1bn is the ground floor

$100 QNT (1bn cap) is the ground floor for QNT, the real starting point.

We are currently deep in basement levels.

$100 is the minimum basic value for this thing, and we will make predictions of 10,50,100x+ from there onwards.

Attached: quant.png (145x110, 9K)

i only have 135
im not going to make it :/

I've got 1740, already preordered my Lambo

There are so far 4 coins/tokens/whatever that are going to be the most important contributions to the future of the global digital ecosystem.

BTC
ETH
LINK
QNT

I am not going to go into the reasons why each of these will go to prices in which normal households will not even be able to afford a SINGLE one, because A. It would take too much of my energy, and B. If you don’t know already, you’ll never know and should just kill yourself for not owning any or all of these 4.

Screencap this and save it for $10 years. Bye.

Amazes me that one of the biggest fud points for Quant is "muh useless token" when it's actually one of the few projects to use its token for a crucial technical utility purpose.

QNT will be used to sign and verify data passing through Overledger, which is something it's very useful for as it's decentralized and immutable.

All Quant said earlier on the development is they were still figuring out the finer details of the treasury and tokenomics system. Not that they were figuring out what to actually do with the token. It's always been integral this way. It's critical to how Overledger works, and makes it a bona fide utility token as per FINMA guidelines.

The fact is, Overledger usage and adoption = QNT goes up. Licensing and usage will require market buys of QNT, whether the client does it themselves, or the Quant Treasury does it on their behalf.

With Quant's FA and the SIA partnership, they seriously could end up surpassing Ripple in terms of fintech adoption in the not too distant future. Not to mention the many hundreds of other industries in which Overledger instantly removes the barriers to using blockchain technology.See you plebs at 1B cap

Unironically I can see Link and Quant being the drivers behind global DLT adoption.

Blockchains themselves are not the bottleneck anymore. We have loads of them all ready to use, including many private blockchains popping up such as Quorum etc.

The main bottlenecks, the main barriers holding adoption back, are accessibility and interoperability of the already established blockchains. Enterprises want easy and secure ways to connect external data, and to create systems that leverage multiple blockchains simultaneously with seamless cross-communication between them. They don't just want to connect to one blockchain. They want to connect to an internet of blockchains.

Projects like Quant and Link are some of the very few projects that have recognised this and are working to make it happen. They're the next-gen projects, and it's going to show this year, big style.

Please don't put Quant and Link into the same realm.

You’re right, Quant is going to outperform Link price wise if that’s all you care about.... however both are extremely important per my post abovr

I agree it will pump but that's because the crypto community isn't that smart. It has some serious security vulnerabilities that no sane developer would touch, especially when the whole point of dlt is increased security and no trust needed.

“Hey. I took a look at quant network. I like the design for how they want to deal with blockchain interoperability from an organizational and application developer perspective but they completely leave out the security that is the reason why blockchains exist in the first place. Blockchain technologies were decentralized to run across thousands of servers so that hackers would need to hack more than half of them to break the system. These systems are very vulnerable and centralized to their servers and your blockchain data is completely at risk when going through this platform. A hacker could take over these systems and completely disrupt or destroy the blockchain data sent between different blockchains. I would not trust my data to go through this system and I don’t think knowledgeable blockchain developers would either.”

how does it sign transactions on a proprietary software?

The overledger tech isnt even a blockchain why does it need a token?

Exactly,why trust a proprietary closed source OS when you can use google integrations of LINK to speak to any chain you want?

Not just speak to any chain, but to any on or off chain system. You can also design the connection anyway your want whether centralized, decentralized, confidential, etc. Flexibility with more guarantees and likely more access because of greater pemissionless network effects.

QNT is locked by Treasury to get an access key. mApp transactions need to be encrypted & signed locally using the key to enforce confidentiality & integrity. Each mApp gets its own key. QNT pays for transactions & computation, and serves as an anti-DDOS mechanism. A minimum hold is required.

The problem is everything is done by the treasury behind closed doors. Have to trust everything they say. You will never have any idea what is going on compared to every other dlt projects where fees are paid for by users in an open market. There is no way this isn't a security. This isn't going to end well.

I've only got 200 but bought at $1.50. so comfy with this one

You know, I look at a theory like this, and I only have one question:

If it's THIS obvious that Quant supposedly undermines the whole point of blockchain, therefore instantly making its product useless, then why the fuck are large fintech organizations like SIA, that provides critical services to the global financial system, showing enough of an interest to publicly announce a partnership to integrate Overledger?

What you're suggesting isn't particularly clever. In fact if it's true it's pretty obvious even to brainlets. That means SIA and other partners would have spotted it in minutes and dismissed Quant as a waste of time.

Yet Quant have had months worth of technical meetings with fintech companies like SIA and others. They've discussed Overledger on a technical level far more in-depth than we know about. And guess what? They like it. And they really don't seem to give a shit about anything you've suggested.

The only logical explanation is that Quant is nowhere near as centralized and trust oriented as you think it is. It's that simple.

QUANT AND CHAINLINK ARE BROTHERS

The explanation is simple. They are likely exploring it using a freemium model. They also are likely still in the mindset of control through centralization, which is similar to companies who were afraid in the early days of giving up control to cloud technologies. Many companies will make short term decisions because of comfort without seeing the long term changing trend.

Who said QNT undermines blockchain? Whoever said that unironically has autism lol

This is a big red flag for me. How do we know if their product is being used at all?

Damn they are mooning like hell, guess i missed this one

You don't. There are no public metrics unless the ones provided by the team directly. Everything flows through them which requires 100% trust in them.

$9.60 right now wow wtf I really should’ve bought at $.86 lol

On one side, i understand this, because it does involve some central banks. But still, they could provide us with some transactions flowing through the overledger to show it is actually being used. Or a link to the treasury wallet.

samefag

> Attempts to FUD quant
> End up describing some of its best features

my fucking face when

Lol, there is nothing you can say on this, cuz it's true.

That's not an explanation. According to you, the way you think Overledger works (which is based 100% on assumptions) would undermine all the benefits of using DLT. So if you're right, there's no point trying or testing anything. Yet they're showing serious interest.

So we have two possible scenarios. Scenario 1:

> Ex-CISO of the year, with 20 years experience in high-level enterprise, and regular speaker/panel member of blockchain and fintech conferences, comes up with an idea for blockchain interoperability that works.

> Quant has technical meetings with the SWIFT of Europe. After learning about the technical details (that you don't know anything about) they like it, they want to move forward with it, and they publicly announce it.

> Overledger doesn't work in the way you think it does. It gives the companies the benefits they want, and it's going to be a major success.

Scenario 2:

> Autist with no achievements that browzes Biz instantly sees extremely basic flaws in Quant that major institutions have been unable to despite numerous technical meetings.

> Autist does this despite knowing nothing about Quant on a technical level, making numerous assumptions with no basis.

> Overledger does work in the way you think it does, and has brainlet-level flaws that major fintech and blockchain companies were unable to spot, but only you did.

Sorry user, anyone with more than a single digit IQ can see that scenario 1 is unfathomably more likely.

Only got 40 if them :(

Glad I put my first ever paycheck into it though.

LMAO you are literally retarded.

The fud is incredible, you won't stop Quant. It's destined to be a top 5 project.

FUCKING CHECKED.

QNT IS UUNFUDDABLE. THE PEOPLE HAVE WOKEN UP.

Don't dyor this scam. Close this thread and buy Link or BSV. Big mac memes are so funny lol. Stiff, amirite?

Do not buy quant till $25 u will get wrecked if u buy before then!

Stop telling people about it desu. I want to accumulate before the redditards realise

Thanks, I got my buy orders set at $25

Redpilled af.