HAHAHAHAHA LET'S LAUGH AT THE LINKIES IT'S OVER HAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHA LET'S LAUGH AT THE LINKIES IT'S OVER HAHAHAHA
Dylan Jenkins
Eli Diaz
I don’t know what any of this means but I’m never selling
Dominic Gutierrez
Thomas would snap they guys neck if he dares to question chainlink again
> New system new rules faggots
Grayson Carter
why didnt any of you retards question this before. i am financially ruined.
Brayden Wright
ask*, faggot pajeet
Gabriel Powell
that pic is like half a year old, lmao
Swingies getting desperate.
Elijah Bennett
>he wont have his smart contract keeping an eye on the LINK price
brainlet OP. its not up to chainlink to add that functionality, thats up to the contract coders.
more lame fud.
Isaiah Murphy
ooooo strap in boys
this literally means that chainlink can never go down only up after mainnet
ooooooooooooooo
Cooper Myers
this
Hudson Davis
even more hoops for companies to jump through. its fucking over.
Jayden Green
More likely link will be a stablecoin that cannot be dumped.
Connor Young
Still not selling you will never get my stinkies.
Justin Brooks
Imagine you want to stake 1.000.000,01 usd but solidity cannot handle decimals hahaha linkies are btfo
Noah Williams
Yes, a brand new kind of stable coin, pegged to the price of $1000.00 a piece.
Caleb Reyes
Shouldn't the staked LINK only come into play when the contract is triggered, so there is only a fraction of a second exposure to volatility. certainly not at the beginning of the 5 year period
Michael Wright
yeah it's old as shit just like all the fud that's been circulating the past few days. swing linkers aren't creative enough to come up with any meaningful or creative fud. probably because they're low iq enough to swing their ticket to freedom
William Ross
Yes except solidity is autistic and will reeee if you use decimals.
No reason for link not to be worth enough to cover the spreads and differences especially when it achieves mainstream adoption
Nolan Howard
Here is how to solve the problem:
1) dump LINK and give it a meme use case (like voting on the protocol evolution)
2) use an actual stablecoin as collateral
Elijah Smith
Oh you're not selling, but it's not that you don't want to sell, it's that no one wants to buy your StainStinks.
Parker Lewis
yeah SOL doesn't allow decimals but atomic units make the fud irrelevant. i don't even get why people keep parroting it
James Young
brainlet no-linker here
can you explain/expand on that?
Sebastian Harris
isn't penalty set in real dollars rather than link? Link is just a collateral
Sebastian Smith
I don't know Im asking too, If the staked Link is exposed to 5 years of volatility in the case Op stated it simply will not work. you would have to state the penalty in usd dollars at the beginning and then its calculated vs LINK at trigger moments
Nathaniel Bennett
It's a good warrant canary as to the state of the brainlet nulinkies.
Joshua Hernandez
pure soilent. name is even more retarded than that pose
Gavin Cruz
Based
Jordan Campbell
The FUD gets more inane by the day.
Levi Richardson
Wait, so anyone with a contract insured with link has a vested interest in keeping the price high? Which they can do by buying more link? Thanks for the shill post.
Leo Phillips
The solution is obvious, the goal is to prevent price decreases withe smart game theory and a proper network effect.