I am unironically 99% in LINK and have held since Oct 17. I am in the top 600 wallets. What I see when I look at Quant is the same as what I saw with Link - it is too technical for brainlets to grasp, so there will be a long drawn out phase of accumulation while everyone tries to understand the project with autistic hivemind until it finally beds itself into Jow Forums lore by which time it is already too late.
A message from a LINK OG
Ethan Smith
Jeremiah Murphy
Holy shit fuck off with your cringe shill you massive faggot
Angel Green
Fuck off thot poster.
Logan Ramirez
user... really? you honestly made this thread again?
SAGE and kys
William Young
Like I said, you faggots will too be late to realize this.
Nicholas Watson
No. Quant is a half assed approach at the problem. You don't use centralized software with decentralized backends.
Also, you have no idea how to value the token because all deals are done behind closed doors. On an open network everyone pays the going rate of gas or however they price it, but quant is jut a bunch of promises with no proof. The whole goals is to be trustless yet quant thinks it's a good idea to go trusted....
Joshua Evans
>Gook chink pic
Asher White
source on this bitch plz
Chase Morris
This post is so fake and gay that this has to be reverse FUD. Never took the time to look at QNT but I’m unironically going to now. Fuck you op I’m sure it’s a piece of shit and I’m wasting my time
Grayson Jenkins
>I am in the top 600 wallets.
tfw in the top 20 QNT wallets.
I am literally going to have tens of millions from this fucking thing, fucking hell.