the world

Screencap this

td.mediaroom.com/2018-09-12-TD-Bank-Group-and-The-Hydrogen-Technology-Corporation-announce-North-American-agreement-to-bring-automated-digital-investing-solutions-to-TD-clients
They wont announce using LINK, theyll announce using the partners. Using LINK is lile using HTTP

this

>What I do know is that literally all of our banks have been demoing smart contract trials since 2016
I do not buy this for a second. That a lie.

im a 4 year software developer, have been in crypto since 2012 and im all in LINK, now what you buffoon?

Attached: 467429666546909185.gif (128x128, 33K)

>nobody trusts Turing complete smart contracts
I don't think you understand what Turing completeness is because you just threw it into your retarded ramblings for no reason. Multi billion dollar companies already trust Turing complete languages since almost everything except HTML and CSS are. See:
>C, C++, C#, JS, Java, Python, and every other modern programming language

Attached: 1537587409105.jpg (645x729, 81K)

>been in crypto since 2012
how are you not rich lmfao

This jackwad Fudder doesn't realize Swift likely owns most of that $650mm Link. Lol

You know the DAO that idiot mentioned as a reason why link will fail? well i ate the fud when it was hacked and dumped my entire ETH stack that i bought for almost nothing, would have been sitting on millions rn if i didnt.

just goes to show, like eth didnt die when the DAO was hacked, whatever insecurities happen we'll figure out how to deal with them and move on.

Attached: sv2prti.png (392x370, 208K)

cringing @ (You)

Please, do not post if you don't understand what smart contract is.

>whatever insecurities happen we'll figure out how to deal with them and move on.
No one lost any real money or value in DAO hack. How do you think stock market and owners would react if their company operates on something that cannot be reversed.

That's not the only option. Reversible transactions are possible with smart contracts and a decentralized Oracle network.

>banks use tons of open-source software too, starting with their Linux servers.
Because you work in banking computer systems, right user?
You don't know shit. Banks use PAID custom unix software for their servers, not free-shit variants flowing on the interwebs. You get laughed the fuck out of the room if you brought up using RH/Cent in a banking environment.
>t. contract networking engineer, with experience in banking networks

No they are not. That is not how decentralized blockchains work. You can not reverse e.g. ethereum smart contract execution.

He's right though.

So banks don't use Linux servers?

He isn't talking about reversing the chain you retard.