Youve sworn these documents are authentic?

>Youve sworn these documents are authentic?
>CSW: Are what? Sorry.
>Authentic?
>CSW: They're what were in my possession.
>Dr. Wright, you said they were authentic. Are they authentic?
>CSW: Uh, they are authentically documents in my possession.
>So are they real documents, Dr Wright?
>CSW: They're real documents, but a document means many things.[snip]

>All right. Dr Wright, are these documents forgeries?
>CSW: Um, I don't know.
>Dr Wright, you're testifying directly before this Court. You submitted these documents, you swore to their authenticity, and now you're saying you don't know if they're authentic, if they're not forgeries?
>CSW: Um, all I can say is they are documents that were -- that look similar to ones that I've seen in the past that I haven't had access to that are in company files that have been in my basement for years.

He is literally, unironically, unequivocally, a complete and utter fraud.

Attached: 1513912941218.png (567x567, 152K)

Other urls found in this thread:

bitpaste.app/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Holy shit is that an actual transcript?

I feel bad for BSV, it literally is satoshis vision but this guy being involved ruins the whole thing

Yes, it is.

Ver has a brown belt in BJJ and would break Craig’s arm.

>He is literally, unironically, unequivocally, a complete and utter fraud.
prove it in court then

dude craig what the fuck is your problem

just run normal fucking pnd scams like any other scumbag you goddamned lunatic, what the fuck is wrong with you

what a fucking nincompoop

It's not tho, it's cregcoin which is about as far from Satoshi's vision as possible. Satoshi's vision includes the fact that he stayed truly anonymous and disappeared. Decentralisation is about more than just who's mining.

i honestly feel bad for you sv bagholders....watching tards get wiped out by a conman sucks ...

i hope Craig gets his autism in line

You say this like it isn't happening already.

Please be real

That's what that transcript is proving you fucking dunce

Still more than 2x from its low back in march
Seethe more

CSW go to prison for sure.

Attached: csv.png (910x812, 84K)

Imagine how annoying it must be to be in court and watch this guy evade every question like this.

It's real, user.

Forgot my image

Attached: Screenshot_2019-07-15-14-09-09~2.png (1080x1559, 222K)

Just check this out. Fucking frustrating.

>Dr. Wright, did you edit the from field of this PDF in 2014?
What I'd like to say is --
>I'd like you to answer the question, Dr. Wright.
What you're trying to do is lead me into something that is clearly false.
>COURT: Dr. Wright --
You are creating --
>COURT: Dr. Wright, excuse me. The question was simple: Did you change the from field or not. That's a yes or no question.
This is not the document.
>COURT: I think his question was: Did you change the from field on exhibit 2; yes or no. It's a simple question.
This is not the e-mail, so, no.
>Did you ever edit the from field of the PDF?
This is a PDF of an e-mail, not the e-mail. No.
>Did you ever have someone else edit the from field of the PDF?
This is a PDF of the e-mail that someone has put in falsely as the e-mail and is trying to mislead the Court. This is proveably misleading by you.
>Dr. Wright, let me make it clear. Did you ever edit the from field of exhibit 2?
You are proveably misleading the Court.
>Dr. Wright, answer the question. Did you edit the from field of exhibit 2?
There is no -- this is a printout of a e-mail made at a later time than the e-mail that you are falsely leading the Court to believe is real evidence that you are misleading them on.
>Yes or no, Dr. Wright. Did you edit the from field of exhibit 2?
There is no from field to edit. This is a printed later document that he is now misleading the Court on.
>Will you answer the question?
I have.
>Is the answer "yes"?
You are committing perjury by falsely putting in a document. That is not real evidence. You have created something. [throws paper]
>COURT: Dr. Wright, you throw another document in my courtroom --
I'm sorry, Your Honor.
>COURT: -- you will be in handcuffs so fast your head will spin. Do you understand me?
Yes, Your Honor. I apologize.

This can't be real. Holy shit, BSV is FUCKED!

If you can upload this document to the BSV blockchain I'll send you $12 on hand cash.

Its real, it's a long read and Craig is a dweeb
How to upload? Id do it even just for the lulz

I feel nothing for sanjay vision bag holders it was so fucking obviously a con. And everyone told them that.

>this is a printout of a e-mail made at a later time than the e-mail that you are falsely leading the Court to believe is real evidence that you are misleading them on.
If that's the case couldn't he just say no, I did not edit that document and leave it at that? For a "genius" he really doesn't seem to understand how guilty he's making himself look.

he avoided the question. he doesnt care how guilty it makes him look, what he cares about is committing perjury.

No, he is doing it exactly right.

He did change the from field but a legit reason, let's call it reason X.
The forged pdf has also the from field changed but other info is also false.

If he would admit that he changed the from field on that forged document, court would believe he changed all the info on that document.
So while he changed the from field for reason X on the real document, admitting he changed it on the forged document would bring him in trouble.

I dont even understand what I just wrote but as an Asperger I understand Craig without understanding him.

He's avoiding direct incriminating statements. He could simply plead the 5th and not answer anything at all, but on all accounts hes making himself look guilty as charged.

>user tells me to prove it in court
>we uhh asckkkshuallly literally proving it right now but uhhh it gone take awhile
prove it in court user. dont tell me how you are in the process or you are going to do it someday. why not do it now, why not do it today?

This. It's very clear that converting an email into a PDF document does not change the fact that the underlying email exists and doesn't change whether or not he edited it. He's dodging by saying "well, THIS document is not that email. how could I have edited this? No, I did not edit this pdf."
fucking con

kek thats what hes doing right now

whos dumber? true believers in blockstream or bsv pajeets? it's hard to say