Daily reminder that: small blocks = small cocks
Daily reminder that: small blocks = small cocks
Luke Rogers
Gabriel Allen
Checked and based
William Mitchell
daily reminder that big blockers are retarded
daily reminder that the scaling solution btc takes is one true pow chain in the center and multiple sidechains anchoring to it via merge mining and chains anchoring to them via merge mining and so on will provide a total transaction throughput orders of magnitudes higher than any big block bullshit could hope for while keeping the main network lean and decentralized and also allowing for multiple specialized currencies and platforms to thrive side by side and all enjoy the security they derive from btc (their reserve currency).
daily reminder that more than pow chain especially of the same pow hash is utterly retarded.
Adam Edwards
*more than one pow chain
Alexander Perry
>multiple sidechains anchoring to it via merge mining and chains anchoring to them via merge mining
>keeping the main network lean and decentralized
Dylan Hughes
it's a much better scaling solution than one retarded huge blockchain stored on a centralized cloud stiffling competition and innovation and natural evolution. craigs vision is disgusting deplorable bullshit.
Joshua Myers
Is it not equivalent to huge blocks if the same miner has to verify the correctness of sidechain blocks he's including?
Jackson Foster
that 's the point of the sidechains everyone only has to store and transfer what is interest to him. the miners of the main chain don't give a fuck about sidechains. they only verify the transactional integrity of the main chain. the second tier chains may support some rudimental two way binding and atomic swap capability as that would be their specialty.
Ethan Collins
"The current system where every user is a network node is not the intended configuration for large scale. That would be like every Usenet user runs their own NNTP server. The design supports letting users just be users. The more burden it is to run a node, the fewer nodes there will be. Those few nodes will be big server farms. The rest will be client nodes that only do transactions and don't generate."
- Satoshi Nakamoto 2010
That's how Bitcoin works, if you don't like it STIFF
Jonathan Nguyen
But then sidechains don't have the full security of the main chain which is about as useless as stand alone chains. The selling point of being a btc sidechain is leeching on the PoW security.
>two way binding
Makes BTC block validity dependent on sidechain validity, and without ZK-proofs which will never happen in bitcoin that means verifying the full block. Unironically prove me wrong, it would make me happy.
>atomic swap
Also no better than a stand alone chain with their own token.