Sub $1. Near future. Screencap this

Sub $1. Near future. Screencap this.

Attached: ChainLink.jpg (1000x850, 223K)

Hopefully. I can always buy more

have 10,000 tether saved for the big dip. Cant wait

Last time I saw a post like this saying it was going to 60 cents it went to 1.94 so fuck you retard this is a BUY SIGNAL

Thanks user

thanks just bought 100k more

I can't say much more than this week is going to deflate the air out of the LINK hopium balloon. Get ready for $0.70 on 6/18

Are you giving us the buy signal? They do say always do the opposite of what Jow Forums says.

>when your average buy in was $0.22 and now "sub $1" is FUD

Attached: Untitled.gif (960x540, 3.96M)

Thank god, think of how much I could buy.

Say more larp.

I would love this, then I can buy more at a better price

Its true

what does sub mean?

It's nonviable before the inevitable $0.25 correction.

submissive

$7 in the near future.

Screencap this. If only you faggots knew.

Attached: 1560301364694.jpg (711x633, 35K)

Unironically I would put the last 10% of my portfolio in link of this happened, so please.

>awoke
it's a type of sandwich

it means to have sex

Wrong.

Bong.

linktards btfo, we come back to $.3 again, link is my pump a dump bitch

Attached: 1530579532930.png (969x1107, 504K)

why? link seems bullish to me right now.

This, every thread for a year about linkies losing money I've been in the black.

>t. OP
>ask my mom if she minds if I move back in for another year
she minds user
you're a fucking weirdo
even your mom says so
she told me to tell you no, you can't move in, not after what happened last time
it's a firm no
bye

Attached: 1558889610568.gif (480x270, 1.9M)

>$7 in the near future.
imagine falling for this FUD

Attached: 1560654807327.jpg (956x1656, 667K)

Attached: hustlin.jpg (744x609, 97K)

Attached: 1508255075363.png (1080x810, 840K)

short for Subway. We're no longer poorfags who eat from Mcdonalds.

Subway

>we come back to $.3
I'd still make a profit.

Wasting life on this boards

sage

go away poo poojeet poopy pants rajeesh newfaggot

Sandeep Uday Bradoo

The boards will make brapping sounds when price goes under ICO again

Since LINK acts as a kind of collateral insurance on smart contracts, the total market cap of the LINK token must equal the total amount of insurance demanded on all the contracts at a given time. This means that both high value contracts, like bonds or real estate transfers, and liquid markets with high amounts of activity, such as derivatives and supply chain, will need enough collateral to back up all the insurance needed on them. This could get rather large if there is a sizeable amount of activity on the network.

Falsehood.

Sub $1 happening

Go back to sleep, cBx

I know too. Feels great, lad.

It's already dipped, holy fuck u guys are like the muh 2k btc guys back i April. U guys are fucking pathetic.

THE TREND IS UP, TRADE WITH THE FUCKING TREND.

Unironically KYS faggots.

How is it false?

I never thought some fat bastard in a plaid shirt would make MY job obsolete

Attached: ubzfvtvaxwncu9csmfx7.jpg (1120x1312, 194K)

Sub 1 cm. Your dick. Right now.

Fud

*BREATHS IN*

WE ARE NEVER FUCKING SELLING, YOU HEAR US, WE ARE LINK MARINES AND WE ARE THE NEXT PIECE TO THE PUZZLE, YOU HEAR ME? WE ARE BASED, WE ARE ORIGINAL, SAY IT WITH ME. WE WILL NEVER FUCKING SELL, WE WILL SPREAD OUR GOD PROTOCOL ACROSS THE RED SEA AND JOIN THE RANKS OF THE FINANCIAL ELITE, Jow Forums IS THE BIGGEST POWER BECAUSE OF CHAINLINK, THE WORLD WILL SEE WHAT WE SEE. STINKY LINKIES

Attached: 1541678552612.jpg (467x700, 130K)

>current amount insured by LINK: $0

This didn’t age well

Near future. Not immediately

Haha haha suuuuub $1

>near future
OP and you sudoku themselves

Attached: hopeless chasm.png (228x81, 12K)

Things aren't going to well for OP.

Hopefully :tired_face:

it will happen, sub $1

I'm sorry everyone

Simply because the market “needs link” to equal collateral doesn’t mean that link will become collateral. You’re reasoning is a tautology. Things that are used as collateral have an underlying value.

Here is your logic:

LINK will be valuable because it will be used as collateral
LINK will be used as collateral because it has value

This proposition doesn’t work, no one will underwrite a smart contract using link as collateral. The whole purpose of collateral is that it is usually a stable and liquid source of value. Imagine if my contract fails and I receive 100 million USD in LINK to sell as my collateral, so I sell the 100 million link which affects the price and the collateral of OTHER contracts. Such a system would be beyond moronic as all the collateral across the entire network of contracts would be a single asset, you would have extreme price sensitivity. No one would do this.

Thanks user! Just sold 650m, phewww that was a close one.

>Look ma, I posted it again!

Attached: 1510864652951.png (403x448, 53K)

Good decision