“So what we’ve done is instead of just announcing one client and one thing, we’re announcing that we’re working with SIA. So, SIA is leading European payment infrastructure. And what we’re doing with SIA is interconnecting blockchain networks with SIA, and doing settlements, which are central bank settlements, with the central bank in Italy. So what Overledger is doing is we’re actually bringing blockchain and interoperability to all of SIA’s clients, which are 580 banks. So, Overledger could be rolled out to all these institutions, financial services, banks, at scale, and have interoperability to get the benefits of this.”
>PROJECT SPUNTA
Watch the interview from Money 20/20, just released (start at about 3 minutes):
Dear ChainLink holders. I was once one of you, believing in the 1000$ meme.
I'm telling you, this is it. This is the REAL 1000$ EOY meme coming through right before your eyes. Face it, you missed BTC, you missed ETH, don't fucking miss QNT.
It's basically only available on IDEX now so brainlets can't buy it, but when this shit hits better exchanges (probably already next week) there will be fucking fireworks.
LINK has mooned already, this is only at 30M mCap.
If you're not convinced at this point, this message/thread is not for you.
Oliver Barnes
"Some shitcoin". STAY REKT FUCKING FAGGOT we're going to 1000$.
Landon Rodriguez
>only available on IDEX translation >its an ERC-20 token.
Cooper Cruz
>not gnoing what the blockchain observatory forum is >not gnoing INATBA
Oliver Torres
I have 30k QNT
I'm going to be a multi millionaire aren't I?
Andrew Howard
Quanties think they are the next TCP/IP to rule the world, yet a proprietary software that you need to pay a license fee for will never be a global international standard.
They think Chainlink can't connect blockchains together... but it can and so can so many other protocols with much more determinism, less trust, and cheaper.
The whole point in using a decentralized backend like a blockchain is to get deterministic services, yet they think using a trusted software to run all your transactions through is logical. In fact, it ruins the entire value proposition.
They think of themselves as the blockchain of all blockchains yet it's proprietary software and you need to pay a license to use. Again, it doesn't make sense to use proprietary software to leverage decentralized backends.
There is also a major problem in their tokenomics model. There is no way of actually knowing how the token is used since everything is negotiated behind closed doors. They say you have to hold it to get a license fee, but how can anyone prove it? They say you pay to sign data like transaction fee but no one can prove that either. There are no on-chain metrics to prove anything unlike all other protocols. For all we know they could be doing a freemium model with these companies to test out to see if they like it.
Then don’t get me started about Shillbert always hyping up the coin and nothing to show. There is zero transparency about what is actually going on since the whole project is not an open protocol. They should just be an STO and it would make a lot more sense.
