Gil has said he want's to engage in a different way with community. ie fuck you lot i liked your ico millions now i cant be fucked with you. Reaction from community was we fucking love you. Has there ever been a more cucked community in crypto?
Also he says he overdelivered when the UK and US banks he promised on record never happened. Instead just some exploratory thing with SIA which means almost nothing.
He fucked us...i knew he would. Hes a slimy British politician type. Saw his type a mile away.
Dude there are like 3000 shitcoins , we have no idea who you are talking about. I know your little Kool aid club is important to you but none of us non cult member give a shit about literal whos.
He does bi-weekly AMAs and they regularly post updates elsewhere on a personal and business level. I'm pretty happy about that.
>> Says he overdelivered
He did. They have a partnership with the core of the European financial system. No other project comes close.
>> exploratory thing with SIA which means almost nothing.
GG completely making things up based on huge assumptions that directly contradict all official sources.
Nice cope user.
Robert Stewart
dahell is wrong with you user. This man will literally make you a millionaire within 3 years
Aiden Green
I actually like seeing posts like this as it makes me realize how under the radar Quant still is despite all of its achievements.
Plenty of room to moon.
Ayden Sanders
Quant either uses chainlink, or is unusable
Chase Collins
Wrong sir. Quant has its own patented tech.
Tyler Mitchell
QUANT IS A SCAM. RSR uses chainlink
Michael Morgan
this but unironically amazing to see the other bagholder itt trying to spin this reply as "good news because it's so under the radar", lmao you fags buy pnd's that already went x100 in 2017, and you're surprised when they crash and burn
Lucas Barnes
They will develop another chainlink in addition to what they initially promised? Seems legit
Easton Reyes
They have a partnership the same way vechain did with bmw. “Investigating” the tech doesn’t mean shit. >nobody else is close You think you’ve missed out on LINK but it hasn’t even begun. Drop your shitcoin or become irrelevant.
Ian Carter
imagine banks using XRP to move their money? i see why people are buying into this useless scam kek
> In 2018, SIA managed 14 billion institutional services transactions, 7.2 billion card transactions, 3 billion payments, 51.7 billion financial transactions and carried 1,204 terabytes of data on the network.
Cope harder.
Josiah Hughes
When will these moon boys learn Gilbert and the team doesnt give a shit about the token price. They are trying to run a legit business. The token was just an excuse to raise millions of dollars from ico.
Cooper Perez
When will Biz autists learn that Quant has 4 million QNT, and if they make QNT a requirement for licensing and usage, but still offer a fiat gateway with the Quant Treasury where Quant can handle QNT acquisition and storage on the client's behalf, then they can make constant fiat revenue while also making their QNT holdings worth hundreds of millions of dollars as well.
John Gomez
QNT holders are the most deluted bunch of people on this board. No legit financial company will want to hold a volatile token for business.
It doesn't make financial sense, it doesn't make accounting sense. Just doesn't make sense at all. Imagine telling your oversight authority that you have somewhere between 1 and 100 million exposure to a fucking token, where a start up company or some crypto whale can dump their bag and mess with your risk calculation. Oh and by the way, 100K belongs to some indian scammer now.
It doesn't need to be on a blockchain either, absolute garbage.
Christian Phillips
Ahh, another brainlet rolls along who doesn't understand and/or hasn't bothered to read. I literally said it in the post above.
Quant has the Quant Treasury. Either clients can pay in QNT directly, or they can pay fiat to the Quant Treasury which will handle the acquisition, custodianship and payments of QNT on the client's behalf.
Voila. QNT is required for licensing and usage, but in a way that financial companies don't have to personally touch a single QNT token themselves if they don't want to.
Also, the Overledger system, with it allowing multi-chain apps, will also automatically handle the individual token custodianship and spending of the native blockchains' tokens for gas fees etc. This means enterprise can have a system using 10 blockchains simultaneously, and despite using Overledger, and despite their data transfers requiring the expenditure of 10 different native tokens for gas fees in a complicated web, enterprises still don't even have to touch crypto unless they wish to.
Get it now? Quant has removed all the barriers to multi-chain enterprise adoption in one swoop.
Josiah Kelly
Yeah because gay Gil said so. With some muh magic tricks suddenly blockchains can talk to each other and achieve something top cryptographers and programmers have been working for years.
and THEY WANT YOU TO GET A PIECE OF THAT
Funny how they can only fool pizza people and brainlet like you
Hunter Watson
And seemingly also fool Sia, which powers the network for the European financial system, and also Crowdz, which just received $5m in direct funding from Barclays. And Gartner too, which recently named Quant a 2019 Cool Vendor (alongside Chainlink and BAT from previous years).
Funny how all these successful institutions and businesses are all interested in Quant and have made moves while some basement dwelling incels on Biz remain skeptical.
HMMMM not sure who I should side with on this one.
Jackson Martin
>Sia, which powers the network for the European financial system Lmao did you bump your fucking head?
Josiah Rivera
Let me guess. You think I'm talking about Siacoin, right?
It's Sia Group, user. And they do indeed run Sianet, which is the low-latency private network for financial settlements that powers transactions between 570 banks and financial institutions, including numerous European central banks. It's all out there on the web if you do 30 seconds of research.
Honestly this thread categorically proves how monumentally stupid most people on Biz are.
Logan Gomez
>Gartner too, which recently named Quant a 2019 Cool Vendor (alongside Chainlink and BAT from previous years).
Gartner 'Cool Vendor' doesn't mean SHIT you absolute pleb.
Josiah Parker
> Ignores the rest of the post regarding Sia and Crowdz
> Muh the Gartner analysis means nothing
The absolute rock bottom state of Biz.
I've noticed a recurring pattern where all the most stupid sounding people who don't do any research also happen to not own any Quant. What a coincidence.
Christopher Hughes
Let me guess, you invested in a used car salesman selling useless tokens based on "secret nda partnerships" with the biggest companies in the world?
Sebastian Lewis
Pffffft ahahaha
Jack Butler
>> Muh the Gartner analysis means nothing
>3100 '''Cool Vendors''' since 2004 >Thinking this is in anyway exclusive >Correlating LINK and Brave's mcap with Gartner
Correlation is not causation you fucking mouthbreather
They posted about the partnership on their own website you grade-A autist.
Just stop. You're embarrassing yourself.
Christian Adams
Quanties think they are the next TCP/IP to rule the world, yet a proprietary software that you need to pay a license fee for will never be a global international standard.
They think Chainlink can't connect blockchains together... but it can and so can so many other protocols with much more determinism, less trust, and cheaper.
The whole point in using a decentralized backend like a blockchain is to get deterministic services, yet they think using a trusted software to run all your transactions through is logical. In fact, it ruins the entire value proposition.
They think of themselves as the blockchain of all blockchains yet it's proprietary software and you need to pay a license to use. Again, it doesn't make sense to use proprietary software to leverage decentralized backends.
There is also a major problem in their tokenomics model. There is no way of actually knowing how the token is used since everything is negotiated behind closed doors. They say you have to hold it to get a license fee, but how can anyone prove it? They say you pay to sign data like transaction fee but no one can prove that either. There are no on-chain metrics to prove anything unlike all other protocols. For all we know they could be doing a freemium model with these companies to test out to see if they like it.
Then don’t get me started about Shillbert always hyping up the coin and nothing to show. There is zero transparency about what is actually going on since the whole project is not an open protocol. They should just be an STO and it would make alot more sense.
Hunter Williams
>Crowdz
Literally who tier Silicon Valley startup with a Wordpress template website with stock images instead of team photos.
