>I cant believe I still come here >OK >ETHCC will have Link be the designated oracle for polkadot >In April the first uses of what you call mainnet will be live; this is because some projects which absolutely need on chain crypto and real world asset >prices are confident enough to use essentially centralized feeds over chainlink given that those feeds will be from trusted data providers (lookup the nodary service from chainlink consulting group) >Those will be the nodes most in demand before payment APIs are integrated; once those are up and running smoothly linkpool will let all the neets to get ready with their neet nodes >Hence the may-aug window for "real" mainnet >But the cherry on top won't come until the end of 2019: remember how this all started. The reason anyone cares about chainlink is SWIFT, full stop.
>Why did the most powerful banking collective bankroll sergey and back link? Because they're so nice? I know you all are fucking retarded and won't get it so here it is: SWIFT is how establishment banks comply with PSD2 and, instead of getting their lunch eaten, make MORE money.
>Oh, you're an ambitious startup that needs access to our customers balances? we've mad our data fully available through the industry-standard, trusted, decentralized Chainlink network, you're free to access them there at any time. And just in time to meet the regulations of PSD2.
>What's that? You're upset that each access costs more than you have allocated for such transactions and now you can't compete? Well that's just a shame. I mean we did have LINK available for over a year at less than a dollar. Why didn't you buy then? And you're mad that we hold 30% of the supply? Why wouldn't we? Look at what a fine investment it has been, friend.
>Screencap or pasta this or whatever. You're all too fucking dumb to even understand what is above. I hope the next generation of lonely introverts feeling pol/b/fit are smarter than you idiots.
well he said he was just like us and made it, he learned how and hes smarter now, id do the same thing once in a while. just come back to the place you used to call home and shoot the shit for a little bit
how the fuck it hasn't been vindicated? the polkadot thing is true the linkpool listing service to allow neet nodes is true the nodary service is exactly what link is implementing with their 21 trusted nodes. this last one was impossible to predict, nobody ever implied this shit was going to happen outside of him.
btw there was a very old larp (more than 1 year ago!) that said in the end of 2019 there was going to be a big announcement about link. In my opinion that will obviously be swift and how they are involved in the project.
Angel Thomas
I have saved every larp but cant find this one
Levi Nelson
remember the puzzle user? it was in one of those threads.
Sebastian James
Even if a larp was a legitimate insider, how could they possibly know the time of an announcement 2 years in advance?
Owen Bennett
Literally a bunch of nonsense. On march 14th banks where supposed to have whatever their apis accessible by any fintech. Meaning anyone of you tards could make a stupid simple fintech company like an app that transfers 5 bucks to your friend or whatever and then be able to request a demo from any bank in the EU. So why haven't we heard of a single example of a bank aiming to use blockchain as their api endpoint? Because they aren't using blockchain at all. The banks are all struggling to get their end point sorted. Almost half of the banks missed the deadline. There are IT companies such as digicert that are providing specialized service to the banks, helping them integrate into psd2 and none of it has to to with blockchain at all. You think your all so smart because your autistic and socially retarded but literally 5 minutes on google would be enough for any of you to see how retarded this larp even is.
Christian Roberts
Big projects tend to set clear deadlines.
Caleb Young
By being an insider you dumb truck.
Ryan White
The Sibos 2019 event happens every year. This year it's in September. Easy to predict if there's going to be a SWIFT announcement it'll happen there
nice digits but shit rebuttal How many of the current API solutions that the Financial Institutions are currently legally obligated to have up for external testing for anyone that gets the PISP or AISP stamp by the EU have anything to do with blockchain, let alone chainlink? Would none be an accurate estimate? Now let me ask you this. How would the banks benefit(or anyone for that matter) from putting the api info requested by fintechs onto blockchain? Oh and let me remind you that the api info is confidential, private information that does not belong on a blockchain.
This is your average linkie. Can't refute any part of a nuanced criticism, resorts to memepics and busswords. You can hide data from a chainlink node operator using SGX but once it's on the blockchain it doesn't matter how it got there. It will be up for display. Jesus Christ. do any of you so called nerds know anything about this shit.
Connor King
execution on the blockchain will have a unique identifier. only the backend will know who's money went where.
Daniel Lewis
You have no idea what ChainLink is.
Adam Roberts
Jesus what made you think private data will enter the public’s blockchain in the first place.
Joseph James
It's Sergey himself.
"I can't believe I still come here" gave it away
Ryder Green
Zksnarks you idiot
Aaron Baker
Truman show nigga
Lucas Nelson
dude im pretty sure private blockchain will be used for private things, fucking retard how hard is that to udnerstand, that information will be computed in town crier/sgx and spit back out on the private chain.
Dylan Williams
the whole point of the link network is you can monetize your api feed FUCKING RETARD
Lucas Walker
I'm done with you The only benefit in putting api data from financial institutions on the blockchain before its accessed by fintechs is that when fintechs fuck up (like OP's larper alluded to) the banks can easily prove without any legal hassle that the fault is not with them. Now how exactly are you going to do that if the data is encrypted. What on earth would be the benefit of that. >You need blockchain to monetize apis. Dude... what?
Leo Bell
Dude, you're ID's wack
Gavin White
obvious swinglinker fud is obvious swing from a rope
Jaxon Sanders
some woman sued the producers of drive cause the trailer made it look like a fast paced car chase movie and not just some autist fighting jews
>Basically, banks must have a back-up plan – known as “contingency measures” – in case their open APIs don’t work. They must give TPPs an alternative way of accessing their customers’ data, allowing them to use end-users’ login credentials while indicating that they are not really the end user.
Owen Cooper
>But there is one condition under which banks can do away with these contingency measures: their open APIs must have been widely used for at least three months before the September 2019 deadline.
If any of you stupid fucking leeching niggers took 15 minutes, just 15 minutes per week to read about any of this, you would stop asking retarded questions and know what the fuck to do.
Jace King
Drive has no right to exist
Ryder Wilson
based and swiftpilled
Benjamin Miller
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic, a monkey could predict it, it's the regulation deadline.
Also don't expect banks to wait until right up to the deadline, the ones with their shit together will go live with buffer, they could very well go live soon or during the summer
Oh well. You know, fud used to be addressed on here back in the day. Now Its like trying to debate someone that's ideologically possessed. Only the brainlets will hang.
>you would stop asking retarded questions and know what the fuck to do. What do?
Jonathan Barnes
If you're actually genuine I'll answer: the whole point of having SGX enabled nodes is that writing sensitive data to chain doesn't have to be done except at the discretion of the contract producers. With SGX you can write a hash to the chain that only the two parties of the transaction can interpret: the first to show they did the work and the second as cryptographic proof that their particular computation, API execution etc was completed correctly.
This was why all the autists sperged out at the TC merger, because it unlocked all of the highest value use cases of link.
Landon Young
I've watched enough National Geographic Mumbai to know pajeet isn't being sarcastic.
Ayden Davis
He's saying buy link because SWIFT member banks option is to either provide a separate access route to the fintechs trying to kill them or just redo their transfer infrastructure with corda/link and shut them out
Adrian Gomez
What is your opinion on Eth? I already ahve 80k link, I'm thinking that's enough and want to invest in another project...I'm thinking ETH has the best longterm ROI besides Chainlink.
Austin Evans
ETH has more paths to success than link but less room to grow I'd equate it to buying the crypto equivalent of an index fund with all the additional variance and upside of crypto
Dominic Ross
Hmm...very good point. What other project do you like besides chainlink? In terms of long term ROI, meaning I'm willing to hold for 3-5 years...maybe more.
Aiden Russell
I generally look for stuff with non-overlapping use cases XMR as fungible non-confiscation value asset ETH as a distributed execution layer XLM as interbank and international payments rail LINK for obvious reasons
Julian Parker
Very logical choices, assuming one is done accumulating chainlink, what other project would you invest in?
how about you shill yourself you fucking lazy piece of shit. >polkadot.network/
Cameron Adams
He just said fucktard, people like you are why anons with an IQ > 105 stopped coming to this shithole
William Cook
I was asking which one of the 3 other projects he would choose, no need to be feisty.
Jacob Rodriguez
I'm a solid value investor and a shitty market timer- if forced I'd buy XMR because it typically does well when BTC does well and is trading at historically lower BTC ratios. I also get the feeling that people haven't "got" XMR yet but that an inciting incident that will force them to (eg investor buys 1000 btc, turns out they were recently a part of a dirty transaction and now has to sell his "hot" BTC at a significant haircut).
Either that or the real use case of XMR starts getting underway; once the people of some shitty third world despot country start firing their government by moving their assets to XMR and crossing borders, it's over.
Owen Edwards
The thing about XMR though, is it's one of the few cryptos that are actually in use...which is why I think it's a terrible investment since it won't moon as hard. Also I was under the impression that nobody really holds funds in XMR, but rather uses XMR to wash funds then parks the clean funds in btc since btc is the most secure. ALso XMR can't scale
Logan Cruz
can that hash trigger a smart contract on-chain?
Grayson Hughes
With that said, would you say an investment portfolio of ETH and LINK will be solid for long term holding?
Jaxon King
All valid concerns, although BTC moons came after its first initial use case on dnms. People currently use XMR to wash BTC...what happens when the end cash fiat gateways to BTC dry up because of chain analysis...
With respect to scaleability the trilemma is real. Only something like XLM will ever trump visa. That's fine for buying coffee in portland, not fine for fleeing maduro to chile.
Luke Green
Go back and watch the portions of devcon and the early eth meetups where the serg talks about private key management within TEEs being a key function of an oracle layer
Parker Miller
Nobody would ever fault you for this Its hard to understand emerging markets unless you've been through a few- nobody really knows what will happen and who wins up winning or losing is often pretty arbitrary That said most of the big players that survive the inital cleanses don't die. There's always a chance link or eth is myspace, but more likely link/eth are early microsoft, oracle, ibm, apple or alphabet
Thomas Torres
Imagine being such a smoothbrain that you believe actual sensitive data is going “on the blockchain”. Jfc kys.
Henry Bennett
$1000 EOY faggots
Lincoln Lee
>they fell for the link is a meme meme >they fell for the $1000 is a meme meme
i have literally one friend and the rest are anons
Angel Hernandez
I have no idea what to think from here forward. Everything with respect to important partners still hasn't been announced. there is a time coming in the future where it will be essentially impossible for that information to not become public. Really the hard end of that is widespread use of the network.
I guess the only think I believe anymore is that chainlink answers to people other than retail investors. They really don't give a fuck about us. I would guess we get to know when they decide or when they just can't hide it anymore.
Matthew Hernandez
Holy fuck. I have 600 link and .5 BTC. What do frens
Hudson Davis
Have sex.
Zachary Sanchez
Your truley an idiot.
Writing the answer to a problem on the ethereum blockchain is not the same as making public the variables that got you the answer.
You sir are a moron.
Andrew Nguyen
Wait, are you saying that there will be major useage in the next couple months?
Isaiah Morris
Don't forget this is a premium service >Chainlink the new marketplace
It's exhausting constantly seeing people tout Chainlink as a solution for everything. Chainlink won't be used for PSD2 compliance, there is no evidence suggesting it will be. I'm still waiting for anyone to post evidence of there being vulnerability in any oracles.
Leo Lee
Wont have anything to do with PSD2 compliance, will just be ahead of the game for any fintech companies who want to do digital only banks utilising smart contracts
No vulnerabilities, but look at the outages oraclize have had. Also, look deeper at the working groups on the legal side of smart contracts, they are building standards for the legality of trustless digital agreements, with one component of that being "tamper proof". Without decentralized oracles, the end to end workflow will never be trustless, so this will likely work its way into those standards.
Xavier Peterson
The price makes me wish I took my 10k in profits at 1.20 and left
That could of really helped me with my situation. Guess i’m Going down with the ship, unless we make it to our destination
Gavin Morgan
>this last one was impossible to predict, nobody ever implied this shit was going to happen outside of him.
Lol you guys are stupid af, sergey himself said that link would go live without reputation or stacking and only a few nodes throwing data, we didn't believed that because we wanted SWIFT
Jack Russell
Its all jappening lads. And whereas LINK has already touch and retraced from its ATH's, king Shitcoin hasnt even made equal 20K ATH yet, nor has it retraced 50% on this recent rally.
>their open APIs must have been widely used for at least three months before the September 2019 deadline. I'm curious about this. What is the standard for "widely used"?
Jackson Harris
Will a marketplace of reputation providers actually work? What if the reputation providers started forming cartels? Regulatory capture.
Jack Cox
>How did he know? He DYORed, it's literally all public information plus a little sperging from the autists here, nothing new or fancy. He's right when he calls you dumb fucks tho
Grayson Adams
Swift in due time.
Easton Baker
There are no important partners.
Noah Murphy
youre wasting your breath. nothing can save them from being ruined, its pointless to try to make them see how delusional they are.
Gavin Sanders
Reminder that basically the entire mainnet pump has been wiped out and we're not even done dumping yet. If you think this token isn't going the way of REQ you're delusional. Jow Forums whipped itself into a frenzy over nothing.
