New York Times says we NEED a $33 minimum wage because $15 per hour is not enough for many to survive.
What say you, Jow Forums?
nytimes.com
New York Times says we NEED a $33 minimum wage because $15 per hour is not enough for many to survive.
What say you, Jow Forums?
nytimes.com
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
coinbase.com
twitter.com
Newfags dont remember this
These governments LARP ignorance that each state sets its own minimum wage on top of the national one. If New York wants a $33 minimum wage they can set theirs to $33.
it means an army of low iq retarded unemployed
MY QUEEN.
that would cause hyperinflation. fucking normies. almost 4 times higher than the current minimum wage? i see no problems there
>NYtimes says we NEED $33 min wage
because the NY times wants 5 million people unemployed so they can bitch about it and blame Trump
Imagine thinking this is the solution and won't create even more problems. What will they do in 10 years? Increase it to $100? I can't wait for minimum paying jobs to get absolutely demolished by machines. PLEASE hurry up technology, I want to see the retards in society get abolished.
They will simply raise it again. $100 per hour minimum wage by $2029. Literal boomers are FUCKED.
The Senate, which as I'm sure you know just passed their $15 per hour minimum wage bill this month, has now declared that $15 is not enough and the minimum wage should be $20 per hour. This is not even the New York Times but actual congresswomen suggesting this.