I assume people who made it on link the last couple of days since the coinbase listing dont post anymore

>When Chainlink captures a quadrillion dollar market cap, that will make each of the billion tokens one million dollars each.
I fucking hate you reddit ripple faggots. ChainLink isn't going to charge fucking 100% of the money going through it you retard it's going to charge around .002% per call like every other industrial fintech API network.

You retards take the 1:1 collateral meme too literally.

Attached: 1555563330332.webm (800x450, 1.45M)

Link investors have invested like $50 because that's all they had on their account, spending their time on shitposting instead of working.

Do you know the market cap of the largest company in the world? You’ve been fooled my friend . Do some research .

You're lying through your teeth and its easy to catch

>pants on head retarded
It's only going to capture 1/4 of what ever it saves those industries. If it saves insurance companies 10 billion dollars, then it adds 2.5 billion to market cap.

NEW PARADIGM!

>Tell me what's so delusional about it then
I cannot stress this enough: what is delusional is that you think they're charging 100% of the money going through it.

>Hello I'd like to process a 100 million dollar wire transfer and I'd like to use your network to bring this onto the blockchain so it can be handled by superior auditing software
>"sure thing sir, that will be 100 million please"
I hate you so much because unlike actual fud you legitimately believe the dumb shit you post and it makes everyone around you look retarded by association.

What in the world are you talking about, you don't charge 100% of the money that goes through your network. 8/10 if this is trolling cause I mad.

>our bank would like to use chainlink to log CD interest
>chainlink node: "wonderful, pay me all of the CD interest and I'll record it"
I hate you so much.

I remember so many people posting they had 100k+ stacks. You don’t see those people posting anymore. (I wouldn’t either) But I’m pretty sure they’re still here.

You obviously have no idea how Chainlink works then. Read the whitepaper

Fuck here have another one.

>Our insurance company wants to handle our automatic flight cancellations based on weather, to save money. We'll use ChainLink to handle all refunds based on flights canceled by storm, no human interaction needed!
>ChainLink Node: "Yes I'll give all your refunds to every customer who is owed whenever a flight is canceled due to rain thanks to this weather API. All it will cost is 100% of what you're paying each customer."
You're so fucking stupid and I hope you grow smarter some day. I really do.

So just your guy’s opinion.... You think there would be much demand for a Chainlink node offering stock market prices?

YEP JUST CALL SOMEONE WRONG WITH NO REBUTTAL AND CHARGE ONE HUNDRED PERCENT

Attached: 1505306967431.png (400x460, 94K)

2 at lowest
seems to be stabilizing somewhere between 3.10 amd 3.70

>What is inspect page tool

>Goddamn it I should have bought more.
My first thought of the day after I wake up and look at the price

You don't understand, Sergey HOPES all API calls in the world will eventually go through Chainlink. He currently has 0 users, but he HOPES.

Are you stupid or what? Don't you understand that he HOPES to go from 0 users to every single user in the whole world. Doesn't his HOPE mean anything to you? Don't you think his HOPE is worth 4 billion $? You must be stupid. When someone HOPES something, it's definitely worth 4 billion $.

Dont get caught holding the bags while other coins take off faggot. Mandatory post-link biz suicide bags: FTM, MATIC, VIDT,

Its worked in the past, why can't it now hm longnose?

Lol thanks for that user just bought 0

>Chainlink aims to capture all of the insurance and derivatives markets
Wait you mean that Chainlink AIMS to capture all the derivative markets? It currently has 0 users, but it AIMS to have all these users. Holy shit, I'm putting my life savings into this. When a team AIMS to do something, it's definitely going to happen. I mean they currently have 0 users, but when someone AIMS to do something, that's some serious business. That's definitely worth 4 billion $ valuation. That I know for a fact. It's simple math.

Kek. Someone could already do this on BSV using the weather app already on chain.

You cannot compare a company with a collateral token. You can use as example the financial assets in a bank and their stock value.

>Say a lie
>Get called out, your flaws explains
>Use insults instead of rebuttal
>get two more proper examples to disprove your lies
>call opponent jewish instead of explaining why you think LINK will charge 100% of all money that goes through its nodes
That's some serious pilpul

Attached: Im going all out and taking this retards bait on July 1st 2019.png (490x272, 291K)

Nope. They posted the addresses of their wallets to prove it.

Kek

>BSV can already run an API that's on chain!
The point of the oracle network is that you don't have to recreate every API in existence.

>But we already recreated this one!
Cool beans. Now if you'll excuse me I'm back to the actual conversation, where me and a retard or troll both call each other a dirty misleading jew.

Attached: 6edfa494e92170e49b161d03798ee44f-free-shrugs.jpg (600x857, 85K)

I don’t think those words mean what you think they mean

why are people betting their life savings on a technology that some company/government will just reproduce for themselves

Nope. They posted their addresses you could go look at their wallets on etherscan. Not really outlandish at all though. I used to have 55k myself...

You can't call me Jewish back. I need this money more than they do.

They already did, but they needed to call it decentralized to attract the organic open source communities that make them free money. They don't want anyone fucking over the integrity of the network so they'd keep 2/3 of it for their corporate connections, and they'd probably want to keep the press away from it until they're ready. Don't want too much going to actual randos too so they should make the ICO minimum-buy around 100 Etherium. Sound like anything you know?

Attached: 1423536489004.png (749x500, 329K)

Sure, meanwhile data is being stored and called on bsv without chainlink.

>onchain data is being called onchain
Okay, have fun. This isn't about you.

Probably you are the one who does not know how to differ a guarantee contract from a company value in the market.

Lol I mean middle wear is neat, but if all the data I need is all present and accountable already onchain that kinda eliminates the need for it.

Well the thing is non-programmers really get fooled by the term "oracle". They think it's some complex thing that takes months and months to code.

The fact is a simple oracle is maybe 5 lines of code. Takes 5 minutes.

An oracle with more functions like with aggregation and rewards for delivering data is maybe 1000 lines of code. Takes a day or 2.

It's extremely trivial to make. What Chainlink has created so far is extremely trivial, that's why no developer will actually use it. (none are right now, and the test net has been out for months).

Now if they created decentralized oracles, that would be another story. That would be complex and valuable. But they have not done that. They are pretty much larping about their oracles being decentralized. They also have made pretty much 0 advancement towards making them decentralized. They've pretty much been larping for 2 years. It's not close to being done. They haven't even started working on the decentralized design.

>Every single API and database should be recreated on the blockchain.
Just stop man you came off as passable shill with accomplishment before but now you're coming off as a shill AND a retard.

>Oracle openly lied about decentralization at CloudExpo
Or
>BSV pajeet lied on an anonymous message board
How are you two even here? This isn't about your BCash ripoff, go home.

$1 quintillion market cap would put LINK at a billion bucks each bro

Yeah many if not most would be. Even if someone using bsv for some reason needed to use a service like Link it wouldn't be Link. It would be something else and that person would pay a microtransaction for the service in bsv. "Tokenomics" is fucking retarded. Your premined shitcoin is going to zero.

>1 quadrillion in derivatives market
>assume chainlink captures 100% of it
>0.002% cut for nodes
>comes out to ~$20 a LINK
>assuming 7% annual return on investment for staking, LINK would be valued at ~$300
What the fuck, where do people get the $1000 figure from?

only newfags and redditfags sold, 16k here didnt touch a link, you would be really really stupid to sell right now

Nobody is "Making it" on the scale of 1M+ dollars until we hit $50, $100 then $1000 stop larping as if people are making millions of dollars. 90% of people have a link stack of 1000-5000 and the rest of the 10% is 5K+.

Attached: 1561095556586.png (600x664, 429K)

Google and Oracle haven't lied. They don't really care about how decentralized Chainlink is. Decentralized is subjective. Chainlink thinks they are decentralized, but in my opinion they are not.

KYC is not decentralized and they could add a million nodes with their current design it's still not gonna remove the need for KYC. Without KYC there's no reputation and they haven't even started designing the reputation, hence they haven't started working on making it decentralized.

I have bad news for you. You have low IQ. And Chainlink is taking advantage of that.

>The absolute state of chainlink investor

Anyone who already "made it" from LINK was rich to begin with.

This.

>muh "decentralized" KYC oracles

OH NO NO NO AHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHA

Attached: LOL.gif (350x193, 3.01M)

I'm still here

Got $1m worth of link

Can't retire till $5m

But then I'll probably still keep mostly in link until $100/link

What does that have to do with the cost of tea in China?
>Most APIs and databases will be completely remade to be placed on chain
Dude, no. I've been trying to be nice and treat you like BSV matters at all but stop. You're dinosaurwear and being proud about your weakness.

>"0.002% cut for nodes" example
Did you get those numbers from where I posted them in another thread about an hour ago? I'm flattered if so, had to argue with two equal idiots in two different threads.

>blah blah talk around the point
No. Oracle, who works with ChainLink, stated ChainLink is decentralized. Either they lied or they did not. You can't pussyfoot around this and pretend anything else you say matters.

Anyways, seems the original pajeet called in his discord, this thread is lost to people pretending anyone is talking about BitCoin Cash's BitCoin Cash SVLGBT. I'm out, goodnight guys

Attached: 1543886029201.jpg (312x240, 39K)

What does that have to do with me running train on your fat mom last night?

>No. Oracle, who works with ChainLink, stated ChainLink is decentralized. Either they lied or they did not. You can't pussyfoot around this and pretend anything else you say matters.
What's your point? Facebook also said Libra was decentralized. "Decentralized" is a meme word that can be interpreted any kind of way.

But your IQ is too low to understand that. Your IQ is so low that you don't do your own research. You don't actually understand programming or the technology. You don't even understand the nature of the endorsement the big company is giving. You just see "BIG NAME COMPANY" and you give all your money, like the low IQ sheep that you are.

>dinosaurwear
Are fucking kidding me? Youre on a chain with infinite supply. How many transactions can you pump out on eth and how are scripts executed. Your goddamn chain was broken by digital cats. Talking about relevancy coming from a fucking erc20 shittoken. You think Bitcoin doesn't because you fell for the BTC meme.