Is anyone here thinking of the possibility that Swift will confirm link partnership from their side?
Obviously there has been plenty from link's side saying that they are in an active partnership but since the webinar is about the ISO protocol used in new technologies there is a chance that it might be applied with chainlink. A summary of the events to take place on the webinar as as follows, " we will explain how re-using ISO 20022 for APIs can help banks to ensure end-to-end consistency in their business processes by simplifying integration of new technologies and services into existing financial systems and processes".
When it comes down to it, its a war between Corda and Link. If the technology is so similar between the projects and SWIFT has stated that they are working with R3 Corda, then what purpose does chainlink have? In the end will the financial sector choose a more centralized approach rather than the decentralization that is given by chainlink? Even though none of the trails lead to Link when you start with Swift why has the team constantly stated that they are working with SWIFT?
So what do you guys think, will tomorrow be a nothing-burger, or possibly SWIFT stating how they will be working more on implementing R3 Corda, or will we finally get conformation from SWIFT that Chainlink is somehow being implemented?
they will never ever say the word chainlink, ever, they will just call it some obscure name like gpiLINK, thats why on chainlinks website it says its HELPING swift with oracles, nothing else
Jose Baker
Absolutely 0% chance Chainlink is even mentioned. Don't get your hopes up, anons
Samuel Brown
didnt read not selling
Luis Anderson
it was mentioned by a team member in a youtube video that they are in a partnership with swift
Hudson Barnes
Don't get your hopes up
Dominic Foster
Drunkanon here.
Focus on the month leading up to the deadline of the PSD2 integration for banks.
>When it comes down to it, its a war between Corda and Link. Corda is a blockchain and link is oracle solution. Corda uses oraclize which will move to link soon
Adrian Garcia
i pulled down the corda code from github. they have an example oracle as part of their irs-demo code. here is the amazing data source inside this oracle class:
private class InnerState { // TODO Update this to use a database once we have an database API val fixes = HashSet() var container: FixContainer = FixContainer(fixes) }
they basically have nothing, devs have to write their own oracle. that doesn't mean you have to use chainlink, but enterprise devs know, don't build if you can buy.
clearly they are thinking of a number of different scenarios.
It would make sense to me to have the chainlink team write a generic chainlink adapter in the corda ecosystem, that would be very convenient for corda developers to use for all sorts of oracle use cases. on the other hand they could easily roll their own and not use chainlink. as a dev manager though, if there's a fully audited and approved out of the box one size fits all backend for oracles i'm using it, so the opportunity is there.
Brody Hill
T W O Y E A R S W O Y E A R S
Liam Cruz
Swift is using a middleware layer developed by Smart Contract, but not through Chainlink. They use GPI as a blockchain based Oracle that is private. Run a Swift terminal, you're running a GPI node.
is corda for public or private chains? too tired to look it up myself right now, but if corda is on a private chain, they could just run their own centralized chainlink to work as a centralized json parser right? which would kind of be an endorsement of chainlink but wouldn't help the price as they would just be using it in a centralized, free way
Levi Hernandez
why would SmartContract spend millions of dollars in developer hours to develop something that doesn't benefit them at all?
brainlet
Gavin Perry
private chain. i agree within the bounds of one institution private oracles make sense. cross institution data feeds are a pita. and you end up paying anyway. would be incredibly convenient to have a one size fits all adapter that also solves payment at the same time. the near term ability to change who you trust. the future potential for trustless decentralized oracles is a bonus, not a blocker, to my mind (i oversee many integration projects in my work)
Zachary Stewart
What I'm thinking is why would they cash out some of the dev wallet before SWIFT happens. I'm assuming if the breadcrumbs are true, the team would know its happening with considerable probability.
Plausible deniability to possible collusion allegations later on down the line between SWIFT and SmartContract?
We still don’t have confirmation that they sold any link tokens. They could be getting ready to liquidate for an anouncement and moving their tokens before hand.
But this is all hopium
Joseph Miller
Boys i miss the days of assblater... does anyone have some old tales of him
Brayden Young
Assblaster is a tranny.
Blake Smith
Thank you frens. I don't anticipate a chainlink reference but I'm always thinking positive thoughts!
Nicholas Gray
Is there going to be any recording or stream or anything?
Ethan Sullivan
>confirm link partnership with [fill the blank] >partnership Do websites "partner" with the internet?
NO. NO THEY DO NOT
THEY USE IT.
WHY? Because doing commerce via fax machines is ANTIQUATED.
Same concept applies with LINK. Those who wish to be competitive will USE it.
Good luck getting that into the heads of the new generation of moonboi retards.
Parker Morgan
Please make it happen, I have 13hours till my shift starts.
Jose Morris
These chinamen are going to be jumping through their ass holes to scoop up some Link. You're going to wake up and it's going to be $100 a token.
Brayden Perry
I hope you speds ask sped questions
Carson Brown
SOMEONE SCREEN RECORD IT AAAAAAA
Nolan Howard
They won't confirm anything about chainlink, this rumor is started by discordcucks who are trying to hype up something and then when it turns out its not true the price will plummet and they will scoop up more linkies
On the bottom left, click on the headphone button (round), then select the bottom-most option I think, click test to see if it works. If you don't hear anything you may need to mess with the volume control settings on your computer.
Angel Martinez
they are using DLT its over we lost aaaaaaaa
Cooper Rivera
Have they named chainlink explicitly?
Adam Collins
How do I buy DLT? Selling by LINK and going 100% in DLT.
Adam Adams
SCREEN RECORD IT
Brandon Torres
Not yet, they haven't dropped any names as far as I can tell
>Join conference call >Hello who just joined? >Hi, its Karl from Business Transformation & Implementation Strategy >Hi Karl, you're on the line with Deb & Frank from Digital Implementations & Apps, Joe from Digital Transformation, Todd from Midwest Regional Operations, an- >*beep boop* >Hello who just joined? >... >Hello did someone just join? >-ah! Sorry, I had my phone on mute. *WOOF WOOF* WOOF! WOOF!* This is Steve from Implementation Analytics, Enterprise Intelligence & Data Science Infrastructure Solutions >Hi Steve, you're on the line with Karl from Business Transfo-*WOOF WOOF! WOOF!* -mentation Strategy, Deb & Frank from Digital Implementations & Apps, Joe fr- >*beep boop* >Hello? Who just joined?
Zachary Kelly
Does "Pay Later API" mean anything to anyone? >No mention of smart contracts so far (afaik) >Maybe one mention of "blockchain" early on during the introduction (don't remember for sure) Now it's already in Q&A
"the design of the content itself, the payload, can
first of all the busiens smodel explaining the business processes then the business transaction then defining your own thing
database and drt construct.
technologically, different tech can use a different method of ocnnection using their own protocols. even when i say api to dapp api there are saying
based on xml and can be based on json as well. concept of iso20022 is based on business definition itself. standardization is actuallya t that leve.
when you say gpi chainlink to settle payment ledgers, it's sort of off-topic, but is related to something, you guys know we are working ... on a proof of concept utilizing gpi payment linking drt, i think gpi is something separate, but from swift's perspective, gpi can be the way for any payments that come in no matter for trade or security settlements as well. that will be the future."
pretty much paraphrased. i didn't really get it all. typed as fast as i could to whoever asked the cl question.
Wyatt Baker
Yes it is
Asher Perez
The fact that Kenneth knew what Chainlink was and started talking about R3 in response to that question is BULLISH.
Jack Hill
HOLY SHIT MY QUESTION DID GET ANSWERED HE LITERALLY SAID R3 AND CALLED THE THING GPI CHAINLINK NOT GPI LINK!!!!! GPI LINK=GPI CHAINLINK
Luke White
>Off-topic I don't think the speaker really knows or what to make of it at this time
Joshua Howard
LINK TO PROOF?
Jace Hernandez
fuck the moonbois
Ethan Wilson
perfect
Jackson Phillips
I CANT RECORD THIS NIGGA WHY DOES THE SOUND GO THROUGH MY PHONE WTF????? THE CONFERENCE CALLED ME ON MY PHONE AND I HAVE TO WATCH ON THE PC WHAT BOOMER WIZARDRY IS THIS???
Justin Ward
given that it's fairly off topic to talk about transport implementation on a payload standards overview call, i agree bullish
Bentley Lopez
Used in industry quite often
Hunter Scott
>CALLED THE THING GPI CHAINLINK NOT GPI LINK
hmmm, I didn't hear him calling it 'gpi chainlink'. Did anyone else hear it?
Chase Moore
>you guys know we are working ... on a proof of concept utilizing gpi payment linking drt, i think gpi is something separate, but from swift's perspective, gpi can be the way for any payments that come in no matter for trade or security settlements as well. that will be the future.
What does he mean by this?
Gabriel Martinez
Answer to the second question someone asked on smart contracts (heavily paraphrased): >that part i think you are asking about api pointing to dlt >api is just another channel talking to dlt either you have to pay as a node of the dlt, or have to find a way to interface with the node >api may be the easiest way of doing so >content itself is the business standard Don't know what to make of it
Asher Perez
>the decentralization that is given by chainlink?
StainStink is not decentralized.
Grayson Morris
Well, if anybody can get that on video we can make this sheet pamp like a mofo!
Zachary Nguyen
>hmmm, I didn't hear him calling it 'gpi chainlink'. Did anyone else hear it?
A discord tranny said he recorded it but is to autistic to post audio be patient.
Jack Morgan
He definitely said it
Gabriel Evans
standards definition and implementation details are two completely separate conversations. this iso standard is specifying the semantics of communication; the verbs and metadata payloads. it's like if you attended a city transportation strategy session and tried to get them to talk about which vendor was going to supply the bus tires
Jace Watson
Yes, he said
Nolan Robinson
lmao me insider now I hope they make this public, I can't record shit with that setup...
but he definitely started talking about r3 when he was responding to the link question, which means that the oracle in that meme graph getting passed around REALLY IS CHAINLINK
