Is the assumption that eth itself will scale.
Chance my mind
Is the assumption that eth itself will scale.
Chance my mind
Based InfoWars
Threshold Signatures
It's the assumption that for whatever reason the main hypothetical user of Link will ever want to use it, which is unlikely. It's a simple SaaS that is not even decentralized, honestly not sure what it's purpose is.
I'm coping with the mistake I made and waiting for at least a bit of a pump before I sell, but Chainlink was a mistake and I fucking hate Jow Forums for selling me this snake oil.
how doi chance youyr mind
this is why you go all in on holochain
Literally every other smart contract platform is total shit so you better fucking hope ETH scales brainlet
Stop spoonfeeding the redditors they can dyor
The only thing that matters is vendor adoption which is why I didn't buy LINK when it was a meme. If ETH fails but you have vendors using your product you can just switch to a different platform even if it needs an entire rewrite.
what if decentralized smart contract platforms pretending to be money were a mistake?
This. Also ETH will scale.
>infowars
>based
back to the_donald redditor zionism enabler newfag. alex jones is a ravenous zionist, probably at the same level as warmonger ben shapiro, which you probably also think is based. kys
Sorry I don't fud, but I will stop responding to them.
It doesn't even matter, the link tokens can be batch distributed and the speed of delivery is not a concern
Same here marine they dont deserve it
It seems clear at this point that ETH will be able to scale eventually. It's only a matter of time.
ETH 2.0 scales
not that scaling matters
I own 300k you fucking dumbfucks. I literally never go to reddit. Never. I’ve been on biz every day looking at your fucking vomit inducing trap and scat porn for 2 years now and I’m going to need years of therapy to recover from the depraved shit you sperg basement dwellers post on here. I’ve been saying the same thing since day fucking one in Jan 2018 when I bought in, and no one has yet to answer it because there ARE no known answers.
EVEN IF threshold signatures work flawlessly, that only scales link in the NUMBER OF NODES IN THE *link* NETWORK YOU STUPID SUBHUMAN FAILED ABORTION MOUTHBREATHING PAJEETS, *NOT* IN THE TOTAL NUMBER OF UNIQUE DATA REQUESTS
In a serious derivatives market there will be millions of requests daily. And that’s only for the derivative application of eth, barring everything else, and there are literally millions of other applications eth will be used for, clogging the network to a halt.
Right now, ethereum is only good for a limited amount of token transfers, and even if chainlink scales as it claims it will thats irrelevant: the problem will remain the case on the ethereum chain for all the hundreds of unique data sources requested.
Sergey knows this, the team knows this, everyone seriously involved in the project knows this.
We may have a short term speculation run to $20 and if that’s the case I’m offloading most of my bags. None of you fucking retards understand that this FUD is legitimate and that there are serious technical obstacles in the way to mass adoption that no one really knows will be resolved, because the vast majority of you are sub 100 iq, have no idea how ethereum actually works, have never programmed, know no economics or history, and just bought in for the memes
My prediction: eth 2.0 will have a critical bug just like all POS systems do which will destroy the currency. In which case link will have its DAO moment and real
Marines will be separated from the posers
uhh no. Shapiro hates the new testament.....AJ is a christian. I dont like ben at all
ETH will scale with RLC
Sounds about right.
This
Only a matter of time until Sergey takes the Holochain pill. Screencap this. In the end, all roads lead to Holochain.
You, a fucking idiot, parrot this incorrect assumption. Fucking die.
Try having sex buddy
have sex
It doesn’t need to be as decentralized as you think.