You can actually run neetnodes there. Unlike in chainlink where you can only run nepotism nodes. You need some in-group schmuch (((reputation provider))) to decide that you are upstanding citizen who is allowed to run nodes. Why would reputation providers risk their own reputation by listing your stinky neet node?
Attention Stinky Linkies. Reminder that Witnet will have algorithmic reputation
Elijah Allen
Jonathan Miller
witnet more like brainlet
Grayson Smith
you dont seem to understand that chainlinks goal isnt need nodes, chainlink will power iot, smart cities, insurance banking an derivatives, their goal is to have enterprise grade oracles.
im not even sure you can get jobs if youre not a moral ebtity like a company.
thats why chainlink is huge, its not some backyard miner thing. chainlink is thhe very first bluechip crypto
Austin James
Have sex Adnan
Zachary Adams
One of these sounds autistic, the other sounds like it'd be adopted by major businesses.
Oliver Torres
No.
Hudson Nelson
Are you scared for your bags, stinky linkie?
You know Timo & other deluded fools are full of hopium shit regarding what treshold signatures are, right?
What hypers think they do: Aggregate and scale anything somehow magically.
What they actually do: When multiple nodes have the same job, instead of reporting their data independently to the blockchain with a giant tx each, they can communicate with each other and reach a treshold of agreement (and data/node availability) (for example: 2/3) on what the correct data is, and then it can be signed by them and one sends it on-chain to the requesting smart contract, making it much much less expensive to receive data from multiple nodes.
>chainlink will power iot, smart cities
No lol. Not cost effective enough.Not even close.
>insurance banking an derivatives
Yes.
Not sure if your post is veiled fud or just naive/magical thinking that comes with low (the average linkie) technical understanding of how it works.
I'm not Adán and I agree that he should have sex.
In truth, reputation providers requiring KYC on nodes and excluding undesirables from even trying to prove their reliability probably does mean businesses are more likely to accept it.
The only way normal and degenerate bizlets have any hopes of earning link with their link is via staking pools that are (((approved))). It is unlikely that one will be a given a chance to prove that one's own node(s) will be reliable at all.
When we were loosely told about how reputation would be via reputation providers / node listing services, all of what is revealed lately and all that I said in this thread was entirely predictable.
Liam Gray
That was kinda poetic. Thanks for buying my bags!
Ayden Allen
I agree with this. My sense is that Chainlink is deliberately not a real crypto. It's an attempt to control the oracle space before a real crypto takes over.
The purpose of Chainlink is to maintain control by large corporations. Therefore it's not structured like a real peer-to-peer because it doesn't have to. It's goal is to prevent that from happening.
So, even though, Chainlink is a fraud. It could still moon considerably.
Jason Gomez
With Chainlink you can use any reputation contract you want and can build them yourself.
Read the fucking white paper.