User, let's talk about this

if I should die
in my sleep
i pray that creg
my Bitcorn keep

'b-but just one issue..'
the Law demands
'the fug did you sign this..
..in Comic Sans ?'

eh ? eh ?

>autistic
if you mean getting thrown out of events regularly is a testimony to autism maybe
>likes japan
that's just weird
>paranoid about the government
he is very strongly and vocally pro government an regulation
>well educated
meme degrees from a degree factory
>background in cryptography and security
nothing of substance
>holds an eternal grudge against having to pay taxes one time
he was awfully keen on paying taxes on his bitcoin he bagged the ato about that for years (they didn't even knew what the shit is then he took them to the shed and claimed $50 mil tax returns on imaginary btc)

lurk moar faggit!

>The trust will be accessible by two of five keys
How does this relate to the "blind trust" with "Shamir's secret sharing" which supposedly contains 7 parts?

>If I should die, Dr Wright will be returned shares in the Tulip trust and company 15 months after my death
But Dave is like... already dead

it doesn't like at all. at the supposed time there were no multisig wallets either.

The funniest part is that craig says he can't access the trust to show what's in it even though his wife is a trustee and he admitted that he has spent money from the trust

Attached: giphy.gif (337x263, 3.96M)

>Dave.. he's dead
shhh.. let sleeping plotholes rip. Start pulling on one of those, all your teeth will fall out

he will just make up any lie to his convenience at the moment. trust never existed. i bet he got some btc stuck in gox tho.

That was my thoughts too. He's probably waiting for those funds from MTGox to be released and he'll claim it was the Tulip Trust coins.

From what I could tell though, he isn't denying that he owes Ira. It'll be funny if he gets hit with a theft charge also. That would drag his wife into it for being a "trustee" possibly

Based and stanzapilled

No multisig wallets doesn't mean the inventors couldn't create an m of n tx.

buy btc sv now.

it will 10x+ soon once craig is on tv being shown as the creator of the thing facebook is making popular

>n-nothing of substance
stay poor
>giac.org/certified-professional/craig-wright/107335

Actually makes sense. Still, this little plan probably won't end well in court

there are docs concerning the trust
>inb4 forged

Nothing proving that they were created before 2014 though and no proof of what's in them. My point still stands.

Attached: 2011.jpg (692x209, 23K)

Yeah, that's the funny part. Because everything involving the "trust" is absolutely ridiculous. The addresses, the trustees, the explanation, everything.

talk about a forged email?
come on son, smarten up will you.

youtube.com/watch?v=QFBHkkg2s2w
/t

Aussie man bad

Attached: 1561881562255.jpg (768x663, 64K)

The "trustees".

Attached: le trust.png (620x619, 152K)

Muh vietnamese prostitute.

giac.org/certified-professional/uyen-nguyen/130715

Attached: 1561853725328.jpg (821x926, 73K)

Attached: u.png (629x212, 30K)

It's not a document concerning the trust itself. It's a document with an offshore company (after which, apparently, the "trust" has been named). But there is no connection to the "trust" in your pic.

And.....

Attached: 1561978381020.gif (480x480, 2.89M)

He'd have contacted her if it was the person from your link.

Attached: 1553553236312.png (900x1070, 131K)

Not necessarily.
It is the same person though. yours.org/content/-previously-unpublished-_unwriter-theory--not-sure-if-i-should-share-t-5f0c6ffd7ddc

No one knows what person it is, or if she is even real. Does the list of the "trusties" not seem suspicious to you?

>But Dave is like... already dead
So his share is now CSW's in the trust and it's like... almost time to open

If you idiots can't see BSV mooning before the end of this year before Craig drops bitcoin to zero and pays off all BSV devs and holders then you should retreat into your mother's womb with such intelligence

Okay, good luck getting access to those coins that he looked up on the blockchain explorer and crashing the market with his imagination.

Nah mate, the key they need 2/5 parts is for seeding the 'algorithmic' private key generator of ALL the mining wallets, not for transactions themselves
Where has your brain gone?
Muh unwriter

This is for you
>Where has your brain gone
Why you hanging round this thread anyway, worried your shitcoins gonna lose value? Protip: Segwit goes to ZERO

Attached: 18E1E6B0-1748-4968-9419-2D59014081C8.png (576x325, 103K)

nice try faggot

So... What are you going to do when you eventually realize that the whole thing is bogus, the man has been lying to you?

it won't, all he needs is 1 more key segment from either miss nguyen or dave's failsafe delivery
if she comes out from hiding, it's over

What if, purely hypothetically, Dr Craig Wright lied about the trust, there were no keys, no coins, no "courier", Nguyen (a common Vietnamese name btw) was either an unrelated or a non-existing person? Just curious what your reaction would be.

why even ask that silly question when she is obviously a real person and there are obviously trusts because two people are in court arguing over them

What. If. Would you still trust CSW again or accept it as part of the game?

not looking good for Craig, get out of BSV while you still can because soon it's going to 0

i'm just going to bed because it's just a waste of time talking with you people

he has a low insignificant amount of coins there

that's not how coins work tho
Craig can go to jail and BSV would still not move
the problem for BSV's price is correlated to volume, hashrate and BTC price action

FUCK YOU!

twitter.com/stephendpalley/status/1146519811716997125

Might be game over for Satoj. Anons dispute this please.

Attached: 1534311872552.jpg (663x485, 28K)

they can't
IT'S FUCKING OVER
they need to get rid of their bags ASAP

why are you mad at me
BSV might be a shitcoin but even when ETC got 51% attacked the price didn't move
BSV won't move price because of Craig and his hoax, most trading done on BSV is wash trading, Calvin sells the coins to himself.

Ahahahahahahahahaha bye bye bsvfaggots

also

does anyone have the public key for Kleiman's GPG? searching for that on google is impossible now because Greg Wright comes up 200% of the time now since he can't stop pathologically lying about his dead acquaintance

that document signed with the GPG is meaning less if the public key wasn't broadcasted as much as possible

oof
we all know creg isnt telling the whole truth
the question is what % is lies, and more importantly, will he actually get 1 million BTC to dump next year

>Craig can go to jail and BSV would still not move

Attached: laughing.jpg (480x360, 22K)

>will he actually get 1 million BTC to dump next year
no

I could be wrong
I believe that because Calvin probably holds like 90% of the BSV coins while washtrading them

oh fuck this is good, BSV fags BTFO

Hmm?

courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.237.14.pdf

Nothing about coins, bitcoin, crypto and trusts.

Further the line: "Dr Wright MAY request a loan of Bitcoin for the following reasons (and no others)"....and then he proceeds to list to reasons which are literally so broad that nearly any request could fit...."research" and "increase commercial activities".....I had to buy that lambo as it was increasing adoption in high-end vehicle market.

this document was written by a brainlet and no reasonable person would've agreed to it.

ITT loser twitteratti bout to get RKD

youtube.com/watch?v=cyQUHhbzMmI

Attached: 1557720480600.gif (382x308, 1.47M)

Dave died in 2013. Both of those dates make no sense.

Also these documents are being submitted by the plaintiffs not craig.

I am one of those you moron. It means nothing.

I have it on good authority that the psuedonymous BSV supporter named @urbanarson is part of the group called Unwriter.

Do with this information what you will.

Attached: Unwriter.jpg (1440x1213, 611K)

>fapfapfap

They're complete horse shit

>faketoshi supporters
Fucking flags when

Hmm?
He never had those coins?
What will you say when he doesn't dump next year too?

so you're telling me that this person is part of the group responsible for making a weather and calendar app ?

teams of meteorologists and astrologists to bring you the most accurate data to your blockchain

Attached: D-lKm_wU4AA92eV.jpg (940x1199, 106K)

he had 40k btc at the height he must have a lot less now. but there is almost always a tiny tiny kernel of unrecognizable truth in his lies. so he may get some btc in 2020.

putting weather data on blockchain is the most ridiculously useless thing to do with a blockchain since there are thousands of independent sources for weather data and very well distributed it's one of the most naturally tamper resistant data in human history.

not only that, but also almost noone is interested in past weather data we only care about actual and forecast. and forecast is never immutable.

it's excellent dead weight if you just want to purposefully bloat your chain tho.

are you retarded? if the coins on p2pkh addresses first need to be spent to a p2sh address. that would be seen on the blockchain. if you would withhold that transaction the other parties expose themselves to trivial double spend.

Craig had a share and David had a share, when David died his share of the tulip trust went to Craig, he didn't get the coins early

this entire thing doesn't make sense. tell me one good reason why would they do this supposed scheme? why would anyone go along with it?

let's say i got a bitcoin private key with 50 btc... i split the pk with shamirs in a 2 of 3 manner for simplicity's sake. you get one key i get one key and a trustee gets one key, and i ask for $250k (half of what it's worth) loan on this as collateral and if i don't pay it back with interest in a year the trustee gives you the keys but if i do i get the btc back...

do you go along with it? do you think this is a good deal for you? you can get btc at half price... possibly fraction of the price inn a year. or your money back with 10% interest. what could go wrong?

Attached: CraigIsAFraud.png (1262x1146, 132K)

Attached: ScammingCockroach.png (1528x1112, 230K)

alright let me help you what could go wrong...
1) i never actually destroyed the pk as i have countless backups naturally
2) your shamir key part is not a real part it doesn't do anything i kept the actual part and you have no way to verify this unless you have 2 parts
3) the trustee colludes with me (because she is my wife) and you get screwed over and never see your money back
4) you die and basically just gave me $250k and i will deny this nonsense to ever happened or make a btc transaction at the moment of your death and claim it was to the address you specified (it's mine of course) and tell your family they need to search for the private key and you can sue all you want you can't ever prove anything.

and that's just the most obvious way i'm sure i could come up with a few more to screw you over with this retarded scheme.

a proper multisig solution with a trustee that can actually be trusted (because he is a public figure / organization for one and it's pocket money for him on the other) my ability to screw you over is almost nonexistent. anyone involved in cryptography know this intimately well.

>tell me one good reason why would they do this supposed scheme? why would anyone go along with it?

At the time Craig was dealing with a rogue tax agent at the ATO, he was afraid that all his bitcoin would be seized by the Australian government, they had all ready raided his properties looking for keys

>let's say i got a bitcoin private key with 50 btc... i split the pk with shamirs in a 2 of 3 manner for simplicity's sake. you get one key i get one key and a trustee gets one key, and i ask for $250k (half of what it's worth) loan on this as collateral and if i don't pay it back with interest in a year the trustee gives you the keys but if i do i get the btc back...

The coins always belong to you, don't take the word "loan" literally, it just means borrowing some keys early for necessary research and expenses if the other trustees agree

>user, let's talk about this...
Lets not, Those coins are inaccessible...

i mean dave... why would dave go along with it? assuming he was actually a computer science guy adept n cryptography? in this example i'm craig and you are dave. loan is just to make it more lifelike and have it financial impact on you.

>had all ready raided his properties
in 2015... you are murking up the timeline dave died in 2013

Woah....that is a big one here. How no one commented on THIS ???

own pre-aged thread -