WE TOLD YOU SAMSUNG IS PARTNERING WITH CHAINLINK BIZ ABD HERE IS THE PROOF
SERGEY COPYRIGHTED “SMART CONTRACT”
SAMSUNG SPECIFICALLY MENTIONS “SMART CONTRACT” ON THEIR WEBSITE NOT SMART CONTRACTS IN THE GENERAL SENSE
SAMSUNG WOULD NOT VIOLATE A COPYRIGHT
WHICH PROVES SAMSUNG AND CHAINLINK PARTNERSHIP IS HAPPENING AND WILL BE ANNOUNCED AFTER MAINNET
Imagine believing this
Kys u homosexual loser
*shits myself*
poo poo pee pee
No, he fucking copyrighted literally 'SmartContract' i posted this in the other thread and you even took that screen from my post where I explained this. Are you purposefully fucking with me or is this an attempt at irony?
consider deleting this please
this is clearly a fud disguised as shilling. newfags dont fall for this, linkers aren't actually this retarded (okay some may be)
who gives a shit? calm down.
T. all-in link
Smart Contract will be considered a copyright violation of SmartContract no matter how you want to paint it
I can’t open a business called ShakeShack and copyright that name if Shake Shack is already taken, that’s a copyright violation and I would be sued
So either the Samsung and Chainlink partnership is real, or Sergey could sue Samsung for copyright violation
Which do you think is more likely user?
The latter. Remember this?
They changed it immediately when notified.
So if I make a fast food restaurant named GoodBurger. I can sue whoever uses Good Burger in a sentence? I don't think it's that easy user
Now there might be a chance that it's actually chainlink because Samsung didn't change it after they were notified. If the user actually contacted them and didnt forge the email.
But I'm still leaning to it being a whoopsie
Wasn't this changed to chainclear or something?
No you fucking brainlet but you can sue them if they opened a business company or product called Good Burger
Which is basically what Sergey could do unless there is a partnership
Smart contracts were a thing before Chainlink you know.... Samsung can therefore use "smart contracts" however they want, because it's just two words that describe a feature.
Or else Sergey should've sue all the other block chains that use smart contracts
It was. As soon as some of our autists contacted them asking what it was
IIRC, barring the name change, wasn't it confirmed this had nothing to do with chainlink?
They didn’t though
They used “Smart Contract” and not the general use which would indicate there’s a partnership or a copyright violation
If you really think Samsung is dumb enough to violate a copyright lol
They never denied it
They just said to wait for an official announcement before speculating
Rory can't deny it because he's not in the inner circle anymore. Information is tightly controlled and often it's a case of no-one knowing except for Sergey.
Correct.
It has nothing to do with chainlink, rory i think even confirmed it and FNZ then changed it.
Shit happens all the time in large companies such as Samsung where bosses at one end have no idea what the other side of the company are doing.
>Get notified
>change "Smart Contract" to "a smart contract"
>crisis averted
Don't get me wrong though. I want it to be true, but this is not at all proof of anything
He was asking about FNZ chainlink