blocktv.com
570 banks using QNT tokens.
Universal Utility Token info coming out
Staking coming out
Minimal wallet holding coming out
BitMax coming
Institutional investors coming
Just reversed and currently in a dip.
What the fuck are you retards waiting for? Buy QNT.
Other urls found in this thread:
finance.yahoo.com
medium.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Lol this scamming shitcoin was shilled so hard in here when it reached ATH this year. Dumped 100% immediately after.
Useless shitcoin functioning as a means for the scamming team to dump on clueless morons who thinks this ERC shitcoin has any utility.
Exists for no reason. Creating a solution to a "problem" no one needs
Quanties think they are the next TCP/IP to rule the world, yet a proprietary software that you need to pay a license fee for will never be a global international standard.
They think Chainlink can't connect blockchains together... but it can and so can so many other protocols with much more determinism, less trust, and cheaper.
The whole point in using a decentralized backend like a blockchain is to get deterministic services, yet they think using a trusted software to run all your transactions through is logical. In fact, it ruins the entire value proposition.
They think of themselves as the blockchain of all blockchains yet it's proprietary software and you need to pay a license to use. Again, it doesn't make sense to use proprietary software to leverage decentralized backends.
There is also a major problem in their tokenomics model. There is no way of actually knowing how the token is used since everything is negotiated behind closed doors. They say you have to hold it to get a license fee, but how can anyone prove it? They say you pay to sign data like transaction fee but no one can prove that either. There are no on-chain metrics to prove anything unlike all other protocols. For all we know they could be doing a freemium model with these companies to test out to see if they like it.
Then don’t get me started about Shillbert always hyping up the coin and nothing to show. There is zero transparency about what is actually going on since the whole project is not an open protocol. They should just be an STO and it would make a lot more sense.
the absolute state of Jow Forums
Enjoy Poverty. Keep chasing Chink Pump and Dumps and Ranjeet Coins.
Have a nice life.
They literally just got the only meaningful partnership in crypto.
finance.yahoo.com
Right. Got any more of that completely baseless FUD? Accumulation time is soon over, so you best try to get those orders in soon, user.
Nice pasta, faggot.
"They think of themselves as the blockchain of all blockchains"
It isn't even a blockchain, it's a blockchain OS, the first of its kind.
Opinion dismissed.
Debunk any of it, cause I know you moonbois can't
A lot of people mad they didnt buy a few days ago will be mad in a week that they didnt buy today.
>Posting baseless FUD with absolutely no substance whatsoever, proving that I don't know jack shit about the subject in question.
>Debunk me pls
You're going to look back at this and feel very, very, very stupid.
Very much so.
You keep deflecting. I laid out very clear points and you have nothing. I acknowledge that it might pump, but it's a short lived solution. You guys think it's bigger than one it is and there is some major problems with several features.
570 banks are using OverLedger while you're still struggling to use your brain.
Stay rekt.
You have no idea if they are using it. They are likely testing the network. How do you know they are required to use the token? They could just be using a freemium model for testing with the hopes that maybe they will use in the future. There is n o transparency with token usage or network usage.
If you're going to use OverLedger or mAPPS built on OverLedger, you're going to need the token. Simple as that.
They're also working on a dashboard to show the "heartbeat" of the network, tokens locked up etc.
medium.com
Read the tokenomics. I mean or don't idc but why talk about thibgs you haven't looked into?
You don't know though because all deals are negotiated behind closed doors. It's not like a normal open network where there is a standard network fee that everyone knows.
Oracle makes $40 billion per year selling proprietary enterprise software.
>> muh no one will buy proprietary software muh
As for Chainlink do you think it's going to be totally free for enterprise to use and Sergey is building it out of the kindness of his own heart? Wake up.
>> doesn't make sense to use proprietary software to leverage decentralized backends
Well clearly it does for the people who matter, i.e. those in major corporations and enterprise. You are a basement dwelling NEET on Biz who thinks it has no value proposition. Meanwhile, the directors who run the multi-billion dollar fintech company that powers a huge chunk of the global financial system think it does have a good value proposition.
Hmm I wonder who's got it right.
Again, you can say a lot of things but there is no way to verify he's not using a freemium model right now, which is probably the case to hopefully lure people in.
It's permissionless to use, so you don't need a license fee like with Quant.
Companies use proprietary software but doesn't make sense to do so with a decentralized backend. It's a security vulnerability.
You also have no proof anyone is using it. Everything is done behind the scenes. They are likely testing in a freemium model currently. Doesn't mean they will use it,
You think they're going to give licenses away for free? The licenses are paid for in fiat by the clients through the treasury, which then buys the tokens on the market.
QNT price is irrelevant for the consumer, who might not even know that they're using tokens. They just want to pay the license to reap the benefits of OverLedger.
More tokens locked up in licenses = less tokens on the market = $$$ for me.
It's clear to me that you've been spoonfed FUD by the whale group that's been manipulating QNT lately, and that you're just regurgitating it.
Imagine falling for weak ass FUD like "QUANT IS A SCAM" just like people called LINK a scam before.
There are so many similarities with the Quant and LINK situation desu. A tech that isn't easy to understand or explain that will revolutionize the whole industry, with people calling it a scam to accumulate.
Don't be one of those people, user.
Quant don't even charge tokens usage to current clients. For now it is free for anyone who wants to "explore", plus they give the companies lots of money to start using it.
It is all paid hype and partnerships. It is just Quant people pumping and dumping on them selves, along with occassional team dump of tokens.
TL DR - team dump tokens, no on Eos using tokens. Purely speculative.
Did I say it was a scam? No i never did. I said their business model is flawed, especially long term and for their token. No one has ever gone in depth with the points I brought up
That's the thing. Most of these partnerships are free exploratory relationships. Which is fine, but people are pumping them up to be way more. I don't think it's a scam but people need to stop hyping it up like it's some revolution.
>> You don't need a license fee
So? Why should enterprises care? Business is about ROI. If something saves millions of dollars and costs a lot less than it saves, that's all they care about. That's really the bottom line regardless of your theories.
Also, what happens if the enterprise wants 24/7 SLA support in this relatively new and emerging technology? Can they hold Chainlink accountable and responsible to fix any issues, like they're going to want, or will they just be told tough shit?
This is the problem with you decentralized purists. You completely misunderstand what enterprises want from DLT, and seem to think full end-to-end decentralization is the most favoured outcome. Protip: in 99% of cases, it's not.
>> You have no proof
>> Likely testing a freemium model
Nice logic user.
Nice copypasta
stinkies utterly btfo
By the time you find the answer to all your questions and doubts, it will be too late.
By the time my parents and friends gained some trust with regards to Bitcoin, it was also too late. (in the thousands of usd)
Stop fucking crying and start buying. Things will make sense gradually.
Years ago it started with the ISO TC 307
Few months ago it was Guy Dietrich of Rockefeller Capital Management joining Quant's board of directors.
Now we have SIA.eu using Quant for 570 banks.
There are airports in the talks. Many other top companies and banks. This shit takes time
What do you think BaaS is? They provide all the available protocol to make DLT solutions, but provide the SLA support to companies. Their whole value besides putting all the protocols on one interface, is to provide SLA support.
Business is about ROI and most are starting to realize that private chains and private middleware is not the solution. It's like when companies didn't want to use the clouds in the early days. Those that didn't use clouds spent tons of money on systems that they had to upgrade later. They fell behind technologically and monetarily to companies who saw the innovation of clouds. All because they didn't want to give up control.
It's not about being purists, it's about where the value proposition is. Look at alot of the current work being put out there. Companies like EY and others are seeing that the value is the decentralization and open source because having a patented blockchain or middleware gives advantage to those that own it and costs more.
I wish i could put my big toe un your butthole. Thats what im saying too basically. People obviously mad they didnt buy a few days ago will be mad they didnt buy today.
This 100%
Buy now, do your research later and realize that you're going to hold this one for the long run.
100$ for this is literally nothing.
You're welcome to join Telegram chat, there are more technically capable people there.
Post the exact same question.
Anyone can talk big hiding behind a Keyboard.
Join the Telegram chat if you have Balls, you cuk.
Okay, well Quant provides the full service and protocols to connect with up to 10 blockchains simultaneously, and handles all the token fees for those various blockchains on behalf of the enterprise, and provides full SLA support. It's a full turnkey solution to start using DLT with mass interoperability right now, and guarantees that any future blockchains and even future forks will be dealt with seamlessly. Millions of dollars in savings by leveraging DLT, all without barely having to life a finger or worry about any of the current adoption barriers.
>> muh where's the value proposition
Blows your mind to think that QNT has been unlocked for nearly a YEAR now and people are still trying to fud.
It will be the same next year when we're around the $50-100 level (or more, who knows) and people will still claim it is bullshit.
So your telling me I will move my multi million dollar contracts and private data all through your centralized proprietary software when I could do all this through an open source network that provides me guarantees? Nah I don't think so.
Companies don't trust other companies with their sensitive data and agreements. Too much uncertainty with the software. The new path forward is open source. I can get confidentality guaranteed and interoperability with open source. You just can't see it yet.
Its the same who are FUDing now that missed an easy 30x on QNT since September.
Some people are just born to stay poor and complain and hate.
Hey there Big Man, why don't you join the Quant Telegram group and copy/paste the exact same question?
Anyone can talk big hiding behind a Keyboard.
Join the Telegram chat if you have Balls, you cuk.
>through an open source network
> he thinks that multinational companies are all using open source software to run their billion dollar businesses
Join the official Telegram and post your shit there, get BTFO and see the light.
For your own good, user.
Hey guy we need to update our banks backend infrastructure which looks after millions of customers details and billions worth of assets. We got 50 million budget. Can you help?
You: no problem, let me have a look at github
KEK
This interview just came out, should be interesting.
Big corporations will go with trusted parties through networking done by people like Shillbert who has tea with people in hig places (literally), and just secured what almost could be called the first real world deal in crypto, and you LINKtards are wanking over breadcrumbs and literal LARPS. This is the wi dow to switch to a team that delivers, with a CEO who is a networking BOSS, not a philosophy major autismo.
Turn your story into a redemption arc, sell link buy qnt.
SETTLING PAYMENTS FOR ITALIAN CENTRAL BANK WTFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
There are people who actually think like this
>> Companies don't trust other companies with their sensitive data and agreements
Holy shit really? Wow enterprises best get their money out of all those banks and stop using all those Oracle, Microsoft, VMware and CDW proprietary platforms then.
You might only trust open source networks for multi million dollar contracts and private data, but if you've noticed, you don't have multi million dollar contracts and private data. And those who do have such things (i.e. Sia) are clearly interested in this, among others.
You can debate this until you're blue in the face, but the underlying fact remains true: Those that actually matter - who have the multi-billion dollar companies and have had numerous technical meetings with Quant - know what they know and have ended up disagreeing with you.
CENTRAL BANK SETTLEMENTS for the ITALIAN CENTRAL BANK. OMG.
$100, here we come.
>$100, here we come
QNT will be valued in the $1000s at a minimum, likely $10s of $1000s, even if it performs much worse than XRP and the next bullrun is not as big.
“So what we’ve done is instead of just announcing one client and one thing, we’re announcing that we’re working with SIA. So, SIA is leading European payment infrastructure. And what we’re doing with SIA is interconnecting blockchain networks with SIA, and doing settlements, which are central bank settlements, with the central bank in Italy. So what Overledger is doing is we’re actually bringing blockchain and interoperability to all of SIA’s clients, which are 580 banks. So, Overledger could be rolled out to all these institutions, financial services, banks, at scale, and have interoperability to get the benefits of this.”