XSN - Seamless Blockchain Interoperability

Beaxy with their next update

XSN did everything that Coinall asked them to do to be listed on OKEx. I can't even trade there because they block Americans too. Ideally, it should work out for them in the long run.
It looks ok to me, but I'm a function over form kinda guy. The wallet could have the UI of a Windows 95-era webpage for all I care if it's fast and all the individual components are robust and responsive.
The worst to me is poorly optimized software with a cutesy and simplistic UI.
Aesthetically-speaking, I'd say certain assets give it a bit of a pseudo-3D look that gives it some middle ground between being too loud and too minimalist.

I think it looks quite appealing

Agree with you on the function part. After looking at it for the 23184th time, i think is not the neonish colors that bothers me, but for some reason the round edges does't look appealing.

BUT I'm just a retarded who don't know shit about UX or design anyway. lol

The ideal is a blend of both. There are those few rare occasions where real talent is working on something and you get a piece of software that's beautifully optimized. Optimization has died out as a practice somewhat as the hardware is so generous that a lot of developers can get away with building overtly resource-heavy programs and no one bats an eye.
I've always admired the old computer demoscene's structure for making software - programmer, musician, graphic artist.
youtube.com/watch?v=DzQVECn3tY8
The people who can make stuff like this with 64k RAM + 20k ROM have my utmost respect.

t. homos

Will you faggots just go watch HGTV and let the real crypto autists talk?

Can someone comment on the cold staking using Ledger Nano? How did you like it and does it add much of a benefit, if so what?

Cold staking isn't ready yet, unfortunately. The X9 devs are waiting on Ledger to implement the code they sent to them in an update.
Trustless staking from a desktop wallet, however, has been up and running since May 2018. I used to use it before I bought some MNs and it was pretty nice. Once I got it set up, I'd leave my wallet closed for weeks/months and come back to a decent amount of staking rewards.

Interesting, so is it possible to run multiple masternodes on one computer?

So I’m a homo for saying I like the design of a mobile wallet? Maybe I should invest in this coin... yeah I think I am retard, thanks!

Yeah. It's pretty easy too.
I just opened up my wallet for the first time this month to take a screenshot of the masternode hosting tab in the wallet. Looks like they've been running for almost 2 months non-stop without an issue.
I run 4 MNs via MNaaS (MNs as a service) from one wallet (pic related) and I've seen others running more than 10. It's rather painless.

Attached: mns.png (878x552, 34K)

Each MN needs a unique IPv4 so if you have that then yes you can

Sorry do you mean just use one computer for your local wallet to store your collateral for your MNs if so then yes. But as far as the MN itself which would be on a different computer/VPS then yes you need a different IPv4 for each actual MN.

>$50k volume
yeah I think I'll stay away

The low volume is due to the exchanges it's being traded on. Coins on Bittrex and Binance are wash traded like crazy, which reflects a ton of FAKE volume.
XSN used to make between $150k-200k volume per day, before the huge shakedown on alts. Most people in XSN, simply isn't selling, so there is no reason to trade your coins really.
With 70% of the total supply locked in cold staking contracts and masternodes, there is a very limited supply left on the exchanges..

It's true. Stakenet isn't on a big exchange yet and it's still relatively unknown. The markets can be brutal and incredibly volatile and I wouldn't recommend investing in XSN unless you're doing so confidently.
Here's a link to the whitepaper if you might be curious as to why it's DEX has so much promise
stakenet.io/Stakenet_Whitepaper.pdf
I like to share the excerpt in pic related to show how the cross-chain interoperability will work for ETH/ERC 20 and EOS. This technique they're employing can theoretically be used for any other dApp platform out there like NEO, Waves, etc.

Attached: xsn wp.png (602x590, 93K)

Just teasing lol

High volume and low supply = Moontastic

Low volume and low supply = Easily manipulate

Ahhhhh sheeeeeeeeit. Sophie's choice

Volume is the least of my worries unironically, I've seen HUGE volume spikes on this project before, and that's generally caused by a huge announcement and people actually realising that the project itself does not only benefit Stakenet investors, but EVERYONE in crypto right now.
That's exactly the thing that "sold" me on this project.
You see SO many altcoins trying to be the "best of the best", while you've got Stakenet that tries to make crypto more user friendly, more secure, and best of all - Staying anonymous which is quite important in times like these with so much regulation BS forced down on everyone.

I miss the good old days back in 2014 where you could trade whatever you wanted, whenever you wanted without anyone needing to know all your personal details. Good old times man

Holy fucking shill, literally the exact same questions and responses in the last 4 threads. Nearly word per word.

I don't intend to sound like a robot if it's my posts that seem repetitive. I've spent a lot of time debating this project with others and the arguments I've made over time have gradually taken a more solid form because people haven't been able to prove them wrong.

Attached: robot.png (121x154, 31K)

time to net some stakes if you know what i mean
( ≖ ͜ʖ≖)

The PS1 version was much better
Not having a 2nd analog stick in a game designed to showcase the power of the DUALSHOCK® was a silly move

Attached: 155696-Ape_Escape_-_On_the_Loose_(USA)-1.jpg (800x1384, 405K)

It's alright, don't mind you shilling, as long as you keep it informational, and not like: "please buy my bags sir" kind of way.

Didn't pay much attention to these threads the last couple of days desu, but from the looks of it, perhaps I should do some digging around

shit shill kys

litecoin-foundation.org/lightning-network-collaboration-with-x-9-developers/

XSN was the 3rd project to implement lightning transactions on mainnet, despite helping LTC get up to speed with it. The 2 teams made a collaboration with each other. See the link above.

Stakenet invented Cold Staking, (Trustless Proof Of Stake)

First POS/MN coin in the world to implement Segwit, Atomic Swaps, And Lightning.

>WHY should you pay attention to this?

XSN's masternodes will act as the backbone of their entire ecosystem.
They just made their Multi Currency Lightning Wallet available for public beta testing on Linux, and at the end of this week they should be ready with the first test build for android as well.
Even if you DON'T invest, or care about Stakenet, you will still be able to use the wallet to do lightning swaps with the integrated 1-click lightning swaps feature.
As an added bonus there is a TOR-integration as well making all your transactions anonymous.
With all the regulations being forced down on exchanges, this will without a doubt be ground breaking whether you like it or not. USDT will move to lightning soon, this means, you'll be able to tether up anonymously in SECONDS with 100% privacy and without risking your coins on a centralized exchange.

ALL the transaction fees from the wallet is distributed to the masternodes holding the chains (which means you don't need to sync with the wallet at all).

>Stakenet Lightning DEX
This one is a real game changer - it's a lightning DEX, which means near INSTANT trades, NO need to sync with the network - masternodes holds the blockchains.

>NO KYC
>NO Registration

Since it's running on masternodes, once the DEX is LIVE, the devs WONT be able to take the DEX down, even if they wanted to, THAT'S how decentralized it really is. All trading fees is distributed to masternodes

Decentralized exchanges is the future, it's how Bitcoin was meant to be used in the first place. Peer to Peer!

Attached: image0.jpg (1122x721, 132K)

You'll be able to hold multiple coins like any other multi currency wallet available for mobile phones, but the exciting part is lightning transactions and TOR integration.
Lightning transactions which is literally a push of a button feature (masternodes takes care of the backend).
Lightning transactions is MUCH cheaper and brings the price of BTC payments down to a few satoshis. The cool part is when they integrate USDT (Tether) later this year, which is moving to lightning soon.

Imagine yourself sitting in the bus on your way to work, you notice a HUGE BTC spike, and KNOW it will correct soon.
Now you simply open your wallet, convert your BTC to USDT, and back once the price corrects, all for a fraction of the cost of what it normally is. 100% secure with near instant transactions.

This will benefit a LOT of people, and ALL the fees collected whether using lightning, normal transactions, TOR transactions etc. Is distributed to the masternodes running it all.

Attached: 62541398_142382770206578_7057306027120524776_n.jpg (480x480, 40K)

I don't want a single person to buy XSN if they are uninformed. If you're looking for a PnD coin, look elsewhere.
I'm here to shill the whitepaper and have lengthy discussions about the overall infrastructure of the crypto space and its inseparable link to cypherpunk ideology. Bitcoin is supposed to be liberating technology and it can only stay that way if it's avenues of exchange resist compromising - i.e. KYC or holding coins in trust. Like the internet, blockchain was made to liberate but it could become an absolute nightmare of censorship and traceability if everyone and everything is immediately identifiable.
If it were the late 1780s, I think I'd be shilling the Constitution and the Bill of Rights as my colonial forebears did.

>when the FUCK is this thing going to get a popular exchange listing?
you're surprised that a coin which is openly stating its intention to directly compete with the big exchanges is not being listed by those very same exchanges?

This is the Cypherpunk Manifesto by Eric Hughes.
It predicted every bad thing that's happened to the internet this decade in 1993 - Google, Facebook, Article 13, subversive data collection and telemetry in nearly everything that weaponizes the id and raw desire of their end-users and pits it against them. It was far ahead of it's time and yet it grows more and more relevant into the future.
This is the building block that Satoshi Nakamoto used to build Bitcoin. If you're in crypto and you haven't read this yet, you should.

Attached: The Cypherpunk Manifesto.jpg (716x1875, 651K)

I am a poorfag and am like $500 away from a master node, any other poorfag want to split one?

This is a shot in the dark here, but do you have access to Linux?
X9 is paying out some decent rewards to bug testers. You might be able to earn a decent amount towards your masternode if you're good at fucking with software and breaking it.

Binance totally screwed Blocknet DX.
>"...Blocknet did apply to be listed on Binance’s Exchange on August 2018, submitting the standard online application. The project followed the usual procedure, which includes answering a series of simple form of questions about the team, nature of the project, target industry, etc."
>"These are standard non-intrusive questions that Binance asks all projects applying to be listed. However, when it came to Blocknet, apparently these standard questions were not enough to evaluate their application; Binance’s head of business development, Ashley Ouyang, had then sent an email to Blocknet with an additional application form that included more questions."
>"Blocknet filled out the form and responded to Ashley the very next day. Then over a month went by with no response from Binance."
>"The radio silence from Binance seemed suspicious to Blocknet, and they began reviewing the questions they had answered in the second application. Only then they realized how much more intrusive the questions were, which made them even more suspicious. Some of the many questions in the second application include information on:"
>Blocknet’s interoperability infrastructure and whether they could find the code in their GitHub.
>Why Blocknet chose to build their DEX
>How Blocknet solves the domain name system problem in the blockchain
>If Binance could receive access to BlockNet’s private repository to view their latest developments
Shady as fuck.
cryptopotato.com/binance-and-neo-accused-by-blocknet-for-stealing-info-used-to-build-binance-dex/

Attached: bn.png (280x180, 5K)

It's okay buddy it sounds like you have about 10k XSN which is a solid suicide stack

Attached: XSN-Logo-2.png (500x500, 83K)

Fuck Binance, I mean they've got a decent exchange, but this move is REALLY fucking disgusting.

It's called private enterprise you commi

Attached: 34fpel.jpg (622x477, 87K)

It is typical behavior for a centralized exchange.
In one sense, it's a shame because Binance successfully managed to be the exception to the rule among them all.
In another, it goes to show what happens when exploitable trust remains the final arbiter of business.
Good people may build something great and even manage to keep it that way for years, but eventually someone else takes over. When good people leave something great, they often take the soul of it with them. Pic related.
It could be argued that nearly every centralized institution founded on good intentions will veer towards corruption and backwardness given enough time.

Attached: hong kong.jpg (768x498, 297K)

Actually, that's perfect. I've been considering moving my funds around so I can get one ASAP. I only have about 4.7k at the moment, though.

Vet each other well, lads. Only one of you can hold the funds. Even if you have duplicate wallets, one of you could screw the other by changing the keys.
I wonder if there's some way to hold both of your XSN in escrow, host a MN, and have it split the rewards. 1/3 to the user with 5k. 2/3 to the user with 10k. It seems feasible.

Doesn't XSN actually have something where you can do a trustless staking pool?

I think I remember that being one of the initiatives in early 2018, but I could've had it wrong

there's a stake in my net

Attached: woody hookah.jpg (480x360, 14K)

>if so it looks like this coin literally does everything wtf is it doing so undervalued

Honestly, man, if we're able to, I'm so down for it. I'll leave this up. I'm feeling a sizable headache coming on so I'm drinking a little bit. Due to the circumstances, I'm not sure I'd be all that helpful in doing the research much more tonight, but I'll keep this up and try to keep checking it every so often for the next few hours.
if you figure things out, drop the info here. I'll try to stick around as long as possible.

I don't believe anything like that exists at the moment.
stakenet.io/TPoS_Factsheet.pdf
The TPoS protocol was built in a way that merchants can expand upon it and offer specialized services as they see fit.
Perhaps the two anons looking to split a MN could make a collective deal with a TPoS merchant willing to host a solo MN and payout a 33/67% split of the MN rewards on some time frame in exchange for 99% (max) staking commissions. It could work.

Attached: tpos.png (788x732, 133K)

Both of you are better off staking for the time being, either by yourself, or by using Stakenets pooled staking service. Cloud.stakenet.io

Yeah they do, they've had it running from the start, and as far as i know, there is more than 1 million XSN being pool staked.

So this is your suggestion, essentially:
stake my shit with everyone else until I have enough for a MN, building my way up with the constant reward from the pool?

Headaches, man. I've had chronic migraines for 15 years. Shit sucks. I hope you feel better.

For the time being, I don't see why they can't just stake, the rewards (right now) is almost identical. It's gonna change a lot once more passive income streams is being implemented to make masternodes even more profits besides the block rewards.
Pooled masternodes will come later perhaps, There are services out there offering this already if you really want to though

Pretty much yeah. Stake it, save up the remaining FIAT you need to buy the remaining coins, and then set it up. That's by far the most logical thing to do in your situation.

save up? don't put them in every paycheck or son?

I agree. It's the most simplistic way to earn rewards. The difference in profitability between staking and the overtly complex MN pooling idea couldn't be all too much.

yeah boys i dunno about not having the private keys to my coins
shill me

You can solo stake if you really want to, with 10k coins you will hit a reward every other day

> Most people in XSN, simply isn't selling
low volume is also when no one buys so your statment isn't a good thing

You could stake from your wallet the traditional way if you don't mind the extra hassle of it.
Otherwise, there is a one-click TPoS solution coming and cold staking will be ready whenever Ledger and Trezor finally get around to implementing X9's code.

so then what's the difference between the cloud stake and the solo stake? how of ten does the cloud stake reward iterate?

>nightmare of censorship and traceability
why stakenet should be better than Monero at privacy?

Stop mucking up this board, paid Discord pajeets.

Buy UND.

this is definitely the most ironic post i've seen in this thread

Monero offers automatic privacy. No traceability, no block explorer.
Stakenet offers optional privacy for a wide variety of coins that are otherwise easy to trace including BTC/LTC via TOR relay and exit nodes hosted on its decentralized MN network.
The more efforts towards privacy in blockchain, the better.

On the cloud you pay a small fee like 5% of your total stake amount, in return you don't need your computer running 24/7, Which is nice.

Stakenet and Monero is 2 completely different projects.

Stakenet aims to make trading, sending and receiving anonymous. You'll be able to send and receive any coin you want with 100% privacy using the TOR integration.

I love Monero, it has its place for privacy, no doubt about that, but Stakenet offers waaaay more in terms of use cases though

Forgot to add. It will take 24 hours from sending your coins to the cloud before they mature and start staking.

so live updates?

Every few minutes you will get a small share of the block rewards being hit. Obviously the more coins you got on the cloud, the bigger is your share. So yeah, you'll get staked in real time.

The block explorer is currently undergoing an upgrade to include precise info on what's being staked. This will include an accurate staking rewards calculator, which should be very helpful in determining what the best present solution for any one stack - staking vs cloud vs TPoS vs MNs

holy shit you guys made a tool that aligns the amount you have to the best option for staking too?
you may be annoying shills, but at least you excite me sometimes.

your a helpful guy

so what are your price predictions?

Its at .10 right now, about 1000 sats.
10mil marketcap

to reach top 100 if would need 100mil marketcap

so that would mean $1. I'm thinking that's likely before September as news of the DEX and the anonymous lightning swaps becomes aware.

Jeez this thing could reach $10 at a top 20/$1B marketcap. That's 100x from now.

If it actually became the leading DEX we're talking at least 10billion which would mean $100 per XSN. which is a 1000X

Having a Masternode that's worth $1.5MM would create instant retirement income. That's only a $1,500 investment today...hmmmmmmmmmmm might have to think hard about this one. I'll let you know what i decide

Attached: 41720970491.png (600x600, 510K)

the bait to hook transition was a bit much.
this is just over the top.
tone it down, guys.

ooft. could do with some of that.
1.5m for a mnode is too much though. DASH, king of masternodes, is worth $123/piece, a masternode only requiring 1k coins, so $123,000. 1.5mil is mad, too many people will be tempted to sell and we'll end up with too few masternodes, no?

man it feels good to be getting in this early. i have very good feels about this project.

Beaxy will list it soon

to be fair it does have an impressively low coin supply. especially when compared with shittokens like biz's billion pet links. i don't think it'll 1k/coin, or if it does it'll be a decade from now, and anyone telling you they can predict what cryptos will be doing in ten years, is a hyperpajeet poofter crafting a cunning ruse whereby he obtains vast chunks of your various cryptonutrients.

Hey man nothing wrong with a little price speculationo

but what kind of precedent does this set for the future? pretty soon this place is going to turn in to an advertising space where numberfags just hang out and post numbers all day.
you guys study trends with numbers, i study social trends. this one is obvious.

What do you see in the social trends o wise one?

Thanks. Once the word gets out about this project to the point that it's well-known enough in the industry to stand on its own legs, I plan to retire from shilling for good.
I've been on Jow Forums since early 2017 and XSN is the only project I've felt I need to shill unironically.
Once this gets the exposure it needs, I'm going back to shitposting.

Attached: beanspiration.jpg (720x720, 70K)

Atomic swap.io already does the multi-currency wallet
atomicwallet.io/
is a competitor.
CZ of Binance advertizes it

sorry dude guess im too much of a retard and it came across as shilling, but i just like going through the numbers

i do think XSN will be kind of fun to hold if it starts to become a big dill though, there's so many different ways to accrue income with it.

will we have the option to choose if we're operating a DEX, lightning swaps, Tor implementation or any of the like? Or will the masternodes just go to whichever function they're needed at?

I understand, man.
I don't know about other anons, I just hate being advertised to. I come here to talk about this shit, more especially the tech and history of teams i plan to invest in if we're talking cryptos. but i love plenty of other things Jow Forums can offer and has offered before. unfortunately, advertising shouldn't be one of them.

Attached: d547h.jpg (630x630, 41K)

So when they say they will support erc20s are they just gonna lock actual erc20s in a smart contract in ethereum then give us some xsn token that represents it? Cause that sounds shitty...

So do I, especially when there's subterfuge involved.
Back around February, some XSN threads started popping up on Jow Forums and it made me a little anxious. You know the nature of this place where delusional promises and outright bullshit run wild. X9 is a great dev team and it would be a shame if all their competence got tossed out because a bunch of obnoxious shills started lying through their teeth and shoving their coin down everyone's throats.
How's your headache doing btw?

just bought 100k, sirs

No intermediaries. If you buy LINK or USDC on the DEX, you're getting the real token.

Yeah but man at a certain point you need a rabid community base to start creating lift for your project. If no one's talking about it, no ones buying it and you find yourself in a situation where you have a great product but 0 exposure

There is a way to get the word out in a high-end and respectful way that attracts good conversation and doesn't insult the intelligence of the reader. If there isn't, I wouldn't even try to give this project exposure.
Once something gets big enough, sure. It's momentum alone will attract all sorts of manic shills and there's nothing anyone can do to stop it. They just follow the money.

Atomic swap.io already does the multi-currency wallet
atomicwallet.io/
is a competitor.
CZ of Binance advertizes it

Also I am worried about the deutsch shilling group behind this.

Some one posted the sreens of shilling in deutch days ago

Good to hear, will look into it

Cool. Is your main hold an ERC20?
I find it interesting to see the different ways that everyone's stacks come into play with this ecosystem.

I think that if they want to be successful they must support ethereum/erc20 tokens. They need native tokens too, no placeholder tokens. I just don’t understand how they are gonna have ETH to BTC transactions on their dex and they have still yet to explain how it will happen. BTC, LTC, DASH seem like easy integrations because they share similar code. But ethereum is a whole other beast.

HELLO, PLEASE
Why is this project different from this wallet?
It has no coin so I am not shilling
It has binance in the hrml page

atomicwallet.io/