QNT are telling people Banks are already using Overledger

570 banks are not using quant.
Quant got fooled by scammers about a fake bitmax listing (at the time $100k of tokens and ETH)
They are still spending all the dump dollars on fancy offices (with no known address)

They continue to shill seq's bullshit articles that actually explain nothing....

And, price is finally dumping as people see the hype was not real.

Going to zero until is unambiguous proof of a team actually working and doing stuff. No one is using quant and there is no evidence they even have a working product.

Attached: IMG_20190604_093044_404.jpg (1246x1280, 213K)

Its a blatent scam theyre a horrible shower of obnoxious cunts too

Heavy duty quant fud.

>gilbert is a infosec 'expert' that got scammed by pajeets on telegram
>overledger is nothing more than a permissioned remote procedure call
>closed source, have to trust quant
>easily replaceable by an open source equivalent
>token is not needed or vital for overledger to work
>after quant tanked from 4 dollars the team hurried out a shit tier masternode system to placate bagholders and stop them from dumping
>vechain tier scammy marketing
>fails the howey test
>muh meetings with companies
>muh gilberts CV

so many red flags.

QNT was one magnificent pump, something I haven't seen since 2017.

1) security experts got scammed by Bitmax impersonators, huge red flag
2) licenses could be super cheap like $1000 per bank, not millions of $ like investors think
3) most banks will be doing their own blockchain solutions anyway, Overledger not needed at all

a x 21 from the ABSOLUTE BOTTOM. Which hardly anyone bought. Most of the plebs bought at 2$ for a x7.

Not bad bot nothing spectacular.

2019, hasnt been bad; bitmax token, aergo, btt, matic, fantom... the list goes on

You are a retard

The issue is Quant the company us a legit company but they used investors to gain funds to develop their private company and gave dapp tickets out in return. Telegram trannies dont have the intelligence to know they are the dumb ones in the room.

Yes. Forgot about licenses potentially costing $100. Team will keep is vague, and continue to hype with buzzwords, until they have sold their team tokens.

And for me, key thing is all partnerships are paid ones, remember hyperledger denying that Quant was going to be chair of fabric. Strangely silent on that. And remember them having to revoke their inatba article. No working product ever demonstrated.

The bag holders forget quickly it seems

lots of truth here desu

Muh fud

complete, utter, unabashed, SCAM


THEY SENT $100K TO FUCKING SCAMMERS ON TELEGRAM. WHAT IN THE FUCK

Lmao. It was at that moment I got out. Rather trust teams like CHR instead.

it is sad that they also believe in their success. Shilbert really has to be careful when he has used all those people to buy hype material.

you must ultimately show something. and that becomes his problem. he can tell but show nothing. otherwise he would have done it as a hyper-long time ago.

so nice if you can ride the hype wave, but get out on time. This is going to be a mess soon.

That’s really the reason why they are refusing to list licenses costs because if investors knew how cheap they were being sold for, people would dump every last qnt they had

Exactly. I just saw that seq retard talking about shilbert CV and that he was in control of 6 billion flowing through the boe.

Basically, you will pay like 10 cents to move $1 million dollars. It does not mean $1 million is turned into quant....

The latest video from Blockchain Brad, and Gilberts latest ‘hyped text’ told me it is a blatant scam. No substance but shilling his own product like a XRP army fan. I’m glad more people are noticing it now. QNT is an example of everything wrong with crypto. Look for companies with a product, not companies saying “we are talking with Central Banks” and all that Bullshit.

Quant is a scam.

You’re forgetting there’s no liquidity so even if you bought the bottom and made it on paper you’d never get out with even half your stack at the top or close to it.

you seem pretty desperate :DDDD

>That’s really the reason why they are refusing to list licenses costs because if investors knew how cheap they were being sold for, people would dump every last qnt they had

evidently, he can't even manage to give his solution (looking for a problem) away for peanuts, or he'd have a lot more to show for his glorified 'meetings'.

Quamfy

>Quamfy

Deluded.

The fud is improving now people have had time to think. Dump it so I can load up on cheapies, Ty.

Three lines of code...

Why the fuck would anyone pay so much for three lines of code.... Three lines of closed source code lol

Is this some organised fud or what ? Only twice I saw so much negativity and that was with Ethereum and Link. Should I invest into this based on how much are people fudding ?

I made my research and I see Gartner Cool Vendor, Guy Dietrich on board, SIA partnership and incoming p2p financial system workshop organised by EU central bank - where Quant is the only crypto project speaking on same stage with Lithuania and Italian central bank.

Oh wait now this fud makes sense. Thank you dumb whales

you can’t even begin to refute any points made in this thread and resort to buzzwords. you deserve to lose your money.

Some dev told me about this three lines of code;”It’s like saying you give someone the keys to go from NY to LA, and these three lines of code make it possible. They forget to mention that the three lines are the key to the car they still have to drive from NY to LA themselves.” They just don’t have any significance. And the whole SIA thing... SIA said they were looking into it with 570 nodes, and Gilbert changed that into ‘we’re talking with 570 banks. That is just wrong.

You didn't make any points. Yes the bitmax thing was a fuck up. Doesn't mean the project isn't legit.

$100 EOY min

Just obvious fud from someone who want to accumulate lower. Happens every time.

Each node is a SIA partner, it's quite literally 570 banks. Read about how siachain works.
This, the bitmax scam was legit retarded but nobody here can ever prove any of the fud they spew and always ignore any explanations given

What do you think of Link?

Fuck off seq

>FotM PnD scam turned out to be a scam
Gee, what a suprise.

Please if you are going to fud at least put some effort into it. Anybody can check the volume and see it’s over 10 million. Unless you are a whale with over $1,000,000 worth of Qnt you won’t have trouble cashing out and even then you could easily cash out 25% a day.

>THEY SENT $100K TO FUCKING SCAMMERS ON TELEGRAM

story pls, i missed this. sounds hilarious

>trusting armenians
You had it coming, guys

fudlarious, stay poor fags. quant is disrupting the blockchain industry aswell as the existing infrastructure. kys if you rather buy shitcones like vidt.

yall gonna be suicidal when you see me whipping your bitch on my yacht that has a rolls royce docked just to ride on the full length of the boat.

Don't even know if your fud is true or not, but the world's youngest billionaire (or one of the youngest) made his billions from a few lines of code. Think it was 5 or so.

VIDT >>>>>>>>>> QNT

VIDT's clients and usecase are REAL unlike QTM and it hasn't had its moon yet. QTM already mooned hard off of hype now is dumping down to a fair market price.

Stay poor brainlet.

The only real volume is on idex, bittrex & upbit newfag

>What do you think of Link?

Chainlink has developer mindshare, Quant doesn't.

apparently Gartner has shilled pump and dump tier coins before

Qtm??? Are you fuckin retarded

pis off turd, goverify depreciates vidt lmao.
quant can do the same as vidt except on a tenfold more blockchains instead of your hilarious 5 blockchains. you invested in a start up you cunt. stay poor pajeet. brainlets will never see diamonds in the dirt

Quant makes VIDT obsolete with its goverify function.
Stay poor bitch.

>you invested in a start up you cunt. stay poor pajeet.

lmao says the quant bagholder.