Announcing the First Chainlink Marketplace

Bump

the absolute state of stinkies
a "decentralized network of oracles" got degraded to a marketplace of centralized oracles (with kyc), and they're happy about it.
Fucking pointless payment token.

Attached: 1535215902695.jpg (1016x795, 99K)

4000 sats or worse by next month. The project is possibly dead in the water after this knowledge.

Sybil attacks are possible since sybil resistance requires KYC or "trustworthy" node operators. Most people won't KYC because it's antithetical to the idea of crypto itself being decentralized and "anonymous". Therefore, since most operators won't want to KYC, LINK will not be sybil resistant.

Now why does RLC make LINK obsolete in this regard? It's simple. The PoCo algorithm is so well designed that iExec's dOracles can rely on it instead of KYC for sybil resistance.

Boom. I sold all of my LINK at 1.40 because I knew after RLC v3 dumped, that even LINK would dump.

I will not be buying back after learning this. I am all in RLC at the price of 0.43$, about 0.7x ICO price.

Sorry gentlemen, I thought LINK was going to save me just like all of us did, but this is the nail in the coffin.

Attached: 1558047075089.jpg (1653x2341, 549K)

4000 sats or worse by next month. The project is possibly dead in the water after this knowledge.

Sybil attacks are possible since sybil resistance requires KYC or "trustworthy" node operators. Most people won't KYC because it's antithetical to the idea of crypto itself being decentralized and "anonymous". Therefore, since most operators won't want to KYC, LINK will not be sybil resistant.

Now why does RLC make LINK obsolete in this regard? It's simple. The PoCo algorithm is so well designed that iExec's dOracles can rely on it instead of KYC for sybil resistance.

Boom. I sold all of my LINK at 1.40 because I knew after RLC v3 dumped, that even LINK would dump.

I will not be buying back after learning this. I am all in RLC at the price of 0.43$, about 0.7x ICO price.

Sorry gentlemen, I thought LINK was going to save me just like all of us did, but this is the nail in the coffin.

Appreciate the hard work guys

Attached: link 3d.gif (212x212, 1.69M)

BART LMAO

no one that does KYC is going to sybil attack the network you fool
also KYC is not a big deal unless you're a scammer or drug dealer

rlc is just french vaporware with fake parterships
you motherfucking iexecucks need to fuckoff with your lies

N-no, Chainlink is just a m-meme r-right??

Attached: 1545150811104.png (646x595, 280K)

>also KYC is not a big deal unless you're a scammer or drug dealer
chainlink with kyc DOESN'T MAKE SENSE.
The whole point was to have a decentralized network.

I can register a company "Chad Oracle LLC", put my photo in the about page and contractually oblige myself to produce correct responses.
It has literally the same security as current link oracles, except I can accept eth directly, rather than a worthless erc20 payment token.

I mean you can’t make this stuff up, your name is Bart OP. You know what’s coming for LINK

So Hudson was right, chainlink didn't even attempted to solve the oracle problem, just made another service of oracles for literally who's and no adoption whatsoever

more iexecucks

NO ONE IS GOING TO TRUST ANONYMOUS ORACLES that's why KYC is essential for chainlink to succeed

there are ids on this board you faggot, I didn't write anything about iexec
>NO ONE IS GOING TO TRUST ANONYMOUS ORACLES that's why KYC is essential
the absolute state

>NO ONE IS GOING TO TRUST ANONYMOUS ORACLES

What the fuck are you talking about, do you even understand how any blockchain works, what is the main selling point of cryptography or even bitcoin? holy fuck

Jesus christ, look what selling at 11k has done to this cucks brain.

>Most people won't KYC because it's antithetical to the idea of crypto itself being decentralized and "anonymous".

So all this butthurt about KYC is just crypto fags fucking seething. I can pretty safely say that a large portion of the Link investorbase doesn't give a fuck about the rest of crypto. In fact it's embarassing. I remember saying about 9 months ago that Link needs to be removed from Binance because the association with crypto is hurting it, it should be listed on a fucking proper stock market or something.

If KYC is what is keeping you out of Link, I am glad it's filtered you fucking crypto cucks. Fuck off with yout shitty PnD's scams and retard figureheads like Craig and all the other faggots. Bitcoin is going fucking nowhere. Bitcoin will be remembered as having only one usecase, it was used to buy Chainlink sub $1. That's all.

Look at this stupid faggot
iExec has the only true decentralized oracle. Chainlink's KYC is DEATH

I am not an expert on these things by any means so please someone smarter than me correct my line of thinking if need be.

Since there is currently no reputation and penalty system in place I could pretend to be a reputable data provider, which regardless of any “legal” issues I may eventually face, would thereby provide less incentive for large data providers to actually sell their “service” and use the network at this point. Assuming we have high value data providers ready at this stage in the game, this makes sense. If we don’t, I’m not really sure why Sergey did this. If he’s expecting the network to grow from community support this would not be the way to go.

>Most people won't KYC because it's antithetical to the idea of crypto itself being decentralized and "anonymous".
hahaha stopped reading there

It’s not secure

man yall niggas are dumb, right now there's no reputation and staking, the eth gas is too high for adoption, there's no sgx or alternatives to sgx, they were always gonna start the network with a handful of trusted nodes, the whole point of link is to create a network effect that's appealing to enterprise users, it won't be trustless from the start, just like right now enterprise still prefer to use private chains instead of ethereum.... they're doing exactly what they need to be doing, for the customers, not for the muh ideal tech autists... the point is to evolve the network gradually and slowly, then as the network takes shape and the new features get implemented you'll also see third party solutions, third party rep, third party listing services, third party marketplaces etc.... the point of kyc vs not kyc, kyc by chainlink or kyc by third parties, or eventually trustless alternatives to kyc... options options options, customers will pick whatever suits their needs and demands.... it's also clear jonny's marketplace is gonna be the fird haven for neet nodes, while chainlink itself will foremost focus on trusted nodes by reputed businesses and data providers... just read the roadmap for future features jonny posted, it's gonna be huge... you have to be such a brainlet not following what's happening to not see the behemoth it's shaping up to be... by 2021 there will be hundreds of nodes, dozens of third parties, plenty of staking pools, listing services, certification and reputation providers, shit like honeycomb and nodary, easier access to high value data and adapters for neets, plus actual big names like docusign and swift eventually launching their nodes... even a small neet tier pool entity like sdl just casually mentioned they were getting interest from the biggest bank in australia to provide their banking data.... the network effect is gonna be insane once they open the banking outputs gates, but keep falling for low tier fud

I bet the_crypto_oracle wrote this

>blockchain
blockchain != blockchain middleware
try work in finance without ability to check you for AML/CTF
why do you think banks and governments are anti btc but ok with other blockchain projects like jpm coin

like it or not, there is a system for a reason

Based post. Fucking this. The network is gonna snowball.

user post these when we’re bwdk at 8k
Let the dump get there

>Fell for the meme meme is a meme meme

Wow Bart, looks like you guys are really fighting back after being MOGGED.

Then why doesn't a big Co buy CL ?

Attached: 1536244707156.jpg (1125x1281, 400K)

Absolutely based

they have. did you think that sergey actually wrote the white paper? he's just a pretty face, a puppet of the bankers.

This is extraordinarily based.

Attached: 1558891987115s.jpg (250x250, 6K)

I wish he were a puppet..
But I highly doubt it.
Anyways, I am looking forward to that day, when some big Co buy CL

>people unironically don’t hold LINK

>holding link

Attached: dropping_link.jpg (867x901, 231K)

Your whole rebuttal DOESN'T MAKE SENSE

Attached: DhAV6QkUcAAsNxi.jpg (1080x1640, 148K)

Attached: 1524444896423.jpg (1341x1252, 320K)

Its bought by swift and built out further by one of the starts from JPM you dunce.

this. businesses doing multi million dollar widget xactions wont trust user to do the right thing. they need someone to sue.

t. lawfag

>Implying chainlink partnerships are real
If SWIFT was hoarding chainlinks we would have known by know don't you think?

Attached: 1455124145468.jpg (960x625, 232K)

So Swift didn't have Chainlink do a poc for them?

how the hell is this decentralized if linkpool is a centralized organization wtf

NOT FUCKING SELLING

Pretty sure they'll be given a decent amount from the 300(maybe 350) fund and not buying on binance.

they will test the shitty mainnet, see that it is completely useless and then dump their chainlinks on tards like you. Truly a win/win partnership.

Attached: 1466696586020.jpg (500x375, 173K)

>you don't seem to understand the difference between decentralized and distributed.

do some google research about the difference, also have ssex incel

>being this retarded
Thanks for the reverse psychology Chainlink shilling.

Yes, that is exactly what'll happen. Yep. Keep coping.

Attached: AUTISTIC.jpg (600x600, 43K)

Being anonymous =/= decentralized

You can still have a decentralized network without anonymous

>chainlink with kyc DOESN'T MAKE SENSE.
KYC is an option.

And it makes perfect sense actually. Especially for major users/clients.

4000 sats or worse by next month. The project is possibly dead in the water after this knowledge.

Sybil attacks are possible since sybil resistance requires KYC or "trustworthy" node operators. Most people won't KYC because it's antithetical to the idea of crypto itself being decentralized and "anonymous". Therefore, since most operators won't want to KYC, LINK will not be sybil resistant.

Now why does RLC make LINK obsolete in this regard? It's simple. The PoCo algorithm is so well designed that iExec's dOracles can rely on it instead of KYC for sybil resistance.

Boom. I sold all of my LINK at 1.40 because I knew after RLC v3 dumped, that even LINK would dump.

I will not be buying back after learning this. I am all in RLC at the price of 0.43$, about 0.7x ICO price.

Sorry gentlemen, I thought LINK was going to save me just like all of us did, but this is the nail in the coffin.

Based pisslord

Wait a minute there nolinker, you're telling me that

>despite hating LINK you monitor the price religiously and make a thread as soon as there is any movement
>develop novel and intiutive FUD plotlines using the most up to date information you constantly seek out
>dedicate your creative energies to editing maymays with LINK branding
>have LINKtrader, GitHub, Gitter, pivotaltracker bookmarked so you can keep up to date with the project you hate
>actively participate in a LINK discord or telegram group
>know more about LINK than any other project, even more than stinkylinkies themselves

You need to have sex incel

They are, they are just trying to fud for accumulation.

Who you think sold that $3m Link seconds after blog post? Ask yourself who was buying all of them. I would suggest same group that bought them trying to create panic sell off, and it worked. Many on here are justed waiting for another drop to get back in. Protip, it isn't happening, fomo back in or miss future gains.

Yes sir. Link is stupid. Buy BTT sir.