Nano - Satancoin from hell

Fuck NANO

nano getting ready for its epic pump stage 2. Starting to see it in the top 5 gainers quite often since its last bottom. chart is now bullish ALL IN WOOHOO

>nano getting ready for its epic pump stage 2. Starting to see it in the top 5 gainers quite often since its last bottom. chart is now bullish ALL IN WOOHOO
Nano is Bitconnect 2.0 Your comment and pic related.

Attached: Bitconnect moved to Nano.jpg (1418x746, 255K)

If anything you make Nano look like a better investment with your incessant sperging.

Attached: Child-Slapping-Idiot-Roger-Stephens.jpg (500x625, 49K)

The saddest cuck on biz everyone

>If anything you make Nano look like a better investment with your incessant sperging.
You have never met a professional investors in your whole life, ryte? Time for you nanoid idiots to buy some more, pic related.

Attached: Typical Nano 500K buy claim.jpg (1412x647, 157K)

> still buying nano instead of pnk in 2019

>The saddest cuck on biz everyone
That would be the typical nanoids presenting insane and outlandish rumours as tactical investment data, pic related.

Attached: Pathological Nano Lies BoA.png (998x708, 68K)

Here is one more from you nano idiots.

Attached: Pathological Nano Lies PayPal.png (1376x422, 121K)

sorry that you take investment advice from frogs on an internet chat image board site on the world wide web. I can't save you from yourself

>The saddest cuck on biz everyone
Getting cucked in orgies and homosexual anal sex is a big part in virtually all occult worship. Clearly being a total cuck is an integrated part in your Nano devil worship. Just go and ask your Nano community manager RockmSockmjesu

Attached: Nano hodler getting assraped.jpg (750x600, 87K)

Only a retarded satanist/nano investor would seriously believe a nano critics saves those comments because he really believed the usual deceitful nano garbage. Here, another sick and crazy nano rumour, pic.

Attached: Nano is Bitconnect 2.0.jpg (612x122, 18K)

>attacks people and not the tech
your desperation is showing again

Attached: 0HxKxRMB01PCD3bK6.jpg (253x199, 11K)

Kek. Nano is pumping.

Please learn the difference between fluctuation and pumping.

Attached: 1535065112297.png (1208x448, 97K)

>attacks people and not the tech
>your desperation is showing again
OK, here you go:
Nano is a crashed coin with a broken system. The very basis for Nano network is that people will run the whole system for free, for all eternity, all the time, with no downtime, or the Nano network will crash. Can any of you nanoids guarantee that? The integrity of your network is solely based upon people that will work for maybe thousands of hours for free and pay tens of millions in costs for nodes, bandwith for free, for all eternity? How insane, delusional and away from real life is that?

Attached: Another Delusional Nano rumour.jpg (1171x92, 20K)

1. For a global currency with micro-payments, 100 000 TPS is the very bare minimum. What's Nano's current TPS? You claimed 7 000 TPS in DEC 2017. Pic.
2. What is the total costs of Nano network with 100 000 TPS, that you believe people will do for free for no reason. How many tens of millions?

Attached: Nano 7 000+infinity tps.webm (600x338, 2.51M)

>17 days ago
still desperate bruh.
dis organick

>The very basis for Nano network is that people will run the whole system for free, for all eternity, all the time, with no downtime, or the Nano network will crash. Can any of you nanoids guarantee that?
I can say that it's in the best interest of someone to run a node at all times, yea

> pay tens of millions in costs for nodes
lol get real

>How insane, delusional and away from real life is that?
only as insane as your qualifiers to your shit argument.

> 100 000 TPS is the very bare minimum
do you have a figure on that?
Nano doesn't have to start and do 0 to 100000 overnight. It will progress much slower as the network gets more robust, and improvements are made to combat ledger bloat.

>You claimed 7 000 TPS in DEC 2017.
I did not

>you believe people will do for free for no reason
but they do have reason to, if they hold some of the coins they have an indirect incentive to make sure the network is stable.

>How many tens of millions?
not even, get out with that bullshit. running a node isnt like competing in Bitcoin for most hashrate.

>I can say that it's in the best interest of someone to run a node at all times, yea
>but they do have reason to, if they hold some of the coins they have an indirect incentive to make sure the network is stable.
Best interest for someone to clean public toilets for free all the time as well. Does that economic model function really well? Nano's economic model is absurd.
> pay tens of millions in costs for nodes
>lol get real
>not even, get out with that bullshit. running a node isnt like competing in Bitcoin for most hashrate.
OK, show me yours and Nano foundation's cost analysis for CPU, IO and bandwith at 100 000 TPS, the bare minimum for a global currency providing microtransactions.
>Nano doesn't have to start and do 0 to 100000 overnight. It will progress much slower as the network gets more robust, and improvements are made to combat ledger bloat.
Competitors are shortly able to provide 100K transactions. Ethereum devs are working on millions of TPS and are most likely only between 12 and 24 months away. Nano will no way in hell have 100K TPS within that time.
>You claimed 7 000 TPS in DEC 2017.
>I did not
I didn't talk about you personally. Pic related.

Attached: 43243244.jpg (642x739, 127K)

>I am gay ID
go back to /tttt/ faggot

>Best interest for someone to clean public toilets for free all the time as well.
non sequitur
>Does that economic model function really well? Nano's economic model is absurd.
it does function well, sorry it seems so absurd to you.
>OK, show me yours and Nano foundation's cost analysis for CPU, IO and bandwith at 100 000 TPS, the bare minimum for a global currency providing microtransactions.
You still don't get it, Nano doesn't need to do that overnight. Also why did you pull 100k TPS out of your ass? take it a step at a time and enjoy the ride. Nano is also more than microtransactions, and NF hasn't even started to look at second layer options if they even feel the need for it.
>Competitors are shortly able to provide 100K transactions.
If they can do it without breaking the system, while still being decentralized that's awesome, ill buy some. until then you should sit back and watch the progress fren

>non sequitur
OK, when has the economic model where the majority use a service provided by a minority for free ever functioned medium or long term? After the price of Nano stabilizes and there is no more potential speculative reason for a holder to run an expensive nano node, why would this model function? Do you have ANY empirical data where a similar model functioned, ever?
>it does function well, sorry it seems so absurd to you.
As an amateur model and kitchen table project among friends and enthusiasts with a network not used at all. Not the same as a global currency handling microtransactions for a couple of billion people, is it?
>Also why did you pull 100k TPS out of your ass?
VISA, not aimed at micro transactions and banking the unbanked, are calibrated to handle 60 000 TPS.
>You still don't get it, Nano doesn't need to do that overnight.
I never said that. I gave you estimates for your competitors. Nano has no chance to compete with them. Add ZuckBucks into the mix and Nano is doomed.
>until then you should sit back and watch the progress fren
For a short time sail ships were better than engine driven ships in every way. Speed, costs etc. That didn't last very long and ought to be obvious for everyone with a minimal of analytical skills. Same with Nano. That the community operates like a (satan worshiping) death cult with open satanists and community leaders named RockmSockmjesus, does not bode well for Nano.

Attached: Nano..jpg (1088x612, 224K)

>OK, when has the economic model where the majority use a service provided by a minority for free ever functioned medium or long term?
i cant think of one offhand, but that doesn't in itself mean it cannot work.
>with a network not used at all.
it is being used. more and more each week. bitcoin in 2013 was barely used also, and it his its ceiling. Nano has a much higher ceiling and still has some scalability improvements on the way.
>a global currency handling microtransactions for a couple of billion people, is it?
For investors who get in now, Nano doesn't have to become the only globally used cryptocurrency. If it gets a small amount of users, globally speaking, then Nanoids will bank.
>VISA, not aimed at micro transactions and banking the unbanked, are calibrated to handle 60 000 TPS
sure, but thats almost half of 100,000 TPS, and Visa's 60k TPS is really only a peak, non-sustainable figure. but i see your point, hardware does need to scale, but also see my above point.
>Add ZuckBucks into the mix
Those are centralized to shit, we both know this. we can limit our discussion to truly decentralized and immutable currencies.
>RockmSockmjesus
where did he touch you?

op is retarded
still not buying any nano

I am satanist and I buy nano. Will help build my latest sacrifice platform at the top of the next bullrun

>but that doesn't in itself mean it cannot work.
No, it does mean it cannot work. What would you say if I came to you with a business model where volunteers should clean our houses every single day for free? Would you invest any money in that business model?
>it is being used. more and more each week
Compared to the load on the network if a global currency with micropayments, this is absolutely nothing. To use current traffic as a benchmark is utterly ludicrous.
>only a peak, non-sustainable figure
VISA can sustain 60 000 TPS as long as they want. Nano would crash. Only a few months ago there was a small spam attack and Nano crashed. Less than 1000 TPS. It's a total joke, talking about Nano as a the future of interne payment.
>Those are centralized to shit,
Normies don't care. Ethereum will have an ecosystem, smart contracts etc that Zuckbucks will not. You are competing directly with Zuckbucks and will crash, even if your failed tech, failed business model with volunteers taking the all the network costs for nothing etc, worked, Zuckbucks will smash Nano. There is no future for Nano, at all
>RockmSockmjesus
For Nano foundation to use a guy like that as a community manager only further conveys, on top of Bitgrail, that they are either incompetent, evil or both.

Attached: Nano is Bitconnect 2.0.png (760x400, 329K)

>I am satanist and I buy nano
Nano is pretty much the ultimate crypto for Satanists, right? Why is that? Is it due to the satanic behaviour of the devs and team, plus hellish tech? See:

Dangerous flaws and major problems with Nano
archive.is/diUnZ

Nano Heading for Disaster – Dirty Deals with BitGrail
archive.is/GGWIG

Nano and Bitgrail leaders scammed over $100 million from Bitgrail
archive.is/zAtyl

Attached: Coming Nano Disaster Part II.jpg (1024x606, 119K)

poor nanofudder. you are so pathetic.
you have been posting the same pasta here for over a year now while nano makes great advancements. lol at you

go back to therapy

Lmao what is this thread. Just lmao.

Nano fudder - you should have bought by now you had plenty of time. You still have time before its $100

if you have a financial stake in the success of those public toilets then sure youd want to keep them clean.

boy did i fuck up selling early...

>nano makes great advancements
What "great advancements" would that be, Nanoid? Have you finally reached the 7000 TPS you and your devs lied about DEC 2017 and was the only reason why Nano mooned? No? You are still on a couple of hundred TPS while your competitors are working on 100K up to millions and will roll it out in a matter of months. You nano idiots are delusional. Small fluctuation from your total crash and you all start to ramble on about 1000 EOY? Pyscho morons, pic related.

Attached: Nasty Nano Community II.jpg (1417x674, 245K)

When the market is saturated and there is no more potential upside in holding Nanos there is no incentive to run those nodes for free. The very fact that neither you, nor the Nano foundation, has done any cost analysis for a 100 000 TPS global network (CPU, IO and bandwith) only further displays how moronic both the nano team and nano investors are. Sorry.

Attached: Nano Heading for Disaster.jpg (1105x576, 122K)

CHECKED

Attached: 1562751761992.jpg (760x392, 44K)

lmao. nano is being used for point of sales systems, amongst others.

reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/c233ve/kappture_using_nano_on_their_pos_system/

So how many million individual users do you have per month for your global currency,using your point of sales systems. What are the numbers?

Attached: Nano Hodlers.jpg (609x884, 184K)

the point is, nanofudder, you lost.
nano is being developed. it's the fastest crypto. it's feeless and companies build on it.

now fuck off

Nano is a kitchen table project by amateurs and fanatics. Colin was working part time, alone, on the project until the Italians scammers started to push XRB on you delusional idiots. Nano crashes constantly, are not being able to even go over a couple of hundred TPS per second, D grade shitcoin according to Weiss, not part of cryptos mentioned by ICE (Bakkt), not on Coinbase, insane cost model that will never work in real life, no cost analysis, no real use. You did not answer my question. Do you even have more than a handful individual users for your "global" currency actually buying stuff? As you have nothing more than being a currency, unlike ETH with smart contracts etc. Nano is a boomer coin, a true plebbit coin that will not function in real life.

Attached: Nano-boomers.jpg (612x788, 95K)

keep going nanofudder. you are only making a fool out of yourself with your shitty spam.

how fucking pathetic do you have to be to spam the same stuff almost daily for one year straight, in any nano thread. holy shit.

This is my last reply. also, saged.

Attached: christian.jpg (432x600, 186K)

Attached: 1514860165463.jpg (1001x823, 164K)

>same stuff almost daily for one year straight
You are delusional. It can sometimes go months without me posting anything on biz, far less about Nano. You nanoid idiots can't provide even basic data and factual answers to my questions, so you always must retort to mudslinging, hysteria and ad hominem. Pathetic.

So you present yourself as a Christian, my fake friend? What do you think about Nano foundation supporting community managers like RockmSockmjesus. You are totally cool with that, right? You don't see that as neither amateurish, incompetent or even evil, right my fake Christian friend? Do you also hysterically support open borders and multiculturalism just like Zack Shapiro, tweeting about it every single day, seemingly with full support from the Nano team and Mica Busch with his crazy attacks on free speech and GAB? Are you also in full support of globohomo, my "Christian" friend?

Attached: The Nano Van looking for New Investors.jpg (640x400, 58K)

>OK, when has the economic model where the majority use a service provided by a minority for free ever functioned medium or long term? After the price of Nano stabilizes and there is no more potential speculative reason for a holder to run an expensive nano node, why would this model function? Do you have ANY empirical data where a similar model functioned, ever?
Wikipedia

oh hey, thanks. What a wonderful example

So it does work in other systems, and I can't wait to see Nano hit $100.

Nanofudder get stuffed

Attached: NANO, SON.png (1360x768, 963K)

>Wikipedia
That's a hobby, like being part of a political party pushing your knowledge and views. Can't be compared with the heavy costs involved with running nodes for 100 000 TPS for all eternity with no downtime, all done by volunteers for free. Go to any park or public place if the workers there strike. It looks like hell within a few days. According to Nano and you, that would be no problem as all people would clean up everything for free. It does not work that way, your commie-coin does not work.

Attached: KYC Nano BitGrail1.jpg (876x424, 38K)

Every time you make a thread. I always get a laugh out of it thank you.

Pretty sure running wikipedia is more expensive tbqh

muh nano doesn't get 6 gorillion tps yet

Attached: nanorai.png (498x488, 296K)

Also why is it pumping. Im still accumulating. FUD more please.

Even if hater, you are welcome :)

no shit pajeets literally spammed the faucet for this shitcoin all day

>pretty sure running wikipedia is more expensive tbqh
No, running a global payment system, decentralized, is insanely expensive. My guess is tens of millions each year. Can't be compared to Wiki. They push a political agenda and those that support that agenda are willing to pay. Running a node is just pure costs and work for free. The idea is crazy, like setting up a VISA system for free, run and paid for by volunteers. It will not happen.

Attached: Nano 75 TPS Aug 2018.png (670x708, 104K)

>Running a node is just pure costs and work for free
Every bit as political as wiki, in fact more. Number pulled out your ass.

>Every bit as political as wiki, in fact more.
No, why is not paypal run for free by volunteers?
>Number pulled out your ass.
So where is the cost analysis from Nano foundation for 100 000 TPS? Have any of you Nano investors ever done a simple cost analysis? You invest large sums in a project where you don't even know and understand the basics and the foundation keep you completely in the dark? That's gambling, not investing.

Attached: 1542334980396.jpg (1620x599, 145K)

get rekt fag, the future is now and people like you don't deserve to be a part of it

Attached: HEILNANO.jpg (640x426, 48K)

Not a nano investor and no, I don't care enough to do a cost analysis since I have nothing riding on it. Assuming some kind of state sharding in the future, it won't be very costly as it would scale roughly linearly. Considering the simple architecture, sharding should be manageable.

>No, why is not paypal run for free by volunteers?
Because a decentralized collective can't deal with banks like a centralized authority can.

>Because a decentralized collective can't deal with banks like a centralized authority can.
Your false premise was that running a financial system for free was just the same as supporting your political party or sports club. It's not, that's why we have Wiki and political volunteers, but we don't have a VISA or PayPal run by volunteers. The comparison is ludicrous.
>Not a nano investor
Yeah, right. Just very passionate about Nano
>should be manageable
No. Not even close. Nano is far behind other competitors without the crazy business model where Nano must be run for free by volunteers.

that was may 2018
it never went back up to that level

>The comparison is ludicrous.
The ron paul and associated movements would disagree.

>Yeah, right. Just very passionate about Nano
Not really, more fascinated by your persistence and that you think literally anyone cares about satanists. The 90s want their boogeyman back. Nano will fail for reasons that aren't node maintenance cost.

Attached: 12d.jpg (567x561, 57K)

>Nano will fail for reasons that aren't node maintenance cost.
OK, name the other reasons then, and explain.

It has nothing but payments (and plans nothing more), cannot interoperate (doesn't plan to), and will never break the chicken/egg problem that comes with payments because of volatility. Also can't take another niche and then expand into payments by leveraging existing users and infrastructure.

>inb4 POI terminals
tiny company and will be dropped within six months

Because we are Thelemites and Nano has been chosen as the new world reserve currency. Naturally, the common man will rebel against the number of the beast as we incorporate it into IoT, smart devices, television & internet, body implants, and develop systems of points that are given or taken away based on the individual's actions, microtransactions like one couldn't dream of, only every action becomes a trans-action. The world governments who are allied will not agree on a centralized unit of currency that any one nation is in charge of, so it has come to agreement that a decentralized currency with a (current) limit of production is ideal. So this leaves us with BTC and Nano essentially. BTC will lead to global warming however and will eventually have to be phased out due to its poor "beta" version design, so naturally Nano takes the role as the top choice. It has already been selected so to speak. But I digress, it will obviously fail because the common man will not ever let this happen. Will he?

Attached: 461689399279339854.jpg (720x720, 80K)

Attached: 461689399279339730.jpg (427x640, 145K)

All are welcome, but only few will come.

Attached: 461689399279339863.jpg (485x750, 111K)

Why are you occultists always so low IQ and hide behind empty slogans and rambling? There is a reason why you and satan always have to hide in the dark.

Fear becomes you, oh child of ignorance

Attached: 461689399280373724.jpg (387x700, 95K)

summoning 42 to this thread going to need your shamanic insight on this.

Only women and weak men seek power from demons and satan.

what the fucks going on here why is nano mooning. fud harder you pajeet. talk about bomber, or something. IM NOT DONE ACCUMULATING

Why is it mooning. Stop buying you pajeets

Don't worry, this is just temporary. Nano will crash back sub 1 USD again pretty soon.

Fuck. FUD harder faggit. Talk about the developers something. Its still climbing.

It has begun.

Attached: 461689399279339882.jpg (540x698, 112K)

Join me, my children of darkness, so that we may manifest the light

Attached: 344314333994701535.jpg (445x900, 627K)

Post your NANO mooning music. Mine is Lamb of God.

youtube.com/watch?v=HUKsUtHx4QU
>The Midnight

Attached: 344314333995219489.jpg (500x655, 112K)

What is this gay, Stranger Things montage, sound? I hope you aren't really serious, user. Satan still burns fags.

Attached: 1551835839558.jpg (788x737, 137K)

This is also fire if you like synthwave

>youtube.com/watch?v=c9cZSLfh7Xw

Attached: 344314333995095923.jpg (644x650, 88K)

Sorry user the dark one has cursed me with an undying love for 80's retro synthpop. Here, this is more in line with "The Objective of the Dark One", and signifies Nano rising to its peak, the fall to the bottom, and now its new rise up again, granting the light to the people, of whom it belongs.

>youtube.com/watch?v=6A-IoOEPbUs

Attached: 344314333996079940.jpg (430x616, 117K)

I guess that is appropriate, if the bishop allows it.

Attached: 11-seriously-weird-facts-about-jesuss-foreskin-2-5737-1484739448-0_dblbig.jpg (625x415, 98K)

Superdank right here, Lo-fi Vaporwave Trap, not even sure what the fuck you call this shit but it is 10/10
>youtube.com/watch?v=79Suucn6Y0o

>Nano is far behind other competitors without the crazy business model where Nano must be run for free by volunteers
So you admit then that Nano is the furthest along and best technical implementation of a coin with this economic model. Now we should just debate the assumptions within your argument that its flawed. This mainly assumes either you think mon-monetary incentives don't exist, or that node software wont continue to improve the node software to reduce the requirements needed / computer power womt continue to increase.

youtube.com/watch?v=31j4DIpgY9U

Attached: 344314333995215225.jpg (350x327, 166K)

Thank you for posting your gay FUD music. Its working. Keep posting them. You should some of Grimes horrible music. That should surely FUD the price down

fuck you nog grimes is awesome

>youtube.com/watch?v=Ze1ux7GiW_s

You guys gotta look up Glacier. And if you really like synthwave, check out First Blood by Kavinsky.