Why does BSV have to exist when there's already BCH?
Even if Craig is Satoj, why should someone dump their BTC for this new coin?
Honest questions
Aaron Martinez
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
twitter.com
youtube.com
tubee.fr
chainbulletin.com
chainbulletin.com
twitter.com
Leo Wilson
Bch decided layer 2 was cool, so are protocol changes and that scaling on chain was centralization. BSV is Bitcoin, it couldn't be more obvious.
Ian Bennett
BCH forked because of layer 2.
Now they want to add it
Honestly, i think Roger is simply not really interested anymore much in the progress anymore (not speaking about overall progress) and it's the team behind that got infested, just like with BTC.
Caleb King
> Why does a coin exist that seeks to get back to the original purposes of BTC when there's a different protocol available
Gee I dunno
Christian Perry
Isn't that why BCH exists though? Roger insists BCH is Bitcoin
Isaac Flores
fucking newfags. If you were around for the bullrun in late 2017 you would have seen that sending transactions cost an arm and a leg. BTC doesn't scale and core's solution is segshit and hurr durr lightning network. Big blocks are the best way to scale and SV as the biggest blocks, and so much more.
Grayson Perry
BCH was made to fix the problems you stated. Why buy BSV and not BCH?
Jace Torres
Why are you completely ignoring the first two posts?
Wyatt Edwards
BSV is going to have 2gb blocks in a few months, which is bigger than BCH. Also the metanet, Calvin, Craig, the tulip trust, and more.
Aiden Johnson
Because BCH is a protocol fork