John Wolpert bought link, we will all make it, nolinkers btfo'd again

John Wolpert bought link, we will all make it, nolinkers btfo'd again.

He's the cofounder of IBM blockchain if you didnt know

Attached: 2je316g.png (1440x1834, 208K)

ridiculously bullish news

STINKY

literally who

He's the cofounder of IBM blockchain if you didnt know

I'm a stinky but this is a literally who so gives a fuck faggot

dis

>IBM

wow is this the 90s? who the fuck cares

So a McAfee kinda guy who got lucky with a brand and now gets paid to shill coins?

He’s the cofounder of IBM blockchain but doesn’t know how to run an oracle?

>oracle rig

IBM has devolved into an R&D subsidiary.....

Hardly a big player nowadays.

I never thought I would see such cope

This kek

All this means is that Hyperledger (The only DLT that is being considered by businesses) is about to kill Bitcoin and all other legacy ledgers. That's it thanks for playing gamblers, casino is about to close

>He's the cofounder of IBM blockchain if you didnt know

>He's the cofounder of IBM blockchain
And of Hyperledger.

never ceases to amaze me how early Jow Forums found link. some freakishly autistic fags roam these streets

A lot of eyes were looking through a lot of ICOs for the next big moon, but somehow Jow Forums fixated on this one and hit the jackpot.
Pretty amazing.

not a coincidence, they got thrown a bone by somebody who likes them

Jow Forums fixated on everything. You don't understand how diligent some of Jow Forumss autists have been. There were people who made spreadsheets of hundreds of ICOs and went through every single one, ranked it by about 10 different criteria, and then gave it an overall score.
I haven't seen anyone put anything like that sort of effort in since 2017.

Thank Ian Balina

>Jow Forums fixated on everything.
Jow Forums didn't fixate on anything the way it fixated on Chainlink.

>You don't understand how diligent some of Jow Forumss autists have been. There were people who made spreadsheets of hundreds of ICOs and went through every single one, ranked it by about 10 different criteria, and then gave it an overall score.
That's what I meant by "a lot of eyes were looking through a lot of ICOs".

>I haven't seen anyone put anything like that sort of effort in since 2017.
Because the ICO craze has been over since early 2018.

>how to run a JSON parser

Are you trolling or just a brainlet?

I'm convinced a lot of the breadcrumbs and larps from 2017 and early 2018 were oblique hints from team members. It seemed like every time there was a two or three day lull in digging, somebody would post a lead that turned out to be a big deal.

Turns out Jow Forums were the "director of marketing" the whole time. The world's first decentralised career role.

We are early. Still.

Those were the golden age of link threads. Now all we have is moonboy nulinkers and shit flinging.

And paid entirely in Link gains.

>hints from team members
no

One day I want to have enough money to personally finance a manhunt for Assblaster to shake his hand

I still pick random weeks in the archive and read through them just to remember the feel. There were so many uninterrupted, based conversations in those threads. Anons sharing notes and helping eachother out, fudders designing fud so that it selected for smart curious people... What a time man.

Who then?

must be nice, tweeting out to have his followers buy his bags

Attached: girl throw.gif (400x295, 3.05M)

I think it's called modesty.

the same people that let Jow Forums know about eth in 2015

he probably bought at $4.50 and is tweeting so he can dump at break even

he bought for $300 bucks so I don't think he is in a rush to dump

Lol eth was one of the only few shitcoins back then, why would you need to let people know who are already interested in blockchain? Chainlink is one in a sea of shitcoins so here it would make sense

>eth was the only shitcoin
fucking 2017 crowd..

I said few you illiterate faggot

go away new fag, you baited me into spoon feeding you, good job, now kys

>I just call everybody newfag so i dont have to make a proper argument

A statement like
>eth was only one of a few shitcoins
disqualifies you entirely damn 2017 fag, go kys

Still no argument...
>muh semantics
It were a few compared to what we have now
Also your underaged edge is showing

There is no reason to feed you more. You disqualified yourself. There are still chains and platforms around that came before eth, some from as early as 2012 that are used, but I'm sure you know that old fag

You didn’t feed shit larper but whatever