QUANT IS NOT A SCAM
TOP 5 EOY CONFIRMED
QUANT (QNT)
Kayden Williams
Other urls found in this thread:
sia.eu
quant.network
micky.com.au
twitter.com
Jonathan Morris
... if they use chainlink
Camden Murphy
...
James Jones
Your not wrong!!
Isaac Kelly
hallelujah!
Brandon Thomas
This is the correct thread
This is the ethrum killer of the 2019 market caps certainly
Do you think this sleeping giant has not been working hard? Well guess what, it has? Get in or stay poor - or as they all say:
You know what you want! just buy some Quant!
John Ward
Today I bought a new ledger and 500 QNT for my wife's son's college fund. I hope my wife will reward me by removing my chastity tonight. I shit you not, being locked up in a week is way harder than months holding QNT from ATH till now. Oh, I also plan to ask my wife's boyfriend to let me see and use my private key to sell some FTM and LTO to buy more QNT (I want to be all in) or to withdraw it to pay some bills. Of course I have to discuss it first with my wife and get her approval while I lick her cum-filled pussy like usual in our bedroom. Wish me luck guys.
Nolan Thompson
They got scammed by people impersonating Bitmax. You must be dumb to invest in these brainlets that got fucking scammed
Cameron Ramirez
Even more of a brainlet not investing in the internet 4.0 just because of one human error.
Aaron Jenkins
Quanties think they're the next TCP/IP to rule the world, yet a proprietary software that you need to pay a license fee for will never be a global international standard.
They think Chainlink can't connect blockchains together.. but it can and so can so many other protocols with much more determinism, less trust, and cheaper.
The whole point in using a decentralized backend like a blockchain is to get deterministic services, yet they think using a trusted software to run all your transactions through is logical. In fact, it ruins the entire value proposition.
They think of themselves as the connector of all blockchains yet it's proprietary software and you need to pay a license to use. Again, it doesn't make sense to use proprietary software to leverage decentralized backends.
There is also a major problem in their tokenomics model. There is no way of actually knowing how the token is used since everything is negotiated behind closed doors. They say you have to hold it to get a license fee, but how can anyone prove it? They say you pay to sign data like transaction fee but no one can prove that either. There are no on-chain metrics to prove anything unlike all other protocols. Essentially, they have central control over the pricing of the entire protocol. For all we know they could be doing a freemium model with these companies to test out to see if they like it. Also, with it being proprietary, how do we know that there are no backdoors built in? Quant is simply not compatible with deterministic systems.
Then don’t get me started about Shillbert always hyping up the coin and nothing to show. If Quant is so big, why is he shilling all the time to neets? Look at Chainlink and then look at smug Gil taking pictures in his “fancy” meetings. All these partnerships are exploratory, yet the community thinks billions are flowing through the network. There is zero transparency about what's actually going on since it's proprietary. They should be an STO.