Funny how even the Twitter LINK shills no nothing about this tweet

This was the pic I wanted to post, not the ISDA connection, but whatever I guess.

Attached: 1518465676788.jpg (1050x700, 441K)

So this article is favorable for chainlink?

"Price Feed. In a derivative where settlement is fully automated, either the
underlying security (or a token representing it) needs to be on the blockchain
already or the blockchain needs to be able to assign a value to the security—
or more precisely, be fed the price it should use in evaluating the code of the
contract. In practice, an entity feeding prices (or any external information)
into a smart contract is called an oracle. Some related work has examined
3
oracles, and we present our decentralized design in Section subsection 4.2
called PriceGeth, which we have made freely available.1"

Digital Asset is there
Our Members > Technology

"Work on trusted oracles and price feeds, in the Ethereum eco-system, include
TownCrier [18] which acts as an attested bridge (running within an SGX enclave)
between trusted sources of information and the Ethereum blockchain."

"Our approach differs from these as PriceGeth publishes the data
to the Ethereum blockchain from the trusted source of information and the
historical data is available to all smart contracts, however in comparison with
the other approaches, is limited to only the published data (Price pairs)."

well whaddyaknow, they got added at some point today.
They were not there earlier today, or the days before.

only if you believe that chainlink are the only ones working on decentralised oracles or that another solution to the problem doesn't exist.

another solution to the problem exists btw.

>A decentralized Price feed is an essential requirement for having a decentralized
derivative market.

What would that be? Dont tell another oracle company

Its too late, they are all too late

>globe earth

>Ctrl + F Chainlink
>0 results

They directly mention smartcontract oracles in the article

yes but link was... and now its not kek

>7 Conclusion
>Even though the idea of having a fully >autonomous and decentralized derivative
>market is intriguing, the infrastructure to reach this goal is still missing from the
>underlying network. As for example, price feed is one of the essentials of such a
>market and it should be done in a fully decentralized trustless way to prevent
>fraud and market manipulation by the feed provider. All the existing solutions
>today, have a central point that can manipulate data, it is either the exchange
>API or the component responsible to publish the price. As discussed before, one
>of the only solutions to this problem is to have a fully decentralized exchange on
>the network to provide realtime price feed for other smart contracts. There are
>some work done on decentralized exchanges [5], although there is no real world
>deployment of such a system at the time of writing. Smart contracts are fascinating idea that can >revolutionize the technology by removing the middlemen,
>however the underlying technology is more on the proof of concept level than
>mature enough to be used on the real world scenarios. We should also mention
>that the barrier for people to have the relevant crypto-currency to work with
>such systems still exists.

it's FUD. there is no other solution other than decentralization and chainlink is too far ahead for any other startup to feasibly catch up.

Neither Link nor Digital Asset were on there a few hours ago.
Both were on there on the old site.

fucking rip to muh 1K eoy moonkiddies
I am TELLING you faggots that we are gonna bleed out hard for the rest of summer

>bleed out with multiple conferences coming up, steady development and PSD2 in september
buy back in while you can swinglinker

Attached: 1559605951827.jpg (231x218, 7K)

>price feed is one of the essentials of such a market and it should be done in a fully decentralized trustless way to prevent
fraud and market manipulation by the feed provider
Based Link shill

I made this research collage a year ago when no one else was talking about CDM and now ISDA is partenered with Accord. CDM will use LINK. I have no doubt about this.

you no nothing johnny snow

This is old and everyone thinks it's a meme even it's not. We're gonna be the new elite.

Attached: 1547239887600.jpg (1567x1253, 361K)

Pretty new for newfags, but I doubt 99% of them have any will to research or to even listen to Sergey's 40 minute talks while paying attention to every word he says.

Attached: 1517973121613.png (1031x569, 872K)

no we won't because most people on this board will sell early, especially nulinkers

Attached: 1560467041684.png (1267x785, 99K)

thanks user

>most people on this board will sell early, especially nulinkers
most people on this board and nulinkers BTFO
the numbers speak for themselves

Attached: 1561000028328.png (1830x1858, 737K)

>muh digital asset
>using the one exception to try and prove another exception
>ignoring the 20+ companies that are listed

Attached: Ephialtes.jpg (1550x661, 294K)

There are more that are/were no longer listed on Accord's new site, like Appg.
Clearly the site is still under construction.
cope

why isn't Rory responding to it? Why is everyone in the accord slack ignoring me?

lmao, are you the faggot in there going "GOOGLE DIDN'T PARTNER WITH CHAINLINK IT'S NOT A PARTNERSHIP"?
If so, that's why everyone's ignoring you; you're an idiot.

>Neet nodes

Lmao

Attached: X-NgvK029jaJVQAnAGs_5RHiBCeuveXdIRLHfGq08t8.jpg (646x767, 69K)

>most people on this board will sell early, especially nulinkers
>mfw chainlink is $1000

Attached: mmm no no no.jpg (750x552, 26K)

not in the telegram. Nice try

>As discussed before, one
>of the only solutions to this problem is to have a fully decentralized exchange on
>the network to provide realtime price feed for other smart contracts.
they are stating that link is useless.

yup

God damn it. I'm pretty much all in but i still have some RLC. might just go all in.

It's really absurd to see linkies using a paper that demolishes link as proof that link is great.
I probably shouldn't be surprised.

unironically bullish for link

people are now fudding link through academic articles. the cope levels are at ATH

Attached: 1558278908842.png (334x506, 292K)

That academic article was written in November 2017
>All the existing solutions today, have a central point that can manipulate data, it is either the exchange API or the component responsible to publish the price
link aims to decentralize 'the component responsible to publish the price' but the exchange api still remains

>what is aggregating and collecting multiple sources

doesn't matter if an exchange api is centralized on its own, chainlink solves this problem

Attached: 1560117643229.jpg (207x244, 7K)

>what is aggregating and collecting multiple sources
a trivial function in a smart contract that takes at most 15 minutes to write

But there's multiple exchanges?

but then it's not secure and there's no significant reduction of trust, essentially eliminating the whole point of a smart contract. you're centralizing things.

nah who am i kidding link is just a json parser, useless crap

Attached: 1558924940217.png (223x225, 27K)

It's secure if data sources sign their data, signatures can be verified on-chain.

Why does this tweet link to a dead article?

twitter.com/accordhq/status/1031022745835003905?lang=en

Accord has clearly dropped Chainlink as they list QUANT as a fucking partner but not LINK on their website. LINKIES BTFO

>Why does this tweet link to a dead article?
Because Accord deleted all but one of all its Medium articles.

good luck bringing all of that data onchain from offchain without an oracle
not possible and doesn't take just "15 minutes" to do that in today's world

This. Once again, OP is a fucking retard.

It just means I call the api and include the signed response in a transaction.

Read the white paper, it cannot be done.

it 100% can be done and you don't understand oracles and ethereum if you think it can't

Someone didn't read the white paper.
It was co-written by Ari Juels, you should read it.

Explain why QUANT is listed as a partner but LINK isnt? CLEARLY CHAINLINK IS NO LONGER BEING USED BY THE ACCORD PROJECT

Until like two hours ago Digital Asset wasn't listed on there either, even though they spoke at Accord's convention earlier this month.

stop using argument by authority
Are you really stating that this sequence of events is impossible:
1. I call 10 different data providers for the same fact, each returns a signed response
2. I push their responses in a transaction to a smart contract that verifies signatures and calculates a median, other average or whatever
3. The result is used in the smart contract
?

Because the relationship between chainlink and accord is now that of a master and his slave.

How desperate are you to use this "hurr sources will sign their own data" fud, which has been debunked over and over again since September of 2017?

So you missed the Google pump, just swallow your pride, take the loss and buy back in.

Sources cannot sign their own data.
Read the white paper, it explains why and has been out for nearly two years now.

Digital asset has been there for over two weeks, someone made up that it had only been added today and you're a fucking moron for believing it. Look at an archived version if you don't believe me you brainlet.

WHY IS QUANT LISTED WHEN THEY HAVE NEVER HAD ANY ANNOUNCEMENTS OR "BREAD CRUMBS" IF LINK IS SO FUCKING IMPORTANT.

>stop using argument by authority
lmao

Just read it you goober.

>has been debunked
>unable to show how
>Sources cannot sign their own data.
what?
>it explains why
no, it doesn't.

>Digital asset has been there for over two weeks
Go to the Jow Forums archives, it's brought up a couple of times.
I saw it myself when it was brought up, Digital Asset was simply not on there.

>HTTPS, the protocol for secure web communications, does not enable data signing
t. white paper

voilà

read again, there are only 3 steps

Attached: 1550206320176.jpg (361x408, 19K)

So you agree that sources can't sign their own data?

Every normal crypto transaction is data signed by the source - that's what the signature means - if signing was impossible no blockchain would even work.
The quote refers to downloading unsigned data through https, which indeed has no inbuilt signing capability, it doesn't mean the api can't intentionally provide signed data, whether through https or not is irrelevant.

here you go faggot

Attached: accord site wayback archive digital asset not on there.png (1852x894, 119K)

>Every normal crypto transaction is data signed by the source
>crypto transaction
We're talking about external data here.

Read the white paper.

>Every normal crypto transaction is data signed by the source - that's what the signature means - if signing was impossible no blockchain would even work.
You have no idea what blockchains and oracles are, omfg.
Forget about reading the Chainlink white paper, start here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockchain

>We're talking about external data here.
what's a transaction before it's included in blocks?
look you're missing fundamentals on how it all works.
Here's a tutorial on how to sign a message with the key of your ethereum account
blog.tenx.tech/sign-message-instructions-for-ethereum-address-verification-2c8caee4c3af
everyone can sign anything with their key, including you.

Https is only one of methods of transporting data, it doesn't limit the transported data in any way.

Here's Vitalik explaining how Oracles are ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY for adding external data to blockchain:
>The most common case that will appear in reality is the case of external data;
>sometimes, you want a financial contract that uses the price of the US dollar, and you can’t cryptographically determine that just by doing a few hashes and measuring ratios.
>In this case, oracles are absolutely necessary.
>IN THIS CASE, ORACLES ARE ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY

Stop posting now and read the white paper.
Your shit fud was debunked years ago.

so where is digital asset? I'm not seeing it

accordproject.org/membership/

An oracle is an external entity that provides signed data. A signed response from an exchange makes that exchange an oracle.

>he's still posting

accordproject.org/about

Under the technology tab.
They weren't on there a few hours ago though, see

I'm not actually writing to you, even if it appears so. Your responses demonstrate inability to perform basic abstract thinking, meaning you don't qualify as human. Instead, I'm writing to actual people that may read this thread.
Hope this clears any misunderstanding.

Nobody mentioned telegram you numbskull

>"hurrrr you don't need oracles if sources sign their own data!"
t. you

>"oracles are absolutely necessary for external data"
t. Vitalik

Fuck off.

>What would that be?
>Don't give me an answer, any answer you give is wrong
Do you see how retarded you sound?

>"hurrrr you don't need oracles if sources sign their own data!"

>It's secure if data sources sign their data, signatures can be verified on-chain.
are those two sentences equivalent to your brainlet brain?

There is zero reason to bring up "sources will sign their own data" unless you're trying to claim that makes oracles obsolete.

See for instance.

You're just pivoting because you got btfo.

>There is zero reason to bring up "sources will sign their own data" unless you're trying to claim that makes oracles obsolete.
and here's the lack of abstract thinking: a data source becomes an oracle because it self-signs. You continue to think about it as two separate entities.

>a data source becomes an oracle because it self-signs
Data sources can run their own oracles, yes.

They are desperate, comedy gold. Shit is funny. Pssst..it's going back up keep on fudding.

Put the parking brake in neutral and release the tangerines.

Well said, lmfao .

WHY DO YOU FAGGOTS KEEP IGNORING THAT QUANT IS LISTED THERE WITH NO ANNOUNCEMENTS BUT CHAINLINK ISNT??? YOU FUCKING RETARDS DONT GET IT!

Quant was announced on twitter in 2018 just like Link, calm down.

IT IS SO FUCKING CLEAR THAT DIGITAL ASSET USED CHAINLINKS OPEN SOURCE TECHNOLOGY TO MAKE A BETTER SOLUTION FOR THE ACCORD PROJECT. FUCK WAKE UP YOU RETARDS, GOOGLE DIDN'T EVEN ENDORSE CHAINLINK ONE OF THEIR DEVS DID.