Attached: Screenshot_20190613-134550.jpg (1078x1222, 198K)
Poor fag here. Is 500 Link enough?
Dominic Bailey
Evan Baker
Enough for a large house, maybe.
Connor Young
>Choosing Quant over LINK
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA YOU DESERVE TO NOT MAKE IT
Ayden Johnson
You’ll only make it if you live in a fourth world country
Nolan Long
Qant has helped me a lot but maybe its time to give in and bens the knee
Jordan Evans
Look, i'll throw you a bone.
Understand this.
Quant will never reach the heights Chainlink will.
Either you bend the knee or you buy kneepads.
Nathaniel Evans
Yeah but if it gets half way itll be worth a shit ton
Wyatt Carter
It will not. Three relevant projects. Btc for liquidity, eth for smart contracts, link for oracle. The rest goes to 0
Charles James
Stay strong, Quant and Chainlink are brothers.
Brandon Reyes
And Chainlink will never give the kind of ROI Quant can currently give based on existing MCs.
x10 Chainlink = $6.4 billion
x10 Quant = $440 million
And bear in mind that no project has grown up to a multi-billion cap since the golden bull run.
I like Chainlink but there's no denying that Quant has a far greater and more realistic upside. In fact Linkies should be looking at taking profits now as it'll be a huge ask to reach $1.3 billion which is only a x2 from here.
Don't fall in love with projects. Learn to let go when the time is right.
Jaxon Garcia
Woah based this is my exact portfolio almost
Brayden Garcia
>Chainlink
>x10
Honestly you deserve to lose money fucking dumb Quantcuck. Stay sucking on Gilberts balls stupid nigger.
Austin Fisher
Nice rage cope.
Like I said, I like Chainlink and I've been in it since it was first launched, but the math doesn't lie.
Luke Russell
$1000 EOY isn't a meme. Enjoy bag-holding Quant to zero because LINK makes it redundant.
Chase Robinson
So you think Chainlink is going to be worth $350 billion? And potentially near $1 trillion once LINK allocated for node incentivization is eventually distributed?
Okay buddy. Also, Chainlink doesn't make it redundant. They have different models with different USPs. In fact Chainlink and Quant could co-exist quite peacefully.
Isaac Allen
Maybe. Load up on some free ethplode while youre waiting for link to moon. Their telegram: t.me/ETHplodeBot?start=549226050
Blake Smith
Thats $500m
Noah Russell
Just go all in on Quant, eth and link are already bloated quant would need to 20x almost to reach links market cap....a 20x for Link would be 14 billion
Now user which one seems more likely
Ethan King
You really deserve to be poor, faggot
William White
B-B-BUT THE TOKENOMICS REEEEEEE3EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Michael Long
500k isn’t bad
Jason Morales
This. 1000$ EOY isn't even a meme for Quant, considering who's using OverLedger. Top 5 project.
Linkies would be wise taking profits into QNT now.
Landon Roberts
I also think LINKies should sell and buy quant. Sell your LINK. This growth is unsustainable. Quant is way better than LINK, it's, like, a brother. Quant will be as successful as link because they are brothers. And you LINKies need to sell because the brother needs some love because, you know, since they're brothers they'll have the same success just look at the winkelvoss twins, they're brothers. I don't know much about genetics but I can tell you quant and LINK are brothers. But one thing I do know is that you LINKies need to SELL.
Lincoln Rodriguez
Agree, Chainlink will never give the kind of ROI Quant can currently give based on existing MCs.
x10 Chainlink = $6.4 billion
x10 Quant = $440 million
Which is more easier to pull off?
Let your COMMON SENSE decide.
Camden Garcia
what app is this?
Luke Johnson
Blockfolio, but use Delta.
Andrew Parker
500 LINK isn't but 500 QNT is
Cooper Fisher
Truth