Are you ready for Coingeek Conference Toronto May 30-31, Jow Forums...

Are you ready for Coingeek Conference Toronto May 30-31, Jow Forums? The rumors has it Craig will reveal it ALL in a fireside chat with Jimmy

Attached: Capture.png (843x769, 1.06M)

Other urls found in this thread:

craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/satoshi-and-the-sophists/
youtube.com/watch?v=OdQYhKanInI&feature=youtu.be&t=39
bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/op-ed-how-many-wrongs-make-wright/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

I really don't understand, everytime I come to this board someone is shilling SV.

Craig Wright is a psychopath, you really dont need to be a doctor to see it. There is no way, absolutley 0, that this guy is Satoshi.

Look at this scamming chink face
pretty sure he's a pedo too

wish I could see your face when you realize how wrong you are

craig is a pathological liar and a psychopath

Maybe if you did more dyor and less listening to Greg Maxwell and his sock puppets you would come to another conclusion? Just a thought

Coingeeks first 'North American' conference - in Canada, where we (maybe) don't all have outstanding arrest warrants. Altho, Ayre was also banned from being involved in a company even there, I believe. Good to see he doesn't bear any grudges. Otherwise, they'd have ran out of potential host countries altogether. Next year, Antigua, for the convenience of all the impromptu citizens of that fine and fortunately not overburdened with extradition treaties island

>Craig Wright is a psychopath, you really dont need to be a doctor to see it. There is no way, absolutley 0, that this guy is Satoshi.
Satoshi could easily be a psychopath. Gavin says the personalities match and he isn't the only one who has seen him sign with satoshi key in private. Who the fuck keeps 5% of total supply for themselves? A megalomaniac that's who. What is Craig? That's right.

I think Craig is both satoshi and a liar and scammer and a psychopath and I think bitcoin and all its versions are trash and Craig must be stopped.

Take the real blackpill. Craig is satoshi, and satoshi needs to be stopped.

>I really don't understand, everytime I come to this board someone is shilling SV.

they are paid pajeets

>Craig is satoshi
No matter how many times you repeat this shit, its never going to be true. N E V E R.

Let me guess, you are Roger Ver? I'm not saying you're not right, but could you please expand on what he is lying about and why he must be stopped?

You are an enlightened one.

This, Craig has a massive marketing budget from his BTC/BCH/BSV warchest

>Craig is satoshi, and satoshi needs to be stopped.
Nice try kike. Literally the opposite is true.

Attached: 1513510519926.png (227x222, 71K)

>could you please expand on what he is lying about and why he must be stopped?
A lot of minor shit and some medium shit, like the copyright debacle, him changing his forum posts back at the start of bitcoin a few years ago, saying he has doctorates degrees in things he actually has degrees in, but they are masters and bachelors degrees (why even lie about that?).

He must be stopped because his vision and goal is a dystopian de facto fascist if not even neo-feudalist surveillance society. Attempting to use patents (state violence) to stifle the rise of alternative systems is abhorrent. He doesn't want to capture value just based on merit, but rather he also wishes to leverage a great deal of force to achieve his ends.
Dumb corecuck.
I'm sorry libertarians, but it's true. Bitcoin seemed like it was the chosen one, but it's just not going to work. On-chain scaling for the demands of the DeFI economy isn't going to work and truly trustless and the potential for censorship resistant 2nd layer scaling has been purposefully made difficult to do if not impossible by design (see LN, blockstream's sidechains and every other offchain scaling attempt). This is the real reason why the bitcoin devs rejected Vitalik's proposal to upgrade bitcoin with better smart contract capabilities. He then went off and made ethereum.

Thanks, m8. I don't agree to any of what you said, but really apriciate it. About the degrees, you can download a list of all his diplomas and certifications on nchain. The blogpost was, according himself, to throw off wired who was about to dox him as Satoshi. The copyright and patents is because of how btc was subverted by people who want to turn it into an user coin that is suitable for criminals (both individual and governments). That goes against all he believe in and I'm with him on that point. A society without law and regulations is not a society.

>He doesn't want to capture value just based on merit
On the contrary. You should read his latest blog post:

craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/satoshi-and-the-sophists/
>It is the world I seek to bring into existence, one built on time-tested values. A world of inclusion based on merit.
>Bitcoin is set in stone, and it is the only way to allow it to grow and for businesses to accept it, and importantly, it is the only way to have a system based on a meritocracy develop around Bitcoin.
>Bitcoin is a meritocracy

As you can see he is all about merit. You know proof of work. How do you think he was able to climb the ladder from growing up with a poor single mother to a billionair?

He himself claims to have used a third party to spend bitcoins. In essence disconnecting himself from the blockchain. He was also moving money away from Australia because he essentially didn't like the tax laws and he's hoping he can somehow change those laws. In what way does that show him being a law abiding person? I truly hope you're a paid shill and not believing that bullshit.

When I talk about not wanting to capture value based on merit, I mean that he doesn't want his system to compete with others based on merit. He wants to shove it down the world's throat.

The question of whether the system itself if implemented globally would be a meritocracy is another question. Btw are you Ryan?

youtube.com/watch?v=OdQYhKanInI&feature=youtu.be&t=39

Attached: 1milliongigamegs.jpg (1280x720, 106K)

Attached: Manvinder.jpg (640x640, 38K)

>he's hoping he can somehow change those laws
I have never heard him say that. Do you have a link?
>In what way does that show him being a law abiding person
Every law abiding business man will try to maximise their profit and minimise their tax whitin the law. Doing else would be kind of strange would it not? In a socitety we have a set of rules we agree to follow. We compete within that framework. Everyone is welcome to limit themself by setting arbitrary rules for themself, but that will of course impede your ability to compete in said society.

>I mean that he doesn't want his system to compete with others based on merit
Well I don't really agree with that. He says he welcomes competition, but what he does not want is people copying his creation, turn it into a crime coin and sell it as the original. He never started patenting before that happened.

>Btw are you Ryan?
I'm just a nobody from Norway, but I must say I'm flattered :)

I would have to dig for them. If you read through his medium page he makes himself look like a complete hypocrite in my opinion. Yeah but using shell companies to break the spirit of the law is still shady. I would never listen to a person like that. That's not even mentioning the fact that he's losing the hash war on something he claims to have created.

>He says he welcomes competition, but what he does not want is people copying his creation, turn it into a crime coin and sell it as the original.
He hasn't threatened only claimants to the bitcoin name though. he has threatened every other blockchain and essentially says "i have a monopoly on this and things that can be built on this and I allow this monopoly to only not exist for projects that build on BSV".

He also spits in the face of nakamoto consensus by threatening to use law enforcement as a tool of (his) governance of bitcoin. He is inconsistent in his positions (assuming he is satoshi) and he is an enemy of free enterprise.

An enemy of the freedom to create alternative economic systems that rely on decentralized public ledgers that aren't BSV, that is.

>what he does not want is people copying his creation, turn it into a crime coin and sell it as the original.
Well then he should have applied for a patent and not made it a public thing. By his own words, if he's Satoshi, the "true Bitcoin from a hardfork is the one that wins the hashwar". If he loses the hash war he should basically have to give the copyright on the Bicoin name also.

It's anons larping as shills. Obviously.

bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/op-ed-how-many-wrongs-make-wright/

>Yeah but using shell companies to break the spirit of the law is still shady. I would never listen to a person like that.
I've read most of his medium posts and he does not come off as a hypocrite to me. I understand what you mean with the above wuote though, and why you don't fancy it. Still, I personally think it's ok. If society deem that way of structuring finance, then laws should be imposed to limit it. However, as it stands today, it is totally legal. Not doing this would give him a unnecessary monetary loss, and for what? So that a few bleeding hearts would approve of him? It would in a sense be the same as donating your savings to the government. Would you do that?

>He hasn't threatened only claimants to the bitcoin name though. he has threatened every other blockchain and essentially says "i have a monopoly on this and things that can be built on this and I allow this monopoly to only not exist for projects that build on BSV".
He has been very clear and vocal about the importance of only one public global ledger. If you split into several blockchains you make it less secure. That's why he goes after other blockchains, but at the same time he says anyone can build on bsv even if it violates his patents. He only enfoce the patents on other blockchains, not bsv.

>He also spits in the face of nakamoto consensus by threatening to use law enforcement as a tool of (his) governance of bitcoin. He is inconsistent in his positions (assuming he is satoshi) and he is an enemy of free enterprise.
He has been very consistent about the fact that code is not law, and that bitcoin has to operate within law and society, not outside. Law is fundamental and a very important part of the civilized world. It is what sets us apart from animals and the countries in Africa. Blockchain does not change that.

I have to go, but it was nice discussing with you. Made me think, and that can't be bad

Why are you still here you fucking shitlords

It's about 50% paid Pajeet shill army, 45% trolls, and 5% actual legitimate retards who are dumb enough to believe Craig

In the end I don't really care that much. I'm just saying that if even a tenth of the things said about him are true, then he's a fool. In the end litecoin will prebably benefit the most from this shit show. I like BCH but I'm gonna move into LTC a little more now. I guess the lesson here is to never trust a round eye to create your crypto! lol

You do know that Craig will give most to the bitcoin association to create a better world, do you?

>It is what sets us apart from animals and the countries in Africa.
That's funny because he was using the tulip trust third party to spend bitcoins in Africa.
>He has been very clear and vocal about the importance of only one public global ledger. If you split into several blockchains you make it less secure.
Satoshi said that whoever wins a hash war from a chain split is the true bitcoin.

Attached: Satoshi.png (425x397, 345K)

no this psychopathic retard said julian assange should rot in prison

he is a psychopathic nigger who wants a fascist surveillance police state

>thinking the hash war is already over

The hash war is finished when the BitCoin forks consolidate to one chain.

No. It's when one of them dies. It's like you tards don't even know about the things Satoshi talked about.

homos spreading the aids/hiv

lol

Attached: enjoy_your_aids.jpg (462x579, 54K)

lol no creg is a full out psychopath homosexual, it's really not hard to notice that.

he needs to be stopped so he doesn't do any damage to btc, no one sane gives 2 shits about bsv or anything else.

The death of a chain is the consolidation you god damn retard.

Death means one is just abandoned. That doesn't mean forks "merge" back into the original. Nice try though faggot.

What obvious faggots

Death means there is noone mining it anymore because the hash consolidated to one chain you fucking brainlet. necc yourself low IQ faggot

>he needs to be stopped so he doesn't damage muh btc

Attached: 1543594146628.png (205x246, 6K)

Greg! how are you ya fat fuck? going to kill yourself yet?

No it does not have to consolidate to one chain. And it does not mean that the loser has to join to the other chain, dipshit. Your original implication was that the forks will have to return to the original chain.

I really don't understand, everytime I come to this board someone is shilling SV.

Craig Wright is a psychopath, you really dont need to be a doctor to see it. There is no way, absolutley 0, that this guy is Satoshi.

Attached: 190FCBA8-6711-4708-9DBA-BD9702EBD57F.jpg (1080x1020, 72K)

You know it's just to fud the king Bitcoin?

yes

CAN YOU STOP SIMPLY REPEATING POSTS WITH le funny meme pic ADDED ?
you fucking BSV shill pajeets are cancerous enough already

Reveal what? That he is lying cunt? Yeah we know that already.

>AN YOU STOP SIMPLY REPEATING POSTS WITH le funny meme pic ADDED ?
>you fucking BSV shill pajeets are cancerous enough already

Attached: 2AF8BC56-35FA-4048-AA8A-A732DECDF152.jpg (988x1059, 148K)

I wish we had flags on Jow Forums but you can't have it all

the exact opposite
Craig should be encouraged to continue, full speed ahead
and he is not the user of the 'moniker' satoshi

As Hal once said on Bitcointalk:
"what does the S stand for?"
anyone with half a brain can guess right what does the S stand for

>wish we had flags on Jow Forums

Attached: flags_for_biz.png (413x511, 124K)

He meant does the S stand for shit?