Bitcoin Turing Complete

200$ end of week

Its a multi day conference happening in toronto almost exclusively for bsv focused on scaling

>bitcoin is Turing complete using our custom, arbitrary definition!
>the mainstream definition is actually WRONG

Attached: 27623328.png (500x373, 93K)

Do you write some wicked, Turing complete HTML, user?

>what do
you should invest in some plumbing you larping streetshitter

HTML5 and CSS3 combination is Turing complete. CSS alone is not Turing complete. Again, know what you're talking about brainlet.

Hey, you can add your cope conditions to it all you want, but it doesn't change the facts.

HOLY SMOKES

Attached: craigsfinalform.jpg (696x449, 55K)

g-guys...what exactly is going on here?

Attached: nervous.jpg (232x217, 9K)

who the fuck cares it's irrelevant

For Turing completeness, you need 1. composability of functions with recursion allowed, 2. if-clauses and 3. while loops.

If you allow for while-loops, it's hard to not have your language be Turing commpletew. (Indeed, people have written differential equations solvers in LaTeX.)

Not being Turing complete is also not bad, academic languages like Agda aren't Turing complete, for example.
And generally, if you know what you want to do, having a nice Petri-Net model of computation makes for a non-Turing complete model with lots of nice properties that any Turing complete language doesn't have (i.e. various properties of algorithsm are decidable.)

Attached: malpignose.jpg (1080x1350, 64K)

checked. literally just bought 800 bucks worth on robinhood

you mean you haven't bought yet???

Attached: FINAL COMBAT.jpg (1279x723, 685K)

I, too, am turing complete

Attached: pqafkb6d9ba01.jpg (645x729, 57K)

Satoshi will make ALL the announcements May 31st. Swimming against this current will be futile.

During the fireside chat with Jimmy, Craig will lay the foundations for all of his extraordinary claims, which will include posting independently-verifiable documents and evidence addressing some of the false allegations that have been leveled, and transferring bitcoin from an early block.

There will be extraordinary proof that can be independently validated regarding the Segwit flaw. Similarly, Craig will also discuss the fundamental flaws with privacy coins, such as Zcash & Monero. This will effectively kill "privacy coins" as Craig will show you that it is basically as private as running through Times Square with your pants around your ankles.

Craig will also expose the pure fraud that is binance. He will discuss how these bucket shop exchanges are all squarely within the realm of US control. To say so is not a mere assertion, ‘.com’ domains have been considered to come under US territory for decades now. It is well tested in law. All major exchanges, including Coinbase, will be immediately forced to remove the bitcoin moniker from BTC/BCH/BTG/BTCP and all the other scam forks that have deviated from the whtiepaper. This will all be legally enforceable by his recent copyright approval.

During a Q&A Dr. Wright will also be asked about the court proceedings vs Kleiman's estate. At this point he will reveal irrefutable proof that the TulipTrust is in fact real and the accurate name that Satoshi gave to his enormous stash of bitcoins. Craig will demonstrate how he will take sole possession of the TulipTrust in 2020 once the contract reaches maturity.

Listen, I genuinely care about Anons well being. Cryptoscammers have been trying their hardest to suppress the coingreek conference bcuz On May 31 there will be a sea of red across the board, with the exception of one coin that will rise from the red ashes like a phoenix. That coin is original bitcoin BSV.

Good shit, just market dumped 150bch and market bought 550 bsv at finex. Got 300 more bch ready to dump on confirmation.

Checkers

holy fuck
>t.175 bsvlet
i have 1 btc, should i convert? i like to hedge also why were you such a bcash maxi?

Smart man.

Attached: bsv.jpg (339x428, 27K)

Checked

Imagine not understand the difference between theoricial vs practical

Bch carried the original bitcoin torch until they fucked it all up by kicking nchain out to pursue bitmains wormhole bullshit.
Now that torch is carried by bsv and with no one to hold them back they're leading the space with the only metric that matters, scaling. Personally I'm already all in on bsv. The 450bch is a family stack I'm converting over more conservatively.

>just unroll ur loop
but i wanna loop forever
>no u dont stop doin dat

what a mong

LMAO, so when you're unable to do loops with an unknown number of iterations, they call it Turing-complete? I can't believe this shit, seriously

>waiting for confirmation
user that is corecuck thinking. Dr. Creg and BitCoin are 0-conf secure. all in now before you miss the 1000x

checked. flippening confirmed.

Attention cucks, I demand everybody to have skin in the game, let's fight this out the way it is supposed to be done. Poloniex offers margin short and long on BTC/BCHSV trading pair. If core cucks are so sure CSW is fraud and bsv will die, short the fucker. If CSW brainlets are so sure CSW is Satoshi and BSV will annihilate BTC core, long the fucker.

sounds like fun

I mean I think this is gonna be a pretty easy swing trade but I don't know what will happen after this week

bowmain.co.uk/BSV/Hello_language.html
>Hello is a very simple High-Level Language. It is intended to help development of complex scripts by replacing the forth-like syntax of bitcoin script with the more traditional syntax of Hello.

i've been shorting and it hurts.
the problem is u got reddit plebbits buying and that CIA cunt handler of his dumping market buys 8 figure sizes

>coingeek ongoing
>two gigachad blocks in July
Enjoy liquidation.

>shorting BitCoin
Enjoy poverty

Attached: 37689413-8A36-45BD-8BCB-5C1E2F7DDC60.jpg (640x296, 17K)

Rollin for 6,5,2/1s
Miners can't accept looping forever

Then don't call it Turing complete. As simply as that. As said, not being Turing complete is not necessarily bad. However, lies and deceit turn people off.

there isn't a computer in the world that can loop forever. eventually the power turns off or the software crashes or the battery dies or the hard drive fills up etc.
there is no such thing as the idealized perfect academic turning machine with an infinite tape.

You don't have to loop forever in practice. It's the duty of the programmer to make sure the algorithm stops at some point. However, you might not know in advance how many iterations it would take.

did u even watch the video? you can loop like this in bitcoin, just keep looping as long as you can keep paying for the transactions.

The way you pay for execution is extraneous to the algorithm itself, it has nothing to do with Turing completeness. I.e. on a normal computer you pay for electricity too, but it's still Turing complete.