So all this butthurt about KYC is just crypto fags fucking seething...

So all this butthurt about KYC is just crypto fags fucking seething. I can pretty safely say that a large portion of the Link investorbase doesn't give a fuck about the rest of crypto. In fact it's embarassing. I remember saying about 9 months ago that Link needs to be removed from Binance because the association with crypto is hurting it, it should be listed on a fucking proper stock market or something.

If KYC is what is keeping you out of Link, I am glad it's filtered you fucking crypto cucks. Fuck off with yout shitty PnD's scams and retard figureheads like Craig and all the other faggots. Bitcoin is going fucking nowhere. Bitcoin will be remembered as having only one usecase, it was used to buy Chainlink sub $1. That's all.

Attached: 1556539159031.jpg (800x1281, 713K)

Other urls found in this thread:

github.com/zack-bitcoin/amoveo/blob/master/docs/other_blockchains/chainlink.md
blog.chain.link/threshold-signatures-in-chainlink/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

its not secure

Posting in epic thread
Include me in the screencap

Attached: 1536927309008.jpg (1508x892, 557K)

man yall niggas are dumb, right now there's no reputation and staking, the eth gas is too high for adoption, there's no sgx or alternatives to sgx, they were always gonna start the network with a handful of trusted nodes, the whole point of link is to create a network effect that's appealing to enterprise users, it won't be trustless from the start, just like right now enterprise still prefer to use private chains instead of ethereum.... they're doing exactly what they need to be doing, for the customers, not for the muh ideal tech autists... the point is to evolve the network gradually and slowly, then as the network takes shape and the new features get implemented you'll also see third party solutions, third party rep, third party listing services, third party marketplaces etc.... the point of kyc vs not kyc, kyc by chainlink or kyc by third parties, or eventually trustless alternatives to kyc... options options options, customers will pick whatever suits their needs and demands.... it's also clear jonny's marketplace is gonna be the fird haven for neet nodes, while chainlink itself will foremost focus on trusted nodes by reputed businesses and data providers... just read the roadmap for future features jonny posted, it's gonna be huge... you have to be such a brainlet not following what's happening to not see the behemoth it's shaping up to be... by 2021 there will be hundreds of nodes, dozens of third parties, plenty of staking pools, listing services, certification and reputation providers, shit like honeycomb and nodary, easier access to high value data and adapters for neets, plus actual big names like docusign and swift eventually launching their nodes... even a small neet tier pool entity like sdl just casually mentioned they were getting interest from the biggest bank in australia to provide their banking data.... the network effect is gonna be insane once they open the banking outputs gates, but keep falling for low tier fud

Chailink stocks? But then Sergey would be charged with fraud when he exit scams.

based

link is only good for public data that makes it practically useless

Holy shit based

coke ramble no ones going to read your copy paste blog
send it to your mom

>I’m a brainlet
The posts

>im a grown adult collecting disability checks living with my parents
see what i did there

Chainlink is McDonald's of oracles - a franchise.
One day, Sergey was sitting in a McD, eating a bigmac, while reading about oracles on a smartphone - his two favorite things in the whole world.
Suddenly, he had an idea - McDonald's + oracles = a franchise model for oracles!
Thus Chainlink was born, changing the life of thousands of neets forever.

Attached: 1545539908767.png (1121x707, 411K)

Next month 4000 months or worse. After this information, the project may die in water.

Sybili attacks are possible because Sybil's resistance requires KYC or "trusted" nodes. Most people do not have KYC because it is against the idea that encryption is decentralized and "anonymous". Since most companies do not want KYC, LINK Sybil is not resistant.

Why does RLC LINK make this part obsolete? It's easy. The PoCo algorithm is so well designed that iExec dOracles can use it instead of KYC instead of SYIL.

Boom. I sold the entire LINK 1.40 because I knew that even though the RLC v3 dump was opened, even LINK was offered.

I'm not going to buy that hour. I'm all $ 0.43 RLC 0.7x ICO.

Sorry gentlemen, I thought LINK would save me somehow, but it's a coffin.

Epic well spoken based and redpilled

Attached: 1559360392374.jpg (986x995, 154K)

Chainlink is trash github.com/zack-bitcoin/amoveo/blob/master/docs/other_blockchains/chainlink.md

>coding bootcamp projects are more complex than pic related
VITAMINSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

Attached: vitaminssss.png (2368x1386, 346K)

It's just hilarious that fudders actually try to use the (optional but encouraged) kyc option as a point of FUD.
> HURRRR IM GOING TO BE PART OF ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT FINTECH PROCESSING BACKBONES ON THE PLANET WITHOUT ANY ID
Banks and corporations were never, ever going to allow that. This was already discussed previously as a likely possibility - and Sergey knew this too.
My chainlink erection only grows harder as the fud grows weaker. Eventually I will have enough money to backtrace the IPs of all nulinkers and nolinkers on this site and have them abducted and put into a breeding zoo so that I can dump pozzed loads into their retarded asses.

fudders are playing both angles:

>hurrrr kyc is mandatory meaning Chainlink is not decentralized!
>durrrr kyc is optional meaning Chainlink is not secure!

They've really been going all-out.

Explain how chainlink is going to go anywhere if bitcoin isnt and eth network goes down every time a new kitten game is released.

>public blockchains are the only ones

Attached: 1534995206442.jpg (756x1118, 211K)

Chainlink is helping solve ETH's scalability with threshold signatures.
Thousands of transactions can be rendered onto the blockchain as a single transaction.

the amount of copy pastas in this thread. not even the same people who made the original post and they don't even know what the fuck it means. if it's the same people it's major link holders who are just spreading memes and confusion. carry on

>Chainlink is helping solve ETH's scalability
'Theoretically' or actually?

>incoherent dribble

Well Chainlink is only just on its initial release, but they've really fleshed out the threashold sigs already: blog.chain.link/threshold-signatures-in-chainlink/
Keep scrolling.

Pretty sure they have tons of features nearly ready to go.

im so ready lads. if i can even make a modest sum out of this i can establish myself in the right direction. i believe in chain link!!!!111 haha yahooo!!! what wallet do you guys use to hold your stinkies btw?

Attached: 53f.jpg (196x250, 8K)

It's blockchain agnostic so the safest method is 10% on an eth wallet 10% on a btc wallet 10% on a monero wallet etc that way if one gets hacked you still have the others, btw don't forget to lock in the price

No large corporation is going to use services with a company that doesn't complete due diligence on subcontractors they use, especially the financial sector. See Dodd Frank brainlets. This is bullish af for Link, they are the real deal.

Consequences will never be the same