The copyright office also clarifies that CSW opens himself up to criminal charges should he have falsely made the Bitcoin claim.
Update: CSW paid not $35, but $1600 to get his Bitcoin copyright granted
Christopher Clark
Other urls found in this thread:
copyright.gov
twitter.com
Julian Martin
Literally who?
Benjamin Butler
Well, it's not like it's possible to legally prove that someone is NOT Satoshi.
Kevin Wilson
that's where your wrong kiddo. Bitcoin is crytography. the way you prove ownership in a cryptographic system os by signing. wich he cannot do..
Hudson Nelson
I said 'legally'.
Carter Thompson
I hate Craig threads, but god you're dumb.
Dominic Johnson
>SIgN tHe KeYs
>No Key nO oWneRsHiP
Absolute state
Oliver Bailey
i heard he held the nazis back alone at the battle of BULGE...
he also has won the nobel prize all of them in fact several times
not many know that he is actually nikola tesla who discovered the secret of eternal life draining energy and vitality from the void
he also holds every patent on earth because he bought all patent offices
he had more lovers of all sexes than zeus himelf
he personally shot jfk for being a filthy socialist
he is also claimed to be the last starfighter at least nobody could ever disprove it.
truly amazing guy
Jose Martin
that is how things work in a court of law. you can't just say you invented shit without proof.
Evan King
PS it's the best $1600 ever spent.
Evan Rodriguez
I guess you can
Ryan Bailey
In my mind it's pretty obvious that the bitcoin creator would have the keys, I don't know about you.
Logan Walker
>copyright.gov
Wrong, Satoshi can sign a message with genesis block private key or with his PGP private key anytime (well, atm he cannot since he is locked up in jail).
CSW will never be able to sign one of the two.
That's the entire point of cryptocurrencies.
Private key = ownership
>I said 'legally'.
Asymmetric cryptography has legal value you retard, that's the entire point of something called "digital signatures".
>SIgN tHe KeYs
Sign WITH the keys, fucking retard, you don't even understand basic cryptography
Luke Cooper
Yes, you can prove you're Satoshi, but if you're granted a bullshit copyright, there's hardly any way to legally dispute your claim of being an anonymous creator
Matthew Bell
It's a bullshit and useless copyright, literally no one cares about this fraud and patent troll.
It doesn't prove anything since claims are not verified.
BTC has a MIT license, so there is literally no point of copyrighting it, except for fraudsters to pump their shitcoins.
Anyone falling for these smoke and mirrors deserve to lose their money.
Joseph Ramirez
no you
Jason Turner
So I am Satoshi and BSV is the new official currency of India, which is going to be a superpower by 2020
>this post will be copyrighted within 5 working days
Easton Clark
>thinks a copyright filing is the same as making the claim in a court
Asher Butler
who?
Grayson Jenkins
Colton Gray
no btc is copyrighted from the get go it was just never registered this registration is bullshit as btc copyright includes all documentation which includes the whitepaper under mit licence. cregs boomer tricks gonna bite him im the ass.