Quant ruins the whole value proposition of blockchains

Quanties think they are the next TCP/IP to rule the world... delusional from the start.

They so desperately want to be loved by Jow Forums and long in the Quamfy lounge to takeover Chainlink... never gonna happen

They think Chainlink can't connect blockchains together... but it can and so can so many other protocols with much more determinism, less trust, and cheaper.

The whole point in using a decentralized backend like a blockchain is to get deterministic services, yet they think using a trusted software to run all your transactions through is logical. In fact, it ruins the entire value proposition.

They think of themselves as the blockchain of all blockchains yet it's proprietary software and you need to pay a license to use. Again, it doesn't make sense to use proprietary software to leverage decentralized backends.

Quanties give up already.. it's pathetic.

Also, please get out and have sex already.

Attached: quant the scam.jpg (249x144, 5K)

ok this confirmed it im going allin

Not everything needs to be 100% decentralised. if that were the case then we should just quit now, cos nothing is truly decentralised - not even bitcoin.

quant niggers eternally btfo

True, but that's why you have current digital agreements. Current digital agreements work on trust. The whole point of a blockchain is to get rid of trust, which is why it makes no sense to use quant with a decentralized backend.

It makes sense to the companies/governments already using Quant

SCAM

Terrible post

You mean testing Quant.

Something to take into account is that most powerful industries are still clinging to private blockchains and private middleware like Quant, just like companies clinged to Intranets and were afraid of cloud servers. They might view Quant right now as interesting, but they will be wrong in the medium to long term. Industries are already starting to come around on this, as all the value in in public, open source systems. EY recognized this already.

Sounds like you should have sold before Link mainnet

Sounds like you have no argument

You don't seem to understand how OverLedger works.

Sounds like you speak on behalf of all enterprise and governments around the globe

I’m not here for the tech, I’m here for the money. Do you know why chain link pumped and dumped recently? Because of mainnet. Crypto is a game of speculation. Once you understand that and focus on factors which drive price, and spend less time arguing about muh adoption you’ll spend less time being poor. Link is dumping and won’t recover for a while. Qnt has bottomed and about to take off. Buy qnt or stay poor. It’s as simple as that.

I know exactly how it works. Contribute something of value if you are so enlightened.

Explain to me then why you would use a decentralized backend using centralized software? Why not just go with current digital agreements?

>Link is dumping and won’t recover for a while. Qnt has bottomed and about to take off. Buy qnt or stay poor. It’s as simple as that.
based, let the fags argue about irrelevant details while we pull a clean 20x before EoY.

this is the shit you post when you didn't sell LINK at the top, and start getting emotional AF. staygay faggot

>Explain to me then why you would use a decentralized backend using centralized software? Why not just go with current digital agreements?

Explain to me why you're actively turning down a clear 50x opportunity over some irrelevant technical bullshit no one fucking cares about even slightly?

Chainlink is like AOL. Nice run, time to move aside little fella

Already did - Sell LINK and buy QNT. Buy low, sell high. Follow those directions and it will be of value to you. CoinMarketCap isnt ranked by usage and adoption. The primary drivers of price are hype and speculation. As holders of tokens which have no inherit value as they merely used for utility and are not designed as vehicles of financial investment, the best use case for tokens is for simply for speculation. If you knew how it worked you wouldn’t even have created this post arguing the merits of muh decentralisation. It’s a hype game. You don’t get it, so go back to plebbit where you can wax lyrical about the merits of permission v permissioned and whatnot. I’m the sort of person who bought and profited from Binance ieos because I knew they would get pumped by CZ. You sound like the person who avoided such projects believing they are scams. Stay poor, big brain.

Its over, user, theres a new sheriff in Biz town called Sergil.

Attached: Sergil.jpg (650x400, 74K)

QUANT IS A SCAM