Real talk on LINK price

Ok so, the market cap is about 380 mill right now , if you take into consideration their total supply it is around 1 bill.

What will the price of link be in the short, medium and long term if microsoft , salesforce, swift , jp morgan etc all come out and confirm they are using link.

X10?
X100?
X300?

I don’t want to buy eth or btc because the max they can do is x30-40, so discuss honestly, how long would it take for link to be 100$ or more and what is needed = 100 b mcap

Attached: E6E6A462-3521-419F-AFBF-2AC7C89F6FE8.jpg (1242x249, 30K)

1k EOY why this shit again?

Nobody can accurately predict prices, if they could, they would be billionaires. LINK has a lot of risk, but it also has massive potential rewards. How long will that take? Nobody can say for sure. Buy a ticket and wait, or miss the flight.

Attached: 1034 - fzYs0YV.jpg (1536x2048, 167K)

Let's say link is $1 to make it easy. If it does a modest 10x this year thats $10, then bitcoin goes to 20k. Should put link around $40. Then Bitcoin follows all previous trends and does a 20x from previous all time high. That puts link at $800. Now you can see that's modest calculations it won't take much more to get $1000 by eoy

Link is only pumping because Twitter normies are pushing a bullshit rumor. Lol

Looking at this picture and comparing it to qnt is making me feel really good about my move today

arguably that's what happened with btc and look what happened. one source says "it's gonna PUMP" everyone buys and holds and drives up the price. doesn't matter if it was actually going to pump or not. same reason why when one source says it's gonna dump normies cash out and it dumps. link only needs the right conditions (partnership announcements and positive speculation from blogs) and it will moon

this thread again holy shit he never stops

Yes, but if btc moons to 20 k while link is 10$, link will probably stay at 10$ , no?
Sats will bleed

What is moon according to you? X10? X100? I need a x100 in 3 years, how plausible do you think that is?

Link will only sustainably pump when btc/eth pump. It kind of hit a perfect storm the last month when btc was pumping hard and the announce mainnet. that made it go up a dollar.

Link is a HEAVILY manipulated crypto and yes I know most cryptos are, but it's easy to follow the patterns and see people are manipulating it up and down for their own gain

Attached: 1541461165536.jpg (1200x1200, 282K)

ChainLink will touch every market and nearly every transaction in the future. That's trillions of dollars. There's only 1 Billion tokens.

It does not matter what the price of other coins is.

Yes but it seems clear the pattern is having a lower low everytime it gets manipulated up, so obviously this trend will continue.

Yes, but what will link’s price be with this

digits : checked
milkers : checked

Link will double in price every six months

For how long?

>I don’t want to buy BTC because the max it can do is x30-40

Lmao enjoy buying your worthless meme tokens

Forever! Now tell me, when are you selling?

to me i'd probably say mooning is x50 to x100. if you're willing to hold for three years it looks to me like any established token that has a solution to a problem would perform well. back in 2012 if someone said btc would ath at ~$18k most people would probably laugh at you. find a project you believe in, dca in over time, and hopefully that investment pays off. i feel like 3 years down the line 1k link isn't absurd. eoy like people meme seems very unlikely to me but weirder things have happened.
i'm not an expert by any means but my alt holds are link, ftm, and hot. one is pumping hard right now but i'm afraid i missed the entry on that one. ftm and hot are still very cheap and have a shot at hitting $1 in the coming months/year probably which would be a x100 roughly for ftm and x500 for hot

1,000,000,000,000 ÷ 1,000,000,000 = 1,000 minimum.

Yes but will it go higher than 1000? I need 3 million minimum to make it.

Sold everything on this last spike, like everyone here should have aswell

why

This is an example of the amount of transactions Visa does per second. Node operators are paid with LINK tokens and go down to 18 decimal places. If you're able to hold long enough, the sky is the limit.

Attached: Screenshot_20190529-153024_Chrome.jpg (1439x2074, 768K)

Attached: Screenshot_20190524-045030_Drive.jpg (2791x1108, 911K)

Is 8.5k link enough to make it

If LINK is the nascent industry standard for banking APIs, the theoretical upper bound for the token is in the low six digits, user. These tokens have to back a bond market measured in the trillions annually, to say nothing of a derivatives market. If the token is displacing 5 bond lawyers, even at 100k a token that's an 80% reduction in cost for the firms involved.

If you hold and only sell a very small amount to pay off debt and expenses. It's not too late to buy more though.

>tfw you die at an old age and your kids inherit a single link which is enough to make them wealthy for the rest of their lives
damn...

Attached: on-the-nose-slider3.png (262x341, 117K)

I will hold longer than anyone in this thread

Attached: 2BE8618A-1752-49BA-8426-9876A73A06DA.gif (424x322, 63K)

I'm a swing trader, I look at the risk to reward potential and make my decision from there

link is over

Attached: Unknown.jpg (211x239, 7K)

the only swinging swinglinkers will do is from a rope

How many link will be locked up in nodes realistically, how many lockup will each node require

>boomer probably bought that car after working for the summer as a cashier.

i think almost everything will be locked up except for the reserve sergey holds to pay out operators. as time goes on the amount paid out will attenuate like bitcoin mining rewards, causing dollar value to increase correspondingly. We will never reach the point where the reservoir of link that sergey pays out for operations is exhausted, because scarcity of that pool will drive up price causing smaller and smaller fractions of link to be paid out. For a while i was worried that this would just enter into the standard spiral of consolidation and monopolization by meganodes, but then remembered that would defeat the purpose of decentralization and thereby dump the price of the links these nodes held. All node operators will have a stake not only in their own node, but in the health and decentralization of the network as a whole. It's fucking crazy but a free link token on an exchange is going to scarce as fuck.

jesus christ you guys never fail to amaze me with your delusion. you should be medicated.

imagine dumping 2/3s of the supply into the market, holy kek!

Doesn't that also mean they will be difficult to sell with incredibly low volume?

Not to the people who know what they're buying.

not at all. whether something will sell quickly is determined by the demand for it. if its scarce that just means the price will be that much higher.

Microsoft has like 10000+ software developers, why would they ever use something 2 guys build in 2 years? Why not just steal the idea and get 20 guys to build it in 2 months? I don't think Linkies understand business.

What if Sergey gets kidnapped and tortured?

Attached: Sergey-Nazarov.jpg (751x712, 68K)

it's almost certainly going to be held in a trust which, drumroll, will be fully automated trustless and tamper proof via smartcontracts

the whole package

Thats not how software development works, you cant just throw 10 times more developers at it and expect to get it done in 1/10 the amount of time

user, consider that the train has left, and all you can do is loudly slam the door in farewell.

I know that Mememagic is real ..... Link is a meme.
So i will get a couple hundred of this.

I'm actually a software developer myself, and since Link's code is open source, I can guarantee an MS team of 20 can easily rewrite all of Link's code in 2 months. I know exactly how software development works brainlet. Keep coping, no big company will ever use LINK, they will build their own.

They are building their own. They called it chainlink.

Imagine being this naive.

I would bet that every single day at MS, there's more line of codes written than 10x the entire codebase of Link. To even consider for a second that MS will use Link over building its own, is room temperature IQ. Did MS use AWS or build its own? Did MS use Google or built its own? Linkies cope is fucking hilarious.

>I'm actually a software developer myself

Highly believable, since you're a credulous idiot when it comes to non-tech stuff.

cope cope cope cope, almost all of tech executives were programmers. Why don't you refute the facts instead of personal attacks? Link going to 0, proven by the stupidity of Linkies like yourself.

>why doesn't microsoft just steal an idea thats been copyrighted
>you calling other people stupid

Attached: small brian.jpg (645x729, 34K)

kek you can't copyright software, there's always another way to do it that bypasses the patents/to defend it in court. Again your stupidity and ignorance of software dev and the industry proves Link is going to 0.

>still trading around 1$
>barely above ico price
>Jow Forums talks about x300
never change..

ico price was literally .11

there's no talking sense to the LINK holder. They really think some fat fuck Russian philosopher has invented something the lowliest developer on the Microsoft totem pole couldn't replicate within a month.

Why would Microsoft develop a decentralized oracle network instead of contributing to one? The point is that no one owns it and that it is a decentralized, trustless system. Would you want two different internets? Do you understand the concept behind any of this?

> tells people to refute his 'facts' when he casually presents a 0 proof unoriginal coder larp along with demented ramblings based on a hypothetical situation

Ad hominem is the only real thing we can go with because the only thing you have truly presented is your incredibly smooth brain. It's all just noise. The barking and pissing of a confused swinglinker. Go drink some drain cleaner and lie down in a landfill somewhere, you mouthbreathing nigger.

If they could, they would...it is very lucrative

Top kek, he didnt re enter...

>if bitcoin reaches 5B link will be 1K
>see how easy that is bros? haha we're all gonna make it amirite
kys retard

shit tier fud up your game swingie

You don't need to prove logic, it proves itself
If LINK goes to 1000, Sergey will be a trillionnaire. That's why. MS wants that trillion, it doesn't want Sergey to have it. KEK YOU ARE SO DUMB, everyone of your "argument" makes no sense and gets BTFO. Link 0eoy

Not so fast, pal.

I can’t even trade my link it’s all in cold storage. I intend to sell 10% of my stack at $100 USD, and neet off that for two years and see where my make it stack ends up.

I intend to only ever fraction split, I will leave LINK to my children as inheritance.

have sex

It might go to zero, but that doesn’t matter. Right now cryptocurrency is a lucrative bet because a lot of people believe in them. I’ve thought ChainLink (and smart contracts in general) are retard tier BS, but I’ve made a lot of money off them. No one is gonna out of nowhere say “ok, time to admit it’s all a scam.”

did sergey present today? anything interesting?

kicking myself for not loading up more when it hit 0.85 but I'm waiting on a check to clear

> logic proves itself
> refute my facts because dude trust me
> still provides 0 facts
Why do you keep providing me with evidence of your extra chromosomes instead of addressing what I pointed out about your shit-tier claims? You people are so completely fucked in the head that I don't know whether to feel pity or contempt.

I agree, I'm allin on real projects, like BTC and ETH. Not scams where 65% of the supply is controlled by 1 man, 0 user adoption, and not even have an actually decentralized mainnet.

all my facts are logic that prove themselves, but you seem to be too low IQ to realize that. You can't follow a simple conversation so there's really no hope of convincing you, but all the other potential buyers with brains are reading how retarded you and linkies are and selling, which is my goal.

Who said anything about $1000 per Link? And no one said Sergey owns 650M Link. Just admit you’re a fudding faggot. The 650M could be in a wallet that has very specific instructions of which the company founders are aware. You’re making a lot of stupid assumptions. If they give 300M tokens to Microsoft, then does your mind change? You need to learn to fud better. You sound like such a retarded faggot. Why wouldn’t Microsoft just create their own internet?

actually you bagholding and proving your retardedness to the public is the perfect outcome for me, I get to insult you AND make you poorer

BTC and ETH are just as much of nonsense as ChainLink. It’s all useless shit.

LOL IMAGINE BELIEVING THIS
hey you fucking mongloid, remind me what network Chainlink is "live" on?

Literally the only useful crypto is Monero and if people ever figure that out it will become illegal and difficult to obtain. I'm just here for the riches anyways.

See, again, your prove how low IQ you are.

Chainlink has always made Sergey and his associate millions. MS wants these millions. 10, 100, 1000EOY is irrelevent. But you are too stupid to read between the lines.

Wether Sergey owns 65% of the supply, or Sergey and his 10 associates, or a trust controlled by Sergey and his 10 associates, does not make a single difference. It's still 65% of the supply controlled by 1-50 people. But see, you are too stupid to understand that.

I have to spell out every detail that a normal person with normal IQ would just understand as "logic".

There’s no point in arguing with you. You’re just another stinky linky fudding his own project for whatever mental illness you have and larping as someone who hates link but just researches it in depth to point it’s flaws out in 20 posts per thread. You’re accomplishing nothing.

Pic relative you massive nigger. KYS

Attached: Screenshot_2019-03-22-15-47-54-710_com.brave.browser.png (1080x2280, 495K)

Right. Thanks for convincing us with your high IQ

kek every time a dumb linky gets BTFO he says "durr you must be an undercover linky!!!"

Your IQ is so low.

Chainlink is not decentralized. All they did was create a token out of thin air, sell 35% to randos, keep 65%.

MS can do that in 2 seconds and be just as "decentralized".

Again, another LOW IQ Linky arugment BTFO. Are you guys crying yet? On suicide watch? Bring on more "arguments", which I will also BTFO, I'm waiting.

>12 posts by this id

I'm sorry to were BTFO swing trading.
You clearly don't work in tech or so any software development, because if you did you'd realise not every company can be specialists in everything and they reach for services who are experts in their field

>Microsoft doesn't use open source, they build their own hurr durr

Brainlet faggot

I do work as a programmer, I've even done work for a few ICOs.

Oh again the whole "you must be an undercover linky" argument. Have sex

It will be decentralized. For the rest of your message, read pic related of my previous message. Nigger

Programmer in what exactly? Spill it and I'll know if you're full of shit. Nobody refers to themselves as a programmer who actually builds software.

>I've even done work for a few ICOs.
Oh wow, impressive, user
Did you do marketing for bitconnect too?

establish basic boundary conditions for market cap and pricing and index it against how much risk/exposure you're willing to take

basic breakdown for the lurkers and contributors of this thread:

>btc - 50%
>eth - 35%
>link - 15%

change the order of these 3 to suit the amount of risk you're willing to carry (risk in this context is the exposure to the crypto market, ie. money holding crypto vs. your earnings, assets and potential future earnings)

Attached: 1559129671938.png (1830x1859, 273K)

It will not be decentralized. ETH is decentralized. They spend their 16mill ICO money hiring 100 devs to finish their mainnet in 1 year, and they own less than 1% of the supply.

Sergey owns 65% of the supply and kept the 32mil to himself instead of hiring enough devs to complete the mainnet in a timely fashion. Note that current mainnet of Chainlink is not finished, it's not currently able to handle decentralization.

Yes they do, because I do and I program full time. I do mostly backend nodejs work, and I got gigs for the icos because I've worked a lot with IPFS and Web3.

Ethereum and Bitcoin were premined to oblivion. But that's not what make a network centralized. Nigger and retard

Tell me the best feature that arrived natively in node 10 LTS? You'll likely get this wrong googling and will only know the correct answer with experience

Bro, why are you so dumb? Why is it tht I can BTFO every single one of your argument in 2 second?

Eth foundation's ETH reserve were less than 1% of the supply 2 years in.

Do you know anyone who owns 65% of bitcoin? Let me know, I will dump my stack instantly.

>Missing the point
That's not what make a network centralized. Nigger

No clue, they haven't added anything I use since node 8 I think. Most of the "new" features are use are classes, destructuring, proxies, arrow function, const, let, for of. They really add so little features every version now that you'd have to be autistic as fuck to know them.

You kids will never stop shilling shitcoins, huh?

>microsoft , salesforce, swift , jp morgan etc all come out and confirm they are using link.

Dude, that's delusional. No one will actually ever use LINK for anything. Except maybe the Sergey and couple of biz neets for fun. It's the same for all these crypto projects. After 10 years bitcoin STILL has no one who actually uses it for anything except HODLing and pump&dumps. Screencap this.

Yes it does, especially since Link plans on using staking for reputation kek. Also if you think running a node mkes it decentralized, I think MS can get poeople to run more nodes than fucking chainlink kek. They have like 75% of desktop marketshare.

HOW DUMB CAN YOU BE. It never seizes to amaze me.