Should we lower blocksize to get more use on LN? Seems the onboarding process could be a little more streamlined. If blocks are smaller then people wouldn't even want to bother with transacting on chain and would move to LN faster.
Thoughts?
The Lightning Network
Luis Evans
Hunter Phillips
Yes
Zachary Diaz
No op san. Lower or higher, it will fail nonetheless.
Jason Rogers
Why? LN is great. 1sat/byte transactions that are INSTANT.
Jeremiah Russell
lets go for 100 kilobyte blocks
Ethan Jones
Tbh if you could find a reliable hub, you could theoretically give them fiat and they give you a funded channel and never really have to deal with on chain again. Just leave that to someone else. It's much slower and more expensive than LN so I don't really even see the point in using it.
Evan Hughes
20 sec is not instant. less than one sec like in bsv is instant
Isaiah Long
wow
absolute state of commies
yo fag, why not simply use xrp which is not a crypto? why trusting nodes with your crypto?
what's the difference between lightning nodes and banks?
how desperate are you fags?
Luis Baker
Instant relative to what BTC maxis are used to.
Nolan Williams
While I do support this move, but the thing about LN is its not legally compliant due to its money transferring method. Read Craig Wright's new blog post about this. Not shilling but what he said in the blog sounds true in real world. Most of crypto are literally taking advantage of tranferring digits here and there, but misses the "money" concept.