QUANT (QNT)

>he does not know Quant has only 3.8k holder wallets.

Except for this one. I suggest you look it up.

FUCK OFF. Enough of this. Even if its sarcastic, its not even funny.

ABSOLUTELY SEETHING. market cap and circulating supply alone should tell you this is going to take off. then look at enterprise adoption. this will moon for same reason link is and will continue to. don't even get why you retards are fudding you have plenty of time before it goes parabolic when listed somewhere other than IDEX

lmao I read a lot of stupid shit here but this takes the cake.
>smart contract auditing flipping btc
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Smart contract auditing?
user, I...

This is Quant, not QuantStamp...

>you

after reading this im bullish as fuck , this shit is going to 500$

medium.com/@CryptoSeq/quant-networks-overledger-part-seven-the-qnt-token-d6b945ea15f1

is 1.2k a good side stack? have vast majority of folio in LINK

1,2k will make it within 3 years, user.

Is this fud or just stupidness?

Hahaha we call it a scam ironically but we really want you to buy it haha you get it? It's funny because it's the opposite. Fags.

Fag, stop fudding this gem.

Quant is a scam

Fucking stop this bullshit

Hahahahhaha user you are so funny. If we keep saying this in every thread maybe some anons will ironically take a look at quant for the meme lmao.

This is so genius now i know why you say this in every thread.

QUANT IS A SCAM

Quanties think they are the next TCP/IP to rule the world, yet a proprietary software that you need to pay a license fee for will never be a global international standard.

They think Chainlink can't connect blockchains together... but it can and so can so many other protocols with much more determinism, less trust, and cheaper.

The whole point in using a decentralized backend like a blockchain is to get deterministic services, yet they think using a trusted software to run all your transactions through is logical. In fact, it ruins the entire value proposition.

They think of themselves as the connector of all blockchains yet it's proprietary software and you need to pay a license to use. Again, it doesn't make sense to use proprietary software to leverage decentralized backends.

There is also a major problem in their tokenomics model. There is no way of actually knowing how the token is used since everything is negotiated behind closed doors. They say you have to hold it to get a license fee, but how can anyone prove it? They say you pay to sign data like transaction fee but no one can prove that either. There are no on-chain metrics to prove anything unlike all other protocols. Essentially, they have central control over the pricing of the entire protocol. For all we know they could be doing a freemium model with these companies to test out to see if they like it. Also, with it being proprietary, how do we know that there are no backdoors built in? Quant is simply not compatible with deterministic systems.

Then don’t get me started about Shillbert always hyping up the coin and nothing to show. If Quant is so big, why is he shilling all the time to neets? Look at Chainlink and then look at smug Gil taking pictures in his “fancy” meetings. All these partnerships are exploratory, yet the community thinks billions are flowing through the network. There is zero transparency about what's actually going on since it's proprietary. They will be an STO

> Proprietary software will never be a global international standard

Who says it has to? The proprietary enterprise software industry is worth half a trillion dollars. Oracle makes $40 billion a year selling business critical proprietary software to enterprise.

> They think chainlink can't connect blockchains together

Quant currently connects 10 together. Right now. And it handles the gas/transaction fees for all 10 blockchains in a seamless way. Chainlink does neither of those things.

> Muh deterministic services

Sure man that's obvious and it's why no enterprise is interested in Quant. Oh wait, S.I.A the backbone of the European financial system is. Unless you're saying that you, the basement dwelling NEET, has managed to see something that the team at S.I.A have not despite numerous high level technical meetings with Quant. You wouldn't claim something that retarded user, would you?

> It doesn't make sense to use proprietary software to leverage decentralized backends

It does if the enterprise saves millions of dollars, which is all they give a shit about.

> Muh tokenomics model

Quant are highly incentivized to use QNT for licensing as it will make them far richer compared to if they don't. Yeah, maybe they'd intentionally avoid making themselves hundreds of millions of dollars richer, although I'm not sure why.

> Muh backdoors

Well 90% of enterprise systems are run on some kind of closed source proprietary software, including all banks, so the people that matter (i.e. the wealthy ones) don't seem to give a fuck.

> Don't get me started about Shillbert

Okay, I won't.

> Community thinks billions flowing muh

No it doesn't.

This pasta again? Seriously?

Don't get dumped on who cares thta Shillbert is wining and dining with high ranking political movers and shakers all over the world. It's a scam.

Proprietary software is great, but you wouldn't use it with decentralized systems, especially when all your value is flowing through it. It's way to big a of a security vulnerability, especially when all the value flows through it like Quant is trying to do.

Chainlink does connect blockchains together and while it doesn't handle gas fees, there will sure be additional services that can if you want to pay for it. Think BaaS and over fiat ramp extensions to make all payments in fiat.

SIA is exploring Quant. That is not the same as the European system running through it. Also, some enterprises are stuck in centralization, which is that same thing that happened when large companies were afraid to adopt the Internet and afraid to adopt cloud technology. Companies do make poor choices user.

You can say Quant incentivizes token use but you literally will have no proof other than their word. You have to trust them and that's a major problem in their model. Their whole pricing model is centralized, which should make it a security. It's also why they will become an STO.

Fucking fud. Gtfoh

Yup
Be careful anons

> Lloyds Bank confirmed client
> Working with Mastercard on blockchain service
> Multiple Fortune 500 and FTSE100 companies partnerships/clients under NDA
> Partnered with Chinese Government Ministry of Commerce
> Partnered with Indian Government of Andra Pradesh
> Partnered with Armenian Government Ministry of Technology
> Partnered with University College London
> Partnered with Germany Hamburg University
> Partnered with Cognizant & DXC
> Partnered with Accord Project
> Partnered with AI Nexus
> Integrating Overledger with Zapier
> Held talks with USA Dept. of Homeland Security
> Held talks with Samsung
> Held talks with FTSE 100 company who wanted to acquire Quant Network
> Held talks with 2nd largest Venture Capitalist firm
> Held talks with UK tax office HMRC
> Announcement with large US bank coming soon
> Huobi/Bitfinex coming soon
> Building Enterprise Blockchain solution to compete with Hyperledger
> Building an upstream Power Exchange. Allowing for P2P Power networks (like Powerledger) to cross-exchange with other P2P Power networks.
> Possibly building Decentralized Exchange (DEX) or Digital Bank
> SDK already released which connects Ethereum, Bitcoin, Ripple, Hyperledger, IOTA and JP Morgan’s Quorum blockchains. Stellar and Corda on the todo list. Possibly Bitcoin Cash and Litecoin next.
>CEO worked in Downing St, HM Treasury, Cabinet Office and Ministry of Justice. Holds role at US Federal Reserve
> CEO founder of TC ISO 307 (46 countries and organizations are working on developing global Blockchain ISO Standard)
> Cofounder is blockchain advisor to European Union and United Nations

Quant
is
a
...
...
...
...
...LEGIT PROJECT lolol