IExec RLC vs LINK

____iExec RLC____
Oracle Solution+ Decentralized Cloud Computing Marketplace + Data Marketplace
>Marketcap- ~30M

>Total Supply- 86,999,785 RLC
>Circulating- 80,070,793 RLC
>Developer holding- ~6,700,000 RLC(12.9%supply)
>Dev funds haven't moved for 489 days.
>Mainnet active.
>Great partnerships/collaborations
>Never talked about outside of Jow Forums.
____________________
____LINK____
Decentralized Oracle Solution
>Marketcap- ~1.2B

>Total Supply- 1,000,000,000 LINK
>Circulating-350,000,000 LINK
>Developer holding- 650,000,000(65%supply)
>Dev funds have moved within the past 24 hours, to Binance, and were sold.
>Mainnet active.
>Great partnerships/collaborations
>Talked about often outside of Jow Forums.

These are the cold facts. Tell me which you think is a better investment.

Attached: IEXECVSLINK.png (1146x727, 87K)

Other urls found in this thread:

medium.com/iex-ec/rlc-token-state-of-the-exchanges-a2554a242d42
youtube.com/watch?v=aR5N2Jl8k14
medium.com/iex-ec/iexec-selected-as-a-winner-of-the-investment-for-the-future-programme-by-bpi-a-french-public-45d486d317fd
medium.com/iex-ec/iexec-moves-forward-collaboration-with-intel-and-alibaba-cloud-at-rsa-conference-2019-ccc1f119f2ae
ibm.com/cloud/blog/iexec-integrates-ibm-cloud-to-increase-the-security-of-decentralized-computing
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

LINK, unironically. But RLC could give 10x gains if we had another alt season.

Can you elaborate why?

RLC is way more risky than LINK.

Can you explain shortly why iExec is risky compared to LINK when comparing these facts?

LINK is already listed on Coinbase, iExec has only 1m daily volume.

Coinbase listing isn't very impressive considering some of the coins listed on there are...suspect to say the least.
iExec's volume is interesting to me. Yes it's low. That's why it's interesting given the facts about the project.

It is definitely "risky" to invest in something low volume, but with risk comes gains. I just fear LINK is out of its high-gain potential stage, especially given something like iExec RLC came along and made oracles + all of the other stuff it's capable of.

.... which means a small whale could literally 3-5x it at any point..... which means its most likely one announcement from a serious moon mission

I'm almost loading a mini-stack of RLC but first i have to know: is the team still active? they actually are coding or just spending ICO funds like REQ team is doing?

I really don't trust anything that comes from France

This is another thing. I don't think LINK will easily be able to 3-5x off of a single announcement or within a short period of time because of the marketcap. It's going to be a very slow burn if it continues going up. Potential gains are quite low from this point on.

I think iExec could 10x in a week multiple times over off of a crazy announcement like Google or Coinbase and you would still have time to go back to LINK if you really believed in LINK over RLC.

Crazy active. About as active as ive seen seen i started investing in the space. Consistently delivering ahead of schedule on their road map

>is the team still active?
Very active. Probably one of the most active teams in crypto. They update their github consistently.
>they actually are coding or just spending ICO funds like REQ team is doing
They haven't touched the ICO funds for anything except reinvesting back into iExec. The team released an article stating they would liquidate 100k ETH to keep RLC alive if they had to. That's how much they believe in it.

RLC is very different from REQ. In both use cases and teams.

green id or numbers and i swing all my link to rlc

Congrats on your insane gains.
How many RLC are you gonna buy? I want to watch the order pop up

>bought at the top again

EVERY TIME

Attached: 1560036360915.jpg (240x250, 4K)

Damn fren, money green

Buy le baguette up to 10$ sirs. Dr. Ranjeet Comfyer coming soon

If you're talking about LINK...yeah maybe. RLC is pretty much near the bottom if I've ever seen a bottom.

Some charts don't have a bottom

RLC
i just buy 100 of ever coin shilled until something moons
a smart investor i am not

RLC is literally REQ tier.

I think it's relative to the perceived value and potential use cases/potential adoption.
From my 5 years in crypto, I've seen many bottoms. This looks like a very good spot to buy RLC.

iExec really has no real competitors from what I can see. They are very far ahead. The reason why it's dropping is unknown, but the iExec team has alluded to thinking it's whale manipulation, which is bullish as fuck. I think RLC might 3x randomly quite soon.

I wouldn't worry about small 10% swings in the short term. RLC's long value is extremely high.
Not from my research and understanding. REQ is "paypal 2.0" and RLC is "cloud computing 2.0". Big difference.

Does anybody actually hold RLC?

The team released an article stating they would liquidate 100k ETH to keep RLC alive

Can you elaborate on that where can I find the article

Sorry I should rephrase, they "alluded" to liquidating a huge amount of their ETH to fight manipulation. It's incredibly bullish, IMO.

medium.com/iex-ec/rlc-token-state-of-the-exchanges-a2554a242d42

It's a very good read, too.

With 75% trading volume exclusive to Binance, is the RLC team working to get listed on other exchanges? Come September, when us burgers are blocked from Binance, we would face liquidity issues.

Yep. While it's not 100% certain that binance will not allow burgers to trade RLC, Gilles has said that they are working on getting it back on US exchanges and is the number 1 priority.

It's also on DEX's and shit. Nonetheless I have a lot of faith in this team to get it back for burgers.

DOS Netowrk is a better oracle provider solution and its mkt cap is:

listen closely

..ahem..

1,5 mill

thats the real moonshot everyone should be going for but they are too lazy to go to the exchanges that trade it. by the time poorfags catch on this it will be 30x now and hitting major xchanges (they just got approved to swap from ERC-20 to binance chain)

Attached: DOS-logo.png (554x522, 16K)

I just saw the medium article you provided just after I posted. Good read and shows the team is tackling the issue. Thx user

I'm going to tell you a few simple reasons why I won't take a risk with this coin.
>Incredibly new/untested/literal who team
>Extremely underdeveloped in comparison to iExec, will get eaten alive
>All asian team (high chance for asian exit scam)
>basically copying iExec and not providing a better product

Any time dude. Make sure you buy soon. It looks like it might take off.

>Dev funds have moved within the past 24 hours, to Binance
its actually true lol

a dev directly dumped 800k link on binance 8hrs ago
an easy $2.5m

link is actually reqtier
a neat idea thats actually just complicated ethereum middleware
theres actually tech behind iexec thats based on grid computing

>oracle provider
oracle just means API requester/parser. in chainlinks/others case its their entire business model. in iexecs case its just a dapp. golem is building their own oracles too. its nothing special techwise...

>based on grid computing
Yeah, I didn't want to go into super-specific details. iExec fog computing is going to be the gamechanger.

Also, very funny how LINK is only doing oracles and other coins are doing oracles + a million other applications. I think LINK is way overvalued, and is only this value because of the coinbase/google thing.

The site says you spend rlc to access iexecs resources or rent computing power. Could you give me a couple real use cases that I (or somebody) would need iexecs resources. What would I be trying to accomplish that I (or a business) needed to use iexec or rent computing power?

Lets take EDF + iExec partnership for example.
>EDF reportedly stands to benefit from increased network resilience, performance, and transparency by choosing to work using the blockchain solution provided by iExec.

Lets take it a step further in saying that they could also eventually use an iExec powered AI to solve for extremely complicated data-driven issues as well as having instant access to an extremely powerful, secure, and cheap alternative to setting up an entire GPU farm + team of scientists to run the tests. Imagine having the opportunity to utilize a huge secure farm of GPUs for extremely cheap vs having to set up your own farm(huge upfront costs) or use a centralized one that is prone to many issues like security and tampering.

This is just one example of many potential use cases of iExec...This is like investing in a new technology the world has never seen before. We've literally never been able to do this before. It's just going to take a few years for the world to catch up.

Maybe selling energy is weird to me because I'm American and don't get to chose who I pay for gas electric and other shit like that. But I think what you're saying is that power company may want to do... something (I still don't know what the hell they would need a gpu farm for if they just give people cheaper gas) but let's say they need some massive computing power, they could rent the actual hardware without needing the hardware in terms of processing power from iexec?

I just need to know what any individual or company would need huge gpu farms for. What specific data needs that much processing? I want to dig this cloud computing idea but what application needs you farms for cheap and short periods of time?

It's not really "selling energy". It's more "buying computations" ala carte.

>I still don't know what the hell they would need a gpu farm for
They would use the GPU farm to run a ton of tests to further optimize their systems and such. Better optimized = more potential profits.

>they could rent the actual hardware without needing the hardware in terms of processing power from iexec?
Essentially, that is what iExec is. It's "hardware on demand" for companies that need instant access to massive CPU/GPU farms. For whatever reasons. Also for datasets, AI, dApps, and other shit. It's extremely secure, verifiable, transparent, and cheap.

>I just need to know what any individual or company would need huge gpu farms for.
For running massive data-set oriented tests, running AI to help optimize their businesses, using GPU farms to run physics tests, and whatever computational-heavy thing they need.

>french
no thanks

>10x in a week multiple times over off of a crazy announcement like Google or Coinbase
hey pal you new here?

Doing one thing really well to become a standard is not a meme

Its 1.5 million market cap...

$100 now could net $100k given a $100,000,000 market cap

you really dont want to risk $100 kek

The trick?
Already have things developed ahead of time before putting it on roadmap. So it seems like they're productive on something that probably didn't take them too long.

I work for a university and we have a GPU farm in our datacenter for shit like protein sequencing.

The one that's currently being endorsed by nearly a hundred different shitcoins, Google, Oracle, Salesforce, Docusign, has been mentioned in a book about the 4th industrial revolution, and has one of the most solid team of advisors backing it than any other in crypto. I'm not a big enough fan of DBZ to be fooled by iExec's medium article begging for attention.

No.
What if I told you LINK doesn't do oracles "really well" in comparison to RLC? What if I told you LINK wasn't even the first to do decentralized oracles?

Yeah, I get it. Give a tiny amount of money and pray to the sky it reaches 100M. I foresee that team exit scamming after realizing the scope of the teams they plan to take on.

>LINK wasn't even the first to do decentralized oracles

LYFT wasnt the first rideshare service and look at it now. UBER is SHIT

Both teams have incredible partnerships/collabs.
The big difference is the marketcaps + potential.
I think iExec has more room to run in these areas. LINK has exhausted a lot of potential and has a big marketcap because of it. Meanwhile, iExec has so much more, especially when you consider the additional scope of what iExec is capable of. LINK might have some more room to run based on hype, but don't ignore RLC...unless you hate money.

Watch this video and understand why iExec might be used in some step of the way towards the world becoming autonomous and futuristic.

youtube.com/watch?v=aR5N2Jl8k14

Okay this sounds good. What exchange do I get it?

And what are they doing to get clients other than post medium articles with buzzfeed tier gifs? Are they actually going out and making connections with companies or just sending shills like you out to try and pump the price?

Binance.
They're definitely making connections. They are partnered with many multibillion dollar companies. When this tech gets slightly more mature it's going to take off in the singularity event. v4 and v5 are less than a year away. v4 is in december and v5 will be ~6 months after. Who knows what partnerships they will have by then.

Read about v5 and you'll start to see the picture more.

>does three things. Maybe more. Who knows?
>does one thing well.

Nigga plz

To add, iExec is also capable of AI and robotics. Realize that with everything else we know about today's world.
Do you understand how fucking much money is involved in AI?
It's actually insane that no one talks about this. AI is going to be the vehicle that rapidly changes our world for the better.

Imagine being a company that doesn't utilize AI vs the ones that do.
You would get BTFO before you knew it.

Those companies could be using iExec for almost no real upfront costs.
Then imagine the norman using iExec AI services to start businesses, create inventions, or whatever imaginable...and that's just AI. It does so much more. That's why I'm betting on iExec to have insane gains vs LINK, especially given the info in the OP.

See you have it wrong.
>does one thing well
>does one thing well + an infinite amount of other potential usecases + isn't at risk of a dev-exit scam because the team doesn't own 65% of the coins

>muh exit scam
People say bsv can do all this shit too. Why not buy some of that?

I really don't think bsv can do everything iExec can do. When someone can ask a robot for a task and have it verified then I'll be worried. I'm not sure if you've done a lot of research on iExec but consider doing it to understand the massive scope of possibilities.

Yeah, this is sounding more and more sweet.
Though this is probably a good question. People have been digging bsv.

So with robots (a thing I have looked into a lot as I'm in the food industry equipping new restaurants and installing the shit) and robotics is going to change the game fucking fast. My boss won't listen even when I bring him news and data and all that shit. If iexec can be rented for robots with any use it's a no fucking brainier.

Damn this is a sad thread done by a nolinker, if you had any insight you would know why link is better

>They are partnered with many multibillion dollar companies.
Name them.

Alibaba ibm Intel Ubisoft EDF TFCloud

It's very sweet when you begin to understand. It's very awesome to me that people still haven't caught on yet as it gives me ample time to get my positions. Billionaires aren't made overnight(mostly).

Like I said, I don't see BSV doing what iExec is doing. iExec is very focused on computing.

I could talk about robotics and AI forever. Love the hypothetical applications.

>If iexec can be rented for robots with any use it's a no fucking brainier.

This is definitely a future I see. Decentralized rentable robots/AI and also autonomously ran AI/robots for a plethora of things. Cleaning bots, truck driver bots, delivery bots, food bots, programmer bots, etc.

What if we eventually have decentralized corporations?
Where does this shit really end?

>REQ is "paypal 2.0"
Lurk more newfag

Yep, these are the main ones. I'm sure there's other very big companies. I mean, the French government even endorsed them.

medium.com/iex-ec/iexec-selected-as-a-winner-of-the-investment-for-the-future-programme-by-bpi-a-french-public-45d486d317fd

Attached: 155367321204.jpg (2000x1372, 237K)

This version chasing stuff is a massive red flag. And anything that claims to do more than one thing. Soz I was just trolling before, but thanks for the sincere replies.
T. All in link

Fuck you Gilles

Listen, I'm sorry you lost your money or are holding bags. I get it. I've been there a few times. Who knows though, maybe REQ will eventually be worth billions. Anything can happen.
>implying it isn't marketed as paypal 2.0
It's pretty obvious my dude...

I'm convinced. I'm gonna buy an 86k stack

It's not version chasing. Every version is significantly updated, and the first 2 versions didn't really matter and were more of development milestones.

V4 and V5 are the versions you should be looking at.

>And anything that claims to do more than one thing
What do you mean by this? iExec is capable of a shit-ton of things. It's all been shown...

Doing lots of different things just suggests to me that they don't know what problem they're trying to solve.

Lmao REQ is a fucking baguette scam dumpster fire.
But of course the frog marketing company you work for shills them too
>muh paypal 2.0
KEK

They're solving the centralized computing problem. They're solving the centralized robotics problem(imagine a world of only centralized robots, would be bad vs decentralized). They're solving the data-set-monetization problem. They're solving the oracle problem.

Oh wait, they already solved them. It quite literally already exists, it just hasn't been adopted yet because the world is a lagging piece of shit with 400ms ping.

That whole "they don't know what they're doing so they do everything" stance is a huge cop-out excuse and straight ignorance. Everything is not zero-sum.

Post proof.

Is it a scam? Idk, I just always saw it as paypal 2.0 and never cared much about it because isn't bitcoin basically just paypal 2.0: decentralized boogaloo anyways so who gives a fuck about them. Comparing them to RLC is stupid unless you're just fudding then whatever.

I had a stack of RLC that I sold once the Google pump hit link and I ride it in time for nice gains. I've been thinking of buying back into RLC again.
Would it be a good idea to hold both link and RLC or stupid?

Attached: 1556697576095.jpg (640x775, 67K)

You can solve every problems in this world if you don’t pay for expensive listing, useless bounty program, hyping every useless new your product won’t be interesting from a speculative perspective

Yes you fuck

>alibaba+intel + google cloud bonus potential partnership soon?
medium.com/iex-ec/iexec-moves-forward-collaboration-with-intel-and-alibaba-cloud-at-rsa-conference-2019-ccc1f119f2ae

IBM
>ibm.com/cloud/blog/iexec-integrates-ibm-cloud-to-increase-the-security-of-decentralized-computing

dont feel like linking the others it's all googleable

How much are they paying you for this?

I think it's good. They hedge pretty well against eachother.
Was that English? Jesus. If you don't think iExec is at the very least interesting from a speculative perspective you have a low IQ.
Okay well that sucks but it doesn't have anything to do with iExec besides being French. That's like not buying NEO at it's ATL because it's chinese and the chinese are known scammers...It's dumb.

I'm invested into iExec after doing extensive research on everything I need to know. Increasing awareness is really the goal, as most people don't even know about iExec let alone understand what it is... It'll help a bunch of people get rich as well as potentially increase the speed at which the tech is utilized. Maybe someone important sees this message, who knows.

I'm also bored and having fun informing people/having discussions about robotics/AI

Ultimately if iexec succeeds they would be easily a top 5 coin, and it's really crazy to have in the top 5 a project led by a bunch of French literal whos. THIS is what is keeping people off.

Sounds good. How many RLC for a suicide stack? I just know I need 1k minimum to not get deleted by the AI.

Look, if you ask literally anyone who knows me you will hear that I hate the French as a people. Going back to ancient days I hate them. But the chance hear is great.
Do you chart?

>Ultimately if iexec succeeds they would be easily a top 5 coin
I know.
>a bunch of French literal whos
Look the team up...literal gods of grid computing. Gilles has written books on the stuff. If the people are keeping you off I'd like to see the type of people you invest in instead...
5-10k is a good suicide stack. 25k+ is making it within 3 years

>hear
>here
>the chance here....
Im phonefagging.

Checked when you guys say xK stack are you talking #tokens or $

>If the people are keeping you off I'd like to see the type of people you invest in instead...
Ethereum mostly. And yeah this is not looking good for me but I also bought a LINK suicide stack back in the days and I'm happy I did.

Do I chart? As in do TA on RLC? I have before, yes, and it went okay. I know a bit about TA, but I don't do short term more medium-long. I think this is the last dip before it takes off. It could take another month or 2 though but it also might not.(because v4 comes out in Dec.)