LINK BLOGPOST LEAKED

pic related

Attached: 1559155330305.jpg (1472x844, 232K)

>Why do I actually believe this larp?

so you put some logos on a word document, printed it out, and took a picture on your phone in poor lighting to make it look real

I can also do all of these things

now fuck off

Attached: 1510513785048.jpg (618x597, 64K)

larp + belief + link bags = c o m f y

Alright pajeet, lets see what you can do.

It will be deleted just watch

wth... i'm in for one last biz larp ride... grabbing popcorn

this post was in another thread and got deleted immediately, someone may have given a peek. I dont think we've ever seen this slide before, and it looks like this is what the blogpost would be. im not larping im just a link holder of 15k links, ive given everything up in my life, 15k links is literally all i have to my name

Attached: mf6vjFGr.jpg (1456x1941, 198K)

This isn't a Mumbai Municipal Potty Training Academy of the Farts and Sciences Certificate Of Potty Training Completion we're talking about here pal.

your subconscious remebers it from the recent sergey presentation of which you could remember not being able to see what was written on the projector due to poor camera angles

Attached: 793A94D8-E161-4EFB-A866-74B59CD844B9.jpg (640x627, 504K)

Consider this.
Link is down -10% when just 4 sentences from the blog post got leaked.
What do you think will happen when the entire post comes out, which will likely contain more than 20 sentences? This is going to dump to sub 40c.

thanks. still selling.

why does that change anything?

If I was trying to LARP my balls off, I would also delete the post to make people think it was a real leak

also, the fact that

Attached: 1513099456284.png (645x773, 21K)

*that its been posted over and over, probably by the same guy, is telling

You do realize that all these are just logos and the text of the "leak" doesn't mention partnerships in the slightest?

But still better than
>down -10%
>which is up 10%
Checked and keked.

Already sold, don't care. Enjoy your crash, linktards

Enjoy your AIDS, nigger.

If quints this post is legit

>not knowing it will pump to 5$ in 12 hours, idiots.

this was the post, it was deleted from the thread of a whale larping trying to scare us

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-05-29 at 3.47.02 PM.png (1416x260, 109K)

COPE

Attached: 1558193768588.jpg (840x544, 62K)

nice reasoning, sold 100k

It was posted before this earlier maybe 5 hours ago, as the start of a thread, and file was deleted

got the waruso link of the thread?

bump that

No warosu but i have link
Pic is fhere if you go down a little bit

I leaked that OP
DELETE

Attached: rotate.png (619x501, 22K)

thanks fren

bump, fuck link swingers

COMPANIES
LIKE
SWIFT

bump FUCK LINK SWINGERS

>-6.71%
it's over lads. we had a good run. all that's left to do now is drink our own piss and look forward to a life of rude health. cheers!!

I SAID FUCK LINK SWINGERS

Bump FUCK link swingers.

Attached: 1558620244615.jpg (589x2244, 493K)

Yeah

ITT: linkers don't know what chainlink is supposed to do.
If you have a trusted data source like Bloomberg or Citi chainlink is useless, because they self-sign their data. There's zero reason for them to use chainlink.
The purpose of chainlink is to ferry data from unsigned data sources to the chain. That's all.

THEY GET PAID TO PROVIDE THEIR DATA TO REQUESTING CONTRACTS.

which doesn't need chainlink or staking nodes. All it requires is paid access to their api (that generates signed data).
Even if chainlink - the open source library part, not the network - is used to generate that self-signed api - it's completely irrelevant to the token, as it doesn't even enter the equation.

it absolutely needs chainlink, or something like it, to provide data to a decentralized network in order to trigger smart contracts. i think your problem is with the decentralization part and it not being necessary, but it will be in order for on chain event transactions to take place.

also that is what the 350 million link is for. given out to these data providers as collateral to provide accurate data as the network economy develops.

Checked!!

Attached: IMG_20190529_160655.jpg (1024x498, 55K)

>What do you think will happen when the entire post comes out, which will likely contain more than 20 sentences? This is going to dump to sub 40c.

if it got that low again i'd pump it to 5 dollars with a fomo market buy

checked, need a link to the video fren

Even if this leak is true, it could just be Sergey listing examples of companies that can potentially provide those kinds of services...if you notice the companies in that leak are the same ones on the Chainlink website's infographic.

>it absolutely needs chainlink, or something like it, to provide data
why? there's nothing gained compared to sending a transaction yourself.

SHIT ITS NOT THE BLOGPOST

to create a liquid, decentralized market of securitized trust with every possible thing that can be digitized.

sauce?

Certain it's one of his tired lecture slides
> It's all so tiring

damn if that slides already out and it impresses the fuck out of me than i hope the actually blogpost will rip my pants off

Lol you guys are the biggest faggot in crypto. Literally salivating over a blog post by some bigger faggot. You'd probably let Sergey plow your fucking ass you giant faggotrons!

youre right i would

100% sergey could hit, is that even a question?

Yes it should feel like Sergey is raping you rent free in a dark alley that's so dark you cannot find your pants afterwards.
T. No pants

Attached: 1559104334800.png (750x1189, 129K)

Thanks Adelyn. Very cool

Anyone not gladly willing to give up his poop shoot to sergay is a massive homosexual

Based Nopants

Hur dur and how would that data get on chain you fucking retard

by sending a transaction with it