Who else here /lose a grand or 2 everytime they refresh delta/? Amazing how consistently link can dump hour after hour...

imagine your internet money climbing above 200k and not putting the bulk of it into real money before it crashes

>real money
>fiat

lmaooooooo fucking retard

Slow bleeds are the best bleeds. If you're not holding and just watching that is.

i told everyone to sell at $4, it wasn't even the very top, i'll be buying back in at 2

>real money
kek

Take some profit while it's still above $3, it's not going to dump to stupid levels but don't get creamed cause of a HODL meme. Buy back in lower, take some profits

>fiat
>ever

200k? the level of links hes holding is easily $20 million in the next couple years

people are realizing that the pseudo partnerships are weak as fuck and no one is using LINK, so they're dumping a $4 Bil marketcap coin with 0 users

One cent every few minutes to be exact.

if fiat is so worthless, why is link's value measured in it and not the other way around? :^)

No, it's shit for bobos too. I've been watching the screen for two days waiting for the next collapse, and it's coming way too slow for me to buy in.

I lost 700k in 2018 and I'm broke outside of crypto. You THINK you'll kys, but when push comes to shove you pussy out.

It's been like a week since Google/Oracle, dilate

>pseudo partnerships
To Google Cloud, a "partner" is a paying sponsor or media outlet.
Just look up "google cloud become a partner".

What Google Cloud did with Chainlink is MUCH more valuable than that: integration.

Already cashed put 70k dude, i literally do not need this money until its 7 figs. Wtf am i going to do with 250k? Buy a nice house to wage slave in until I die? Ive cashed all i need, im either retiring in the next 2 years or wage slaving the rest of my life.

anyone who knows programming knows it's not an integration. BigQuery already integrates with literally any program. It's a REST API. There's no "integration". Programs don't need to "integrate" with BigQuery, they already work with each other out of the box.

It is 100% a pseudo, weak ass collaboration with the only purpose on Google's side to promote BigQuery.

Now kill yourself you fucking retarded brainlet. Learn some programming.

>anyone who knows programming knows it's not an integration.
WHOOPS

Attached: google cloud chainlink.png (1600x767, 145K)

>the only purpose on Google's side to promote BigQuery.
BigQuery is Google's big data powerhouse.

If what you say is true, and Google was "just" using Chainlink to promote BigQuery, it would possibly be even more bullish than integration.

like I said, anyone who knows programming understands it's not an integration. This picture does not represent an integration. It represents BigQuery working like it would out of the box with literally anyone's program they made out of their basement.

LEARN SOME PROGRAMMING YOU FUCKING BRAINLET. You're an embarrassment to the human race.

Keep posting new shit btw, I will keep BTFO everything you say and make everyone who reads this thread dump.

>This picture does not represent an integration.
Except it literally shows a Chainlink node under Google Cloud.

If you think some small marketing department at Google mentioning Chainlink in an attempt to promote their own products is worth $4bil marketcap, then you don't know much about economics

>some small marketing department at Google
WHOOPS

Attached: google cloud chainlink tweet.png (744x874, 258K)

> imagine thinking google has to mention chainlink to promote their own product

you might actually be retarded

KEK. Learn some programming brainlet.

It represents a paying customer of Google Cloud, running a node on a Server they pay Google for (App Engine). Literally not an integration. Anyone can spin up an App Engine server in 2 seconds. it's a public service.

Like I said, these weak ass partnerships are only fooling low IQ retards like you. Any programmer sees right through this and would never use Chainlink

Are you tired of getting BTFO yet?

Read the other blogs, they literally make a new blog post every day about different use cases of Google Cloud and they mention literally whos like Chainlink constantly.

Soo if stadia becomes a thing, link will moon?

All lols set aside, they have a bright future if they get their shit together

Google has 100k employees. There's definitely less than 5 people that looked at the blog post before it was released. It is a small department.

Like I said, it's WEAK ASS pseudo partnerships to fool non programmers who don't even know what google cloud is

Dude we warned you yesterday. The devs moved 1.7 mill in binance. See you at 1$

Lmfao bro you are doing gods work

Scroll through here: twitter.com/gcpcloud?lang=en

I have yet to see a single Chainlink-like third party.

what did I just read

Attached: 1562126233722.jpg (660x495, 90K)

>It represents a paying customer of Google Cloud
No, it literally represents a Chainlink node under Google Cloud.

In the post they also literally refer to Google Cloud's Chainlink testnet node as "OUR documentation for requesting data from BigQuery via Chainlink".

Attached: google cloud link testnet bigquery.png (1045x1091, 174K)

>It is a small department.
Except Google Cloud OFFICIALLY broadcast that blogpost.
Cope more, harder, and further.

No it does not.

It represents a paying customer using App Engine (fancy word for their hosting services) to serve a Chainlink node.

YOU DONT KNOW WHAT GOOGLE CLOUD IS. You're not a fucking programmer. You don't know shit. I use Google Cloud daily. I literally spend about $5k/y on Google cloud to run my apps

Like I said, you're a fucking deluded brainlet, and I don't really care what you think. Chainlink is dependent on programmers like me using their software, and I know that no one will, cause it's centralized vaporware, and these marketing articles are made to fool investors, not us.

Nigger they literally tweet 5 posts a day with marketing articles about their own services. Chainlink and Ethereum was just a nice clickbait "Blockchain + BigQuery" post.

There is not much text on there, you should be able to read it.
It literally shows a Chainlink node under Google Cloud.

Plus, Google Cloud refers to the Google Cloud testnet node as "OUR documentation for requesting data from BigQuery via Chainlink".
Literally saying that the Google Cloud testnet node is theirs.

>Nigger they literally tweet 5 posts a day with marketing articles about their own services.
Obviously lol.
But they do not mention parties like Chainlink very often. It's a big deal.

>Chainlink and Ethereum was just a nice clickbait "Blockchain + BigQuery" post.
If what you say is true, and Google was "just" using Chainlink to promote BigQuery, it would possibly be even more bullish than integration.

If you havent dumped your bags yet, go do it now. This coin is memed to death. You guys are retards.

Stop trying so hard to fud, You're embarrassing yourselves

Attached: images.jpg (225x225, 7K)

Hi me, it's you

buy signal

>250k is nothing
Pls dont fall for the extreme poles meme. ITS EITHER NOTHING OR EVERYTHING

its retarded when your yearly salary is 1/10th of your portfolio

250k is a lot of money, don't let Jow Forums convince you otherwise.

Buy a house and not have to worry about a mortgage for the next few decades? Check. Invest in some property or start a business? Check. Go and live in South America or SEAsia for a couple of decades? Check.

Never fucking selling

Fucking sucks, this month is going to be rough.
Hopefully August and September are better.

It used to be 5, you lost money.
>But i'm still up
You want to sell with 3000% profit or 200%?

more like 2500% or 2300%...

>imagine cashing out ethereum at 15$ because muh fiat

Attached: 1513549542778.png (399x404, 123K)

What's wrong bro, I thought you were never selling? When this shitcoin goes back to sub ICO levels you'll hate yourself for falling for that meme lol.

Was $3.27 the lowest USD value it got during the dump to 27k?

>he STILL falls for the market cap meme
sub 50 IQ confirmed

No you won’t, stop being a fucking retard.

There are two people who looked at that before it was posted. The person who wrote it and the PR person whose job it is to make sure everything complies with google’s PR guidelines. It was sent to probably 4 people total. Roughly 3 people (on googles side) worked on the integration: a product lead and 2 engineers.

So you’re correct about ~5 people being involved. Those 5 people being involved in this project cost Google somewhere in the ballpark of $100k-200k. That’s about what this post cost to make.

You guys fudding this need to stop being retarded and realize if you’re not along for the ride you’re going to be kicking yourselves VERY hard a year from now. This is just the beginning.

>t. Worked with google on several product integrations

if your never selling I don't know what the problem is? if LINK is going to 1000 losing todays cents is nothing. unless your swinging linkies, but their days always come.