That's why the price of Bitcoin failed to exceed the 2017 high price point. The big investors all know there's a Lawsuit on the horizon and that my claims about being the inventor of Bitcoin are true. Otherwise, the price of Bitcoin likely would've jumped up last year.
So you're larping as Satoshi too? That's sweet, I noticed that CSW get noticeably triggered by competing impersonators
Here's the screenshot where I threatened Craig Wright...
My posts is in the chat box to the right at the bottom. This was during a Live interview. It took place in October originally. The date has changed likely to hide the fact that the market crashed after I made the threat towards him.
Craig Wright is Satoshi. I'm the guy Satoshi got the idea for Bitcoin from in 2009. Satoshi LIED and claimed he invented Bitcoin in 2008. That's why Craig was caught editing blog posts from 2008 to make it appear he was working on Cryptoccurency.
Satoshi is basically the biggest fraud in the history of mankind. My name is David Leakey.
That's nice larp, anyway, come back when you manage to make CSW sperg out, otherwise it's just bunk
Nobody of sound mind believes craig is satoshi. Satoshi didn't steal your idea, he implemented Nick Szavbo's ideas after the financial crisis of 08 basically
>Ross Ulbricht got life in prison double life actually, all of which for matters Bitcoin unrelated. So, humor us - on what grounds, exactly, would you be suing creg ? And if he is Satoshi, why does he lie so much/cannot sign/etc ?
Will Nick sit down for a polygraph test?
I will gladly.
Due to the fact that he stole the idea...
That's why he edited blog posts from 2008 and got caught. People perceive that as evidence that he's not Satoshi, but when you realize that the idea for Bitcoin wasn't posted on the internet until 2009 then you can understand why Craig edited those posts...
Craig had to hide the fact that he got the idea from me in 2009....
I'm not saying Nick is Satoshi, I'm saying Satoshi just built off of what Nick Szabo already created, Bitgold
Yea, I'm telling you that's not true...
I know this for a fact because I'm the guy who came up with the idea for Cryptocurrency entirely on my own. There are A LOT of thieves involved in the scam. Including Nick.
This is the first time I've even heard Nick's name. As I said, will Nick sit down for polygraph? I will gladly.
>I will gladly Because you believe it yourself. It's called being delusional and it happens to everyone. >t. the man who actually invented the iPhone
OP, less talk, more action. If you're set on trolling/provoking CSW in one way or another, go for it.
Nigger, if he was Satoshi he would have come out in the open a long time ago. The real Satoshi is probably fucking dead, got hit by a truck or something.
No, it's because I was the one who came up with the idea for Cryptocurrency. Nobody else was involved.
Why would a guy come out as Satoshi when he stole the idea and there are people getting arrested for using Bitcoin?
I didn't come out as being the inventor either out of fear of getting arrested when I first heard about it in 2012. I can certainly understand why Craig wouldn't, either. Not just because he's a thief, but because of the risk of association with the creation of the asset.
You question why someone would remain silent when people use Bitcoin to buy Drugs, Guns, and Child Porn? It's common sense why someone would remain silent.
There were multiple "cryptocurrencies" before bitcoin with multiple creators.
I am taking action...
I exposed how my Legal Match listing is getting CENSORED. That's action. These posts will be shown in court someday.
I'm serious that I came up with the idea for the iPhone down to specific details. Nobody else was involved. It's just one of many ideas stolen from me by the Mossad through mind probing spy satellites.
There were claims of the existence of Cryptocurrencies, but let's see those guys sit down for a polygraph test...Bernie Madoff went to prison for far less than lying about the origin of an investment asset like Crypto...
These guys will piss their pants during a polygraph test.
>You question why someone would remain silent when people use Bitcoin to buy Drugs, Guns, and Child Porn? It's common sense why someone would remain silent. Yes I question, and no it's not. Obviously the creator doesn't have control on how people use their invention. A face would have actually attached legitimacy to concurrency.
>Obviously the creator doesn't have control on how people use their invention.
My perceptions, as well. BUT, you never know how the FBI will perceive things. It's smarter to remain silent as Craig and I did...
Now that Wall Street is invested I can begin suing people with the knowledge I won't be arrested for revealing myself.
>Invented crypto currency >Never heard of Nick Szabo You were somewhat convincing LARP until then
Sorry man. Nick is a fraud...
I hate to break it to you...It's not my opinion. It's a conclusive fact.
>these posts will be shown in court someday FUCK NIGGERS FUCK KIKES FUCK CHINKS FUCK SPICS AND MOST IMPORTANTLY FUCK JANNIES And Hitler did nothing wrong
MS-13 from El Salvador...The strong arming KILLERS of the Sinaloa Cartel.
You're saying exactly all the things an insane person would say and none of the things anyone who added anything to the development of cryptocurrency would. The cartels work for the Mossad btw, that's how they know the info gathered from the mind satellites.
drop some knowledge bombs on us then what was the relationship between CSW, hal finney, and david kleiman? do you know anything about the trust, if so is it legit and a threat to btc? what gave you the idea for btc and POW, and the solution for double spending?
I don't have a background in computer science. I simply came up with the idea for an independent encrypted digital currency with a limited number of Coins that increase in value as more money is invested into the asset. It was my idea to call them "Coins." It was also my idea to use Letters and Numbers in the Addresses. It was my idea to use temporary Addresses for each transaction and refrain from storing personal data with the transactions...
My idea was actually BETTER than Bitcoin/Cryptocurrency as you know it. My original idea was for users to input their own Addresses into the system and delete the Address when desired. Giving the owners of the Coins complete and total control. Whereas, these Wallets/Exchanges provide Coin users with the Addresses now. So, my idea was BETTER and LESS CENTRALIZED.
That's how you know I'm the inventor because when my idea is clearly superior you can see that Cryptocurrency as you know it is just a watered down and altered version of it.
You came up with nothing and don't understand how any of it works. The idea that any of that contributed to the development of crypto is a delusion you built to feed your ego and it's much more common than people think.
I created bitcoin
>It was also my idea to use Letters and Numbers in the Addresses This is so absurd it makes me think you're trolling but there are people out there even more delusional than this.
I came up with everything I just said...Even the Blockchain Ledger was my idea, but NOT in a Block structure. He suggested a Ledger to account for all the money invested in the system and make sure the value of the Coins was accurate.
That's basically the entire system. These guys added "Hash Cash Verification" and "Mining." The term "Hash Cash" is actually a reference to ME, as well. I was growing Weed in my apartment for a living when I invented Bitcoin. I have the criminal record to prove that. "Hash Cash" is a direct reference to how I made my money at the time. That's NOT a coincidence.
Why do you think they use the term "Key?" Look at my LAST NAME....LeaKEY. It's a reference to the inventor.
Numbers and Letters for Addresses was my idea AND I even suggested using SYMBOLS if necessary to make it harder to track. Which, doesn't appear to be the case. It was MY IDEA to call them "Addresses," because you can't call them "Account Numbers." Since you use letters in the Addresses.
It was MY IDEA to have a LIMITED NUMBER OF COINS that increase in value. Which, is what makes Crypto appealing to investors on top of the privacy aspect. NONE of these programmers invented a currency with a limited number of Coins that increase in value as more money is invested into the Coins. That was ALL MY IDEA and it's what makes Crypto appealing to investors.
hey asshole, do you want us to earthquake the world again? stop talking about bitcoin.
>I came up with everything I just said. Even if you did say those things to someone involved with creating Bitcoin you added nothing. >That's basically the entire system. You didn't describe any part of the system.
Yea, I just described the entire system from a User's standpoint. What you're referring to are the technical aspects of how the system functions. Which, makes the programmers partial inventors, but the LIMITED NUMBER OF COINS that increase in value was ENTIRELY my idea. NON of those programmers came up with that idea and it's what makes Cryptocurrency profitable from an investment standpoint.
I love boobs
Not to mention, the TEMPORARY ADDRESSES that change after every transaction was entirely MY IDEA, as well...
NON of the programmers came up with that idea. I'm not even sure the "encryption" aspect even guarantees privacy by itself. It's the aspect where Users don't have PERMANENT Addresses that guarantees privacy and that was MY IDEA.
holy boomer. whats your opinion on csw?
I wonder if his name even is Craig STEVEN Wright...
Almost as if he was copying my name...David STEVEN Leakey.
I posted the idea for Bitcoin on Godlike Productions in June of 2009. Everyone knows that place has Intelligence Agency connections. I'm sure EVERY post on their is reviewed by someone. So, THEY saw it. Craig Wright likely isn't even his name.
Dude what you are saying is like a 10 year old saying I came up with the word address and I have 5 dollars no one else gets any this is all there is in the world you a dumb fool
It's actually nothing like that, but thanks for posting.
It’s exactly what you are saying you offer zero proof you have zero technical knowledge you say you came up with address with numbers and letters and you offer zero proof ZERO ZERO NOTHING BE GONE
People say, "That's your fault for not programming it yourself."
I was 23 years old when I came up with the idea and had ZERO background in Computer Science, or Encryption. Had I kept the idea to myself and not posted it Cryptocurrency still wouldn't exist today even IF I went to school for Computer Science. These guys had 20 plus years experience in Coding and Encryption. That's what it would take to get it done properly. Not to mention, you need the connections in banking and finance to even deal with a software program like Bitcoin.
Posting the idea out in the open seemed like the most logical plan to make something happen with it.
This can kind of be called an idea unlike the other non ideas but it's completely irrelevant to what separates Bitcoin from earlier digital assets and it didn't catch on. I have a much better case for my iPhone claim I only need a tiny sample of any of your writing to say with 90% certainty that you're completely insane. It's a talent I acquired from reading stuff like timecube. Are you (((diagnosed))) as a paranoid schizophrenic?
The LARP is getting real old. About time someone easily debunked him.
Nick Szabo has never written a line of code in his life LOL
wtf this is just over?
Yea, the date on that White Paper is a LIE.
The dates on the Genesis block are a LIE, as well. Dates on articles and shown within software programs are easy to falsify. Just display a fake date on the document and change the date settings within the software to reflect an earlier date.
The author of the White Paper (Craig Wright) has already been caught falsifying blog posts from 2008. So, that indicates that the date on the White Paper as well as the Genesis block are indeed fabricated dates. If the author of the White Paper edited blog posts dishonestly, then it's logical to assume he did the same with the White Paper and the first blocks.
Sorry, but Satoshi was already caught editing blog posts and the dates on the White Paper and Genesis block are in doubt now because of it.
So he stole the idea and built it? Then how are you relevant when you don't hold any coins?
Posting a bunch of articles isn't conclusive proof of anything.
You need WITNESSES. I can go write a document with a fake date from the 70's right now. Would that be proof that I invented Bitcoin? No, it wouldn't and none of these documents you guys keep linking to are proof, either.
In order to get WITNESSES you need to be on a PUBLIC FORUM. Which, is where my posts presenting the idea for Bitcoin were posted. Not on some back channel IRC chat, or in a document with a FAKE date on it.
The first DOCUMENTED date that's irrefutable that a Cryptocurrency existed is November 22nd, 2009. 5 months AFTER I presented the idea for it. That was the date that bitcointalk.org went online and the Bitcoin software was first presented to people outside of the circle of thieves. They can't LIE about that date because people posting on bitcointalk.org aren't a part of the SCAM.
Get the point?
Crypto never existed conclusively until November 22nd, 2009. The first Exchange didn't even open up until March 17th, 2010. Why would Satoshi wait until November 22nd, 2009 to make bitcointalk.org and March 17th, 2010 to put Bitcoin on an Exchange if it was operational in January of 2009? IT MAKES NO SENSE until you realize that Satoshi didn't get the idea for Bitcoin until I gave it to him in June of 2009.
These 2 dates EXPOSE the LIE....
November 22nd, 2009...bitcointalk.org went online
March 17th, 2010...Bitcoin was available for purchase on the first EXCHANGE... You fuckin Satoshi need to get it through your head. I (David Leakey) am the inventor of Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency.
>You fuckin Satoshi fanboys need to get it through your head. I (David Leakey) am the inventor of Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency.
>>Paul Le Roux >Again, are ANY of these guys getting Death Threats from Drug Cartels for inventing Cryptocurrency??? LMAO this is probably the most clueless statement I have ever read. Just from this alone, you're already discredited in my eyes. Because I doubt a true cypherpunk that was already around in the early days would not know Paul Le Roux. Or even make such as statement about him.
Not only did he create TrueCrypt, but he was also a criminal cartel boss. He was involved in gold smuggling, drug shipments, and arms trafficking across multiple countries. As well as multiple assassinations admitted in court, such as the assassination of Dave Smith, and confirmed by multiple witnesses, such as elite ex-military with multiple honors Joseph Hunter, who was his top hitman.
And he is involved even in heavy-hitting cases like Iran arms deals and Somali arms and drug deals.
This guy probably eats death threats for breakfast, not just from multiple cartels but probably even from 3-letter agencies. His Wikipedia article reads like a James Bond movie script.
Your above statement was clueless as fuck, and outs you as someone who wasn't a real cypherpunk around back in those days.
Now I believe him even LESS. Are you fucking kidding me?
Hmmmm...Let's see here...
Who is the more credible source?
A Cartel guy, OR the son of a DEA Agent and brother of Police Officer???
I wonder what a Judge and Jury would think. Fuckin idiot.
You guys got anymore articles with FAKE DATES to post as "proof?"
Do you fuckin idiots understand what constitutes PROOF? Proof is irrefutable and documents with fake dates don't mean shit in Court.
>I was 23 years old when I came up with the idea and had ZERO background in Computer Science, or Encryption. You invented cryptocurrency and yet have ZERO background in CS or encryption?? How is this even possible lul Do you even understand what is so groundbreaking about crypto?
>Not to mention, the TEMPORARY ADDRESSES that change after every transaction was entirely MY IDEA, as well... >NON of the programmers came up with that idea. I'm not even sure the "encryption" aspect even guarantees privacy by itself. It's the aspect where Users don't have PERMANENT Addresses that guarantees privacy and that was MY IDEA. The privacy and nonpermanent addresses are not even the main features of bitcoin. Those are even optional. You can reuse addresses all you want.
You don't even understand what made Bitcoin so special.
It's because it solves the Byzantine generals problem, a previously unsolved computer science problem. It prevents double spending.
Where if a user tells one node he sent all his coins to A, then tells another node he sent all his coins to B, how do you determine which claim to believe?
If you can't even explain how this works, you didn't "invent" Bitcoin. Because that is LITERALLY the ONLY thing that makes Bitcoin special.
You're talking about the technical aspects of Hash Cash verification...
What does that have to do with a Limited Number of Coins that increase in value as more money is invested? THAT WAS MY IDEA...
Nobody invest in Cryptocurrency because of Hash Cash Verification, or solving Byzantine Generals Problem....What don't you understand about that?
You guys can post a THOUSAND articles with FAKE DATES all you want...
NON OF IT is proof of anything.
>muh credibility But he NEVER even claimed to be satoshi. The dates just line up, as well as the technical knowledge.
A former programmer into encryption, and when Satoshi said he was leaving Bitcoin because of other matters, was when this guy was cooperating with the 3-letter agencies, and Satoshi disappeared when this guy was put into custody.
It's literally just the BEST MATCH people figured out. He never made any claims.
Dates can be FAKED? Are you not understanding that FACT?
None of the dates I am taking about are fake. Satoshi's disappearance can't be faked. This guy's arrest dates can't be faked. Your argument makes zero sense.
You don't even have the brainpower to understand such simple things, how can you ever hope to "invent" something as complex as Bitcoin?
Polygraphs don't prove anything.
>You're talking about the technical aspects Which is the ONLY THING that makes Bitcoin special.
>What does that have to do with a Limited Number of Coins that increase in value as more money is invested? THAT WAS MY IDEA... Lol you did not invent scarcity or the concept of supply-and-demand. That has been around for as long as gold as money has. Even the stock market works the same way.
>Nobody invest in Cryptocurrency because of Hash Cash Verification, or solving Byzantine Generals Problem....What don't you understand about that? But that is literally the ONLY THING that makes Bitcoin special. It is DECENTRALIZED.
If you don't even understand that, you don't understand what Bitcoin is.
If you can't even explain how that works, I doubt you "invented" Bitcoin. Even I CAN explain it, and I'm a NOBODY.