Can BTC and BSV coexist? Or will 1 truly kill the other?

Attached: 1.jpg (812x1015, 119K)

Other urls found in this thread:

github.com/bitcoin-sv/bitcoin-sv
dsn.tm.kit.edu/bitcoin/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

They could co-exist, but csw and calvin are both going to be charged for their different various crimes...so they will take themselves out of it

can gold and gold colored rocks coexist?
or will one kill the other?

I mean BTC and BitConnect also coexisted

as soon as there is proof (for any case) one of the two are going to crash

can your OP Pic and Pic Related coexist ? Or will you get married to the wrong one ? Questions, questions

Attached: rawImage[1].jpg (480x600, 68K)

there already is proof. CSW has lied repeatedly
even if you believe is trust narrative, he then lies about that

i just wanted to put it neutral, but yes i think csw is a scam, i know all of this

No way. BSV will slay BTC

BITCONNEEEEEEEEEECT!

CSW is the only person who really understands Bitcoin.
Transaction malleability? That way on purpose.
Turing complete? CSW was making that claim in 2016.
Small world graph? He proved it in 2017.
Threshold signatures, paymail, esda web certs. No one understands it better than he does.

just read his blog, there is enough bullshit there to convince you otherwise

Bingo

He's the smartest guy in the room

>Turing complete
haha...excellent bait given the real satoshis stance on that topic

where do you even download BSV's fullnode?

sure they can co-exist but not in any meaningful way

can copper and gold exist? sure, but nobody gives a fuck about mining copper or holding copper

nobody knows. it's a shitcoin scam.

>Smartest guy in the room
>The room is a bsv conference

Vinjooosh? Is that you son?

Attached: images (4).jpg (271x186, 12K)

due to fundamental limitations due to block time propagation and how it relates to orphan rate, the block size cannot be increased to keep the same level of consistency without decreasing the 90 percentile network propagation by the same proportion

this cannot be done with the same network topology as bitcoin which is in nature extremely decentralized

to do that, you need a robust delivery network for Bitcoin, a strong P2P overlay if you will, alongside with a really good compression system

BSV doesn't offer any of this. If they want to deploy GB blocks, as soon as it hits mainnet, the network will fragment beyond repair

github.com/bitcoin-sv/bitcoin-sv

>bitcoin which is in nature extremely decentralized
this is the only thing corecucks talk about, sorry you can't buy your illegal items on BSV without traceability

>If they want to deploy GB blocks, as soon as it hits mainnet, the network will fragment beyond repair
wrong. the size of blocks doesn't affect the confirmation validity

Attached: 1542853010799.jpg (1200x600, 181K)

true believers want bitcoin at scale and in that world there will be only one bitcoin

Attached: satoshi48.png (1920x1080, 1.39M)

>wrong. the size of blocks doesn't affect the confirmation validity

In what world it doesn't you fucking retard? Good luck having your blockchain propagated only in Azure and AWS.

>what is s c a l a b i l i t y ?
billy weighs 100lbs and can carry 25lbs
billy worked out and now weighs 200lbs and can carry 50lbs
>wuuuuuut

Holy shit, you really are a motherfucking retard. For a second I thought you might be just trolling.

look up something called orphan rate and how it is affected by network propagation

there's literally a math formula for this that you can experimentally verify using data here: dsn.tm.kit.edu/bitcoin/