Cute "pump" you got there linkies

Headlines will read "CSW owes the xxx Billion Satoshi coins to Some Guy."

Market will react confused, but conclusion will be: "I guess in conjunction with Copyright events he must be Satoj. He just got buttraped, maybe he'll be extra motivated to make this BSV thing work?"

Script reactivation basically means everything good about Ethereum will be built on BSV. It's going to take time, but someone will build it.

Also the only viable way to actually make a public blockchain (aka "Bitcoin") work is by scaling it on-chain. Literally every other coin on the market is doing it wrong.

It's retarded obviously. bsv is pump and dump by a bunch of faggots. Google and chainlink is all that matters. Jow Forums is a stinky linky board.

Good luck with those centralized scammy bags pajeet :DD

Attached: cuck.jpg (1440x1740, 237K)

WARNING
Pajeets operate in this area. They will try to prise those precious linkies from biz telling you to get BSV instead

But BCH has already beaten them to the punch. Top Etherum developers and toolset are already developed. I actually sold a portion of my Eth on the news....long term (>5 yrs) its hard to see a continued value prop for eth. BSV will be zero by then because CSW will be: (a) arrested, (b) on the lam, (c) dead (pick one)

Keyword “might”
Fuck off jeet

32mb is not enough. BCH's lead dev thinks the maximum capacity being filled is enough to achieve, I believe, Paypal levels of transactions (It may have been another payment service provider). This is lunacy and constant full 32mb blocks are not how money works. There is no room for Christmas shopping and other events. It is central planning and it will fail.

OP_datasigverify has made BCH illegal. The only reason why authorities have not acted yet, is because BCH is not big enough yet. The same holds true for Schnorr signatures. It's a dead man walking, due to privacy reasons. Neither authorities nor big businesses will accept this.

A similar fate is true for BTC and LN. It is already being investigated by Interpol as we speak. People don't realize these things are just ticking money-bombs.

BCH'ers never have a comeback for this, except for "muh Anarchy." It is doomed.

you should check thecaseforbsv.com... looks pretty compelling to me to get rid of all shitcoins and buy solely into BSV

thecaseforbsv.com as well for you. it popped up a couple of days here on Jow Forums. if you haven't read it you definitely should.

No thanks. their lead guy is basically a criminal

You can tell how shit bsv is because the shill posts are shit reddit tier style write ups, we'll besides the pajeets that can't words that well..
Notice how bch isn't really shill ed at all on biz...
Think about it anons.. bch is most practical if u really think about it..bsv is just a pile of shit. It's big held afloat by cregs govt handlers with the hedge funds, it's the govt hail Mary. They think they so smert lol. Eat shit bsv bag holders , u should be fucking ashamed of yourselfs. Remember what the meaning of crypto is kids.

Attached: 1536632776902.png (456x450, 48K)

>lead guy is basically a criminal
which one ?

Attached: wait a minute that bitcoin.png (1280x720, 877K)

literally all of them

meaning of crypto is peer to peer electronic cash

>a fucking felon

>OP_datasigverify has made BCH illegal
>Script reactivation basically means everything good about Ethereum will be built on BSV
Explain what "everything good" entails and how you can have it without enabling things like oracles.

Having an $8.5B federal judgement isn't a "PR issue" sweetie.
All nChain employees and mining equipment will be liquidated to pay off debts. This includes Calvins gaming entites / boats / etc. All his money laundering operations will come under severe scrutiny.
In the end, there will be no development team, no miners, no ecosystem, and calvin / csw will be in federal prison before its all over. Screencap this faggot.

Precisely. Also in real world you see 10,000x the places that accept bsv. Has anyone actually found a real world place that accepts bsv for anything? Imagine claiming to be satoshi and not having a single real p2p transaction to show....

>Script reactivation basically means everything good about Ethereum will be built on BSV
This is objectively wrong.

>Bitcoin script does not support loops. Loops are simulated by unrolling. I.e. the loop in the example repeats the statements in the block 5 times. Loops are therefore very expensive in bitcoin script.
It's no competition to Ethereum.

Otherwise, I agree that BCH is the "sane" vision of bitcoin.

Smart contracts that also scale is what will be built on BSV. And of course there will be oracle services that work with BSV-powered businesses. As far as I'm aware it's literally impossible to enforce smart contracts without them. There are so many usecases for Oracles, the list is almost endless.
The oracle business will be enormous and overall profits will be vast. Existing businesses will evolve and several big winners will emerge.

This is just rude. I won't engage with such people.

And Calvin Ayre isn't involved with nChain, I suspect this content may be coming from a mentally unstable individual.

If it can verify a signed piece of data then it is equivalent to OP_CHECKDATASIGVERIFY

Sorry kid, when a conman hires you to be his fluffer it all seems magical until the cops show up. Its all going to come out the illegal things you saw happening, there is no "i was just following orders" defense when it comes to criminal cases.

The point being how does that not make BSV illegal as well. Explain.

There is a difference between using oracles and changing the code of your coin to explicitly promote the use of bucket shops.

Oracles are essentially people in jobs whose job it is to verify that the data used to execute smart contracts is correct. Some people think Bitcoin and AI are taking over everything, but Bitcoin will create more meaningful jobs.

Bucket shops allow for illegal gambling on events that frequently involve criminal activities. It's really night and day.

ps. I just noticed one of my Bitfinex BSV buys did get hit at $182 on the 11th after all. Pretty sweet.

Okay you're just repeating some shit you vaguely remember. The opcode literally just returns true if the signature checks out. It's not "explicitly promoting the use of bucket shops". If BSV cannot perform such a simple operation, it's useless. If it can, it's >promoting bucket shops.

Code isn't law. You can disagree and be wrong. I'm done here for today, though.

>ducking when quoting cregs incoherent ramblings without explaining the reasoning doesn't cut it
Nice.

Daily reminder google is against bsv as it makes them obsolete. They don't even list float SV in a google search.

Attached: 1560463057807.jpg (1162x1065, 85K)

it scares me. The entire BTC market with craig swinging his dick dick around scares me.
I like the tech behind BSV but Im more comfortable putting my capital in the Ethereum side of this market.

The "fuck it let's just use the chain to order data and push any convoluted shit to second layer" is a good idea but Craig is a loon and it won't last.

he's a faggot beta cuck and already proven fraud, off yourself you subhuman shitskin

SAGE

Okay so here:

Tokenized's solution is legal, this is including smart contracts. As long as you can trace every token to the issue event and as long as the code is reviewable, it's legal. DSV is not reviewable. This is the problem. BSV's smart code is law compliant, bch is not.

>DSV is not reviewable.
And BSV is, while providing signature checking, how? The main use case is non-custodial escrow btw.

Actually I don't even get what you mean by reviewable in this context. It checks a piece of data+sig and returns true (presumably to allow X to spend something) if the signature is correct. Break it down, how is this explicitly promoting bucket shops and how could bsv not be crippled and provide smart contracts without accidentally allowing something similar?

I'll add one clear example. The TL;DR, as you'll find out, is indeed that code is not law. People using DSV are trying to get away with bad things, essentially.

"The existing script in Bitcoin allows bitcoin to be used as cash. It can be used for legal and illegal use cases, but, it has a ledger that can act as evidence in court. In the existing format, without ideas such as Pay To Identity it operates within the legal definition of money and currency.

With the proposed alterations to incorporate OP_CHECKDATASIG it is no longer cash. So, the simple response is that this is an attack on what Bitcoin is. Bitcoin is not about circumventing law."

...

In the U.S. this form of “smart contract” forms what is known as “bucketing,” and it is expressly forbidden in commodity transactions, 17 C.F.R. § 30.02(d) (1986).

Summarizing, Bitcoin, to work, has to function as a commodity ledger. This is clear to anyone who takes Bitcoin seriously, I won't explain that further here. It needs to legally function as cash with a commodity foundation. BCH changes that recipe, making it not fit within an existing legal framework, thus making it illegal. You can hereby infer that BSV is not changing the cash properties of its contractual build, therefore it is legal. Essentially what it boils down to is that code =/=, as I said earlier. It's not just a CSW meme.

Full article: medium.com/@craig_10243/drugs-fraud-and-murder-ddf12208ae8b

'The suspense is terrible...I hope It'll last.'

'You both went into the soda room without permission! You both bumped into the ceiling, which must be washed and sterilized, so you get NOTHING! YOU LOSE! GOOD DAY SIR!'

Attached: cr2352113.jpg (646x589, 49K)

oh its a craig article. nevermind.

And basically BSV uses a ledger and BCH can use PayToIdentity. Again, this goes back to easy traceability and reviewability. Just open the link to get an idea of why BCH loves obfuscation and hates law and loves code.

Lol, you lose. If I knew winning was this easy I would have posted a random CSW article. But no, you fuckers made me do research and forced me into re-learning something I had already known. Thanks, faggitz, just bought 100 more K.

>The existing script in Bitcoin allows bitcoin to be used as cash
The examples suggest that using DSV for an actual bucket shop is illegal, not that DSV is illegal. Image viewers can be used for child porn or looking at cats, DSV can be used for non-custodial escrow or bucket shops.

It's so general (LITERALLY VERIFYING SIGNED DATA) that his line of reasoning is laughable.

Fuck off faggot.

He's getting arrested next month

I sold all of my BSV after I realiZed he lost the case. I’m all in link now.

You are a special kind of retarded. This common carrier / specifically & deliberately designed code to allow for illegal activity debate has been held to death.

You think your opinion matters, no court of law will follow this. Maybe in a Banana republic.

It verifies if data was signed with a specific public key or not. Keep drinking the cope aid.

I wonder if that guy posts on biz

Months ago, I specifically made the point that if you could store all data on the blockchain then there would be no need for ChainLink to interface between on and off-chain data and I had never seen anyone mention that before.

Now that exact point is made in as a single point on this site.

Tbh none of that is wrong and it's why I sold some of my link to buy bsv.

If you believe in btc/eth/et. future, link is the best bet imo.

If you are not sure about bsv... Well bsv makes link obsolete if it takes off. No need for an on/off-chain bridge if you have such ridiculous scaling that everything can cheaply be stored on the chain in the first place.